The United States Postal Service is evaluating a regulatory amendment that would permit the mailing of handguns, potentially overturning a prohibition in place since 1927.

美國郵政署目前正在評估一項監管修訂，旨在允許寄送手槍，這可能會推翻自 1927 年起實施的禁令。

The current restrictive framework originates from a 1927 congressional statute designed to mitigate criminal activity by limiting the shipment of concealable firearms to licensed dealers. However, the Department of Justice has recently asserted that this statute is unconstitutional, contending that the Second Amendment precludes the government from denying the shipment of protected firearms to law-abiding citizens. Consequently, the USPS has proposed a rule that would extend the shipping privileges currently afforded to long-barreled rifles and shotguns to include pistols and revolvers, provided they are unloaded and securely packaged.

目前的限制性框架源於 1927 年的國會法令，旨在透過限制將可隱藏槍械寄送至持牌經銷商，以減少犯罪活動。然而，司法部近期主張該法令違憲，認為根據第二修正案，政府不得拒絕守法公民寄送受保護的槍械。因此，美國郵政署提出了一項規則，只要槍械未裝彈且包裝安全，將目前授予長槍與散彈槍的寄送特權擴展至手槍與左輪手槍。

Stakeholder positioning reveals a significant divergence in legal and ethical interpretations. The Department of Justice maintains that the current heterogeneity of state firearm laws creates prohibitive barriers for citizens transporting weapons for lawful purposes, such as hunting or self-defense, rendering the postal service the only viable transport mechanism. Conversely, a coalition of attorneys general from approximately two dozen states argues that such a policy would facilitate the acquisition of firearms by prohibited persons, including convicted felons. They further contend that the executive branch lacks the authority to supersede congressional legislation and that the rule would circumvent state-mandated safety courses and background checks.

相關利益方的立場顯示，在法律與倫理解釋上存在顯著分歧。司法部堅持認為，目前各州槍械法規的不統一，為公民出於合法目的（如狩獵或自衛）運送武器創造了極高障礙，使得郵政服務成為唯一可行的運輸機制。相反地，由約二十多個州的總檢察長組成的聯盟則認為，此類政策將便利被禁止對象（包括被定罪的重罪犯）獲取槍械。他們進一步主張，行政部門缺乏取代國會立法的權限，且該規則將規避州政府規定的安全課程與背景調查。

Operational implications include the potential necessity for law enforcement to implement new tracking architectures, which the opposing attorneys general suggest would impose fiscal burdens on state budgets. This proposed shift contrasts with the policies of private carriers such as UPS and FedEx, which maintain restrictions limiting firearm shipments to holders of federal firearms licenses. While firearm advocacy groups, including the National Rifle Association, characterize the move as a victory for constitutional rights, gun safety organizations, such as Everytown for Gun Safety, suggest the change could facilitate illegal weapons trafficking.

運作層面的影響包括執法部門可能需要實施新的追蹤機制，反對的總檢察長認為這將給州政府預算帶來財政負擔。這項擬議的轉變與 UPS 和 FedEx 等私人承運商的政策形成對比，後者仍維持僅限於聯邦槍械執照持有者寄送槍械的限制。雖然包括美國國家步槍協會（NRA）在內的槍械倡議團體將此舉視為憲法權利的勝利，但如 Everytown for Gun Safety 等槍械安全組織則認為，此項變更可能會助長非法武器走私。

The USPS is currently reviewing public commentary before determining whether to finalize the rule change.

美國郵政署目前正在審視公眾評論，隨後將決定是否正式敲定該規則變更。