Recent polling data indicates a broad consensus among the American electorate favoring the imposition of maximum age limits and term restrictions on members of Congress.

近期民調數據顯示，美國選民之間存在廣泛共識，傾向對國會議員設定最高年齡限制與任期限制。

Quantitative data derived from an NPR/PBS News/Marist survey of 1,322 respondents reveals a significant cross-partisan demand for legislative reform. Approximately 80% of the population supports the establishment of age caps and term limits. This sentiment is corroborated by specific partisan breakdowns, with 78% of Democrats and 83% to 89% of Republicans endorsing these measures. Notably, the data suggests that this preference is not confined to younger cohorts; Generation X exhibits the highest levels of support, indicating a systemic desire for generational turnover regardless of the voter's own age.

根據 NPR/PBS News/Marist 對 1,322 名受訪者進行的定量調查顯示，跨黨派之間對立法改革有顯著需求。約 80% 的人口支持設立年齡上限與任期限制。具體的黨派分析證實了這一情緒，78% 的民主黨人以及 83% 至 89% 的共和黨人支持這些措施。值得注意的是，數據顯示這種偏好並不局限於年輕族群；X 世代的支持率最高，顯示出無論選民自身年齡如何，對於世代交替都有系統性的渴望。

The impetus for this sentiment is linked to a perceived demographic divergence between the legislative body and the general workforce. While the median age of the U.S. worker is 42, the median age for House and Senate members is 58 and 65, respectively. The current Congress is categorized as the third oldest in national history. This disparity has led to claims of institutional detachment, particularly among voters aged 18 to 29, a plurality of whom believe their interests are not represented by the current leadership. Furthermore, the visibility of advanced age in the executive branch has intensified scrutiny regarding the cognitive and physical fitness of elderly officials.

這種情緒的推動力與立法機關與一般勞動力之間感知到的人口差異有關。美國工人的中位數年齡為 42 歲，而眾議院與參議院議員的中位數年齡分別為 58 歲與 65 歲。現屆國會被列為國家歷史上第三年長的國會。這種差距導致了對體制脫節的指責，特別是在 18 至 29 歲的選民中，其中大多數人認為目前的領導層未能代表他們的利益。此外，行政部門中高齡現象的顯著，也加劇了對高齡官員認知與身體健康狀況的審視。

Despite the prevalence of public support, the transition from sentiment to policy is obstructed by significant legal and procedural impediments. Pursuant to the Supreme Court ruling in U.S. Term Limits, Inc. v. Thornton, the imposition of additional qualifications for congressional service necessitates a constitutional amendment. Such a mechanism requires a two-thirds majority within Congress, a threshold unlikely to be met given that legislators would be required to vote for the curtailment of their own tenure.

儘管公眾支持度高，但從情緒轉化為政策的過程受到顯著法律與程序障礙的阻礙。根據最高法院在「美國任期限制公司 訴 桑頓案」中的裁決，對國會任職增加額外資格限制必須通過憲法修正案。此機制需要國會三分之二多數通過，鑑於立法者需投票縮短自身任期，此門檻極不可能達成。

While there is overwhelming public support for age and term limits in Congress, constitutional requirements render the implementation of such reforms improbable under current legislative conditions.

雖然公眾壓倒性地支持國會設立年齡與任期限制，但憲法要求使得此類改革在目前的立法條件下難以實現。