The European Union and the United States have intervened to address the escalating humanitarian crisis in Sudan, while the Sudanese government maintains stringent conditions for any ceasefire agreement.

歐盟與美國已介入處理蘇丹日益嚴重的人道主義危機，而蘇丹政府則對任何停火協議維持嚴格的條件。

The current security paradigm in North Kordofan is characterized by a significant military buildup by the Rapid Support Forces (RSF) in El-Obeid. This concentration of force threatens a civilian population of approximately 500,000, including 100,000 internally displaced persons. The European Union, via Foreign Policy Chief Kaja Kallas, has articulated grave concern regarding the RSF's deployment of unmanned aerial vehicles against critical infrastructure, such as power and fuel facilities. Consequently, the EU has signaled the potential implementation of robust measures should international humanitarian law continue to be disregarded, while simultaneously urging external actors to cease the provision of support in accordance with the Berlin Principles.

北科爾多法州目前的安全格局以快速支援部隊 (RSF) 在歐拜德的大規模軍事部署為特徵。這種兵力集中威脅到約 50 萬名平民，其中包括 10 萬名國內流離失所者。歐盟外交政策主管卡雅·卡拉斯已對 RSF 部署無人機攻擊電廠與燃料設施等關鍵基礎設施表示深切關注。因此，歐盟暗示若國際人道法持續被無視，可能會採取強而有力的措施，同時敦促外部勢力根據《柏林原則》停止提供支援。

Parallel to these developments, a diplomatic initiative led by the United States has proposed a 90-day humanitarian truce to facilitate aid and initiate a transition toward civilian-led governance. The Sudanese government's response, detailed in a document titled 'Restoring Peace in Sudan,' posits a conditional acceptance of this roadmap. The administration asserts that any truce must occur concurrently with the total withdrawal of the RSF from urban centers. Furthermore, the government demands the complete disarmament and demobilization of the paramilitary force, with the reintegration of eligible personnel into the national military under United Nations supervision.

與此平行，由美國領導的一項外交倡議提出了為期 90 天的人道主義休戰，以利於援助並開啟向平民領導治理的過渡。蘇丹政府在一份名為《恢復蘇丹和平》的文件中詳細回應，表示有條件地接受此路線圖。政府主張，任何休戰必須與 RSF 全面撤出城市中心同步進行。此外，政府要求該準軍事力量必須完全解除武裝並解散，並在聯合國監督下將合格人員重新編入國家軍隊。

Institutional positioning remains rigid, as evidenced by the rhetoric of Transitional Sovereignty Council Chairman Abdel Fattah al-Burhan. Al-Burhan has stated that the transfer of state authority is contingent upon a national consensus and that no proposal lacking the guarantee of stability and public satisfaction will be entertained. This stance underscores the fundamental disagreement regarding the sequence of security arrangements and the timing of the RSF's withdrawal.

機構立場依然僵化，這可從過渡主權委員會主席阿卜杜勒-法塔赫·布爾漢的言論中看出。布爾漢表示，權力移交取決於國家共識，任何缺乏穩定保障且不符合公眾滿意度的提案將不予考慮。這一立場凸顯了雙方在安全安排順序及 RSF 撤軍時機上的根本分歧。

The conflict remains unresolved as the Sudanese government ties the cessation of hostilities to the total disarmament of the RSF, amidst growing international pressure to prevent further civilian casualties.

由於蘇丹政府將停止敵對行動與 RSF 完全解除武裝掛鉤，且國際社會防止平民傷亡的壓力日益增加，衝突仍未獲得解決。