Ukraine and Germany are managing conflicting findings concerning the responsibility for the 2022 destruction of the Nord Stream gas pipelines.

烏克蘭與德國目前正處理關於 2022 年北溪天然氣管道遭破壞責任之矛盾調查結果。

The geopolitical tension centers on the indictment by German prosecutors of Serhii K., a former Ukrainian military officer. German judicial authorities allege that the defendant coordinated the sabotage of the Nord Stream 1 and 2 pipelines to obstruct Russian energy revenues. This legal proceeding is predicated on the assertion that the operation was executed on behalf of Ukrainian state entities. Notably, the German Federal Court of Justice has determined that the defendant is ineligible for combatant privilege, thereby rendering the alleged wartime actions punishable under their jurisdiction.

地緣政治緊張局勢的核心在於德國檢察官對前烏克蘭軍官 Serhii K. 的起訴。德國司法機關指控被告協調破壞北溪 1 號與 2 號管道，以阻斷俄羅斯的能源收入。此法律程序是基於該行動係代表烏克蘭國家實體執行的主張。值得注意的是，德國聯邦最高法院已判定被告不享有戰鬥員特權，因此涉嫌的戰時行為在其司法管轄權下應受懲處。

Conversely, the Ukrainian Prosecutor General's office maintains that internal investigations have yielded no evidence of state or individual official complicity. While acknowledging that the evidentiary process remains incomplete, Kyiv has formally denied institutional involvement. To facilitate a potential rapprochement of these divergent findings, the Ukrainian prosecutor has proposed the establishment of a joint investigative team with Berlin. This proposal occurs amidst a broader context of ongoing cooperation between the two nations, although Ukraine asserts that its own probe is primarily motivated by investigations into Russian war crimes rather than the German proceedings.

相反地，烏克蘭總檢察長辦公室則堅持內部調查未發現國家或個別官員參與的證據。儘管承認證據程序尚未完成，但基輔已正式否認制度性參與。為了促成這些分歧結果的潛在趨同，烏克蘭檢察官建議與柏林成立聯合調查小組。此建議是在兩國持續合作的更廣泛背景下提出的，儘管烏克蘭主張其自身調查主要是出於對俄羅斯戰爭罪行的調查，而非針對德國的法律程序。

Germany continues the prosecution of a former Ukrainian soldier while Ukraine denies state involvement and proposes a joint investigation.

德國繼續起訴一名前烏克蘭士兵，而烏克蘭否認國家參與並建議進行聯合調查。