Newly released data from the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) suggests that the 2022 crash of a China Eastern Airlines Boeing 737-800 was the result of intentional cockpit interference.

美國國家運輸安全委員會 (NTSB) 最新公布的數據顯示，2022 年中國東方航空 Boeing 737-800 飛機失事是因為有人在駕駛艙內故意干擾。

The incident occurred on March 21, 2022, during a transit from Kunming to Guangzhou, resulting in 132 fatalities. Technical data recovered by the NTSB—facilitated by the American origin of the aircraft and engines—indicates that fuel switches for both engines were transitioned from the 'run' to the 'cut-off' position. Given the mechanical design of the Boeing 737, where fuel levers are locked to prevent inadvertent activation, aviation consultants such as John Cox assert that this action required deliberate manual intervention.

該事故發生於 2022 年 3 月 21 日，當時飛機由昆明飛往廣州，導致 132 人死亡。由於飛機與引擎均為美國原產，NTSB 恢復的技術數據顯示，兩台引擎的燃油開關均從「運行」切換至「切斷」位置。鑑於 Boeing 737 的機械設計，其燃油桿設有鎖定機制以防止誤觸，因此如 John Cox 等航空顧問主張，此操作需要刻意的手動干預。

Subsequent flight data reveals a steep descent from approximately 29,000 feet, characterized by a 360-degree roll and erratic control wheel movements. Former NTSB investigator Jeff Guzzetti posits that the oscillatory nature of these inputs suggests a physical or procedural struggle between cockpit occupants, as the movements appear to be counter-actions rather than smooth, singular maneuvers. While the cockpit voice recorder allegedly captured auditory evidence of a struggle, the NTSB has not released a transcript, as the primary jurisdiction for the final report remains with the Civil Aviation Administration of China.

隨後的飛行數據顯示，飛機從約 29,000 英呎高空急劇下降，並伴隨 360 度翻滾以及不規則的操縱輪動作。前 NTSB 調查員 Jeff Guzzetti 認為，這些輸入指令的震盪性質表明駕駛艙內的人員之間可能發生了肢體或程序上的爭執，因為這些動作看起來像是對抗行為，而非平滑的單一操縱。雖然據稱駕駛艙語音記錄器捕捉到了爭執的聲音證據，但 NTSB 尚未公布逐字稿，因為最終報告的主要管轄權仍屬於中國民用航空局。

This event has reignited institutional discourse regarding the psychological screening of flight crews. Industry experts note that the fear of losing medical certification and the subsequent loss of remuneration often deter pilots from seeking psychiatric assistance. This systemic reluctance is further compounded by national regulations in certain jurisdictions that prohibit the use of standard antidepressant medications for active flight personnel.

此事件重新激發了關於機組員心理篩查的體制性討論。業界專家指出，對失去醫療認證以及隨後失去薪酬的恐懼，往往使飛行員不敢尋求精神科協助。此外，某些司法管轄區的國家規定禁止在職飛行人員使用標準的抗抑鬱藥物， further 加劇了這種系統性的猶豫。

The aircraft's descent was likely intentional, though a definitive conclusion awaits the release of the official report from Chinese authorities.

飛機的下降很可能是故意的，但最終結論仍需等待中國官方公布正式報告。