The Royal Commission on Antisemitism and Social Cohesion is examining the editorial standards and complaint mechanisms of the ABC and SBS concerning their coverage of the Israel-Gaza conflict.

反猶太主義與社會凝聚力皇家委員會正就 ABC 與 SBS 關於以色列-加沙衝突報導的編輯標準及投訴機制進行審查。

The proceedings have featured testimony from the Special Envoy to Combat Antisemitism, Jillian Segal, who posited that current internal oversight mechanisms are insufficient. Ms. Segal asserted that a pervasive perception exists within the Australian Jewish community that public broadcasting lacks balance, overemphasizes the Gaza conflict relative to other global events, and provides disproportionate visibility to anti-Israel perspectives. She characterized the current internal ombudsman system as a conflict of interest, suggesting that the broadcasters effectively adjudicate their own compliance. Consequently, she advocated for the implementation of an external regulatory body, citing the UK's Ofcom as a model for a regime capable of mandating content removal and imposing financial penalties.

在聆訊中，反猶太主義特別特使 Jillian Segal 發表證詞，認為目前的內部監督機制並不充分。Segal 女士主張，澳洲猶太社區普遍認為公共廣播缺乏平衡，相較於其他全球事件，過度強調加沙衝突，並給予反以色列觀點不成比例的能見度。她將目前的內部申訴專員制度形容為利益衝突，認為廣播公司實際上是在自行判定其合規情況。因此，她主張建立一個外部監管機構，並以英國的 Ofcom 為模範，建立一個能夠強制要求刪除內容並處以罰金的體制。

Institutional responses from the broadcasters diverge from these assertions. The ABC provided data indicating that perceptions of bias are bifurcated, with 51% of complaints alleging a pro-Palestinian bias and 47% alleging a pro-Israel bias, suggesting that such perceptions are derived from divergent community viewpoints rather than systemic editorial failure. Furthermore, the ABC noted that no complaints of bias have been upheld by its ombudsman or the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA). SBS has cautioned against governance modifications that might jeopardize editorial independence or duplicate existing accountability structures.

廣播公司的機構回應則與上述主張相左。ABC 提供的數據顯示，對偏見的看法呈現兩極化，其中 51% 的投訴指稱偏向巴勒斯坦，而 47% 則指稱偏向以色列，這顯示此類看法源於社區截然不同的觀點，而非系統性的編輯失敗。此外，ABC 指出，其申訴專員或澳洲通訊與媒體管理局 (ACMA) 從未支持過任何關於偏見的投訴。

Historical and definitional tensions underpin the inquiry. A primary point of contention involves the adoption of the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) definition of antisemitism; both the ABC and SBS have declined its use, citing concerns that the definition may conflate legitimate criticism of the State of Israel with antisemitism. The commission is further analyzing the correlation between media reportage and the prevalence of antisemitism within Australia, while the broadcasters maintain that their journalism does not contribute to social division.

歷史與定義上的緊張關係是此次調查的基礎。一個主要的爭議點在於是否採納國際大屠殺記憶聯盟 (IHRA) 對反猶太主義的定義；ABC 與 SBS 均拒絕使用，理由是擔心該定義可能會將對以色列國的正當批評與反猶太主義混淆。委員會進一步分析媒體報導與澳洲反猶太主義盛行程度之間的相關性，而廣播公司則堅持其新聞報導並未導致社會分歧。

The Royal Commission continues to evaluate the adequacy of public broadcasting complaint-handling mechanisms and will soon transition its focus to the university sector.

皇家委員會將繼續評估公共廣播投訴處理機制的充分性，並將很快將焦點轉向大學部門。