Over 120 delivery drivers associated with Dragonfly, an Amazon contractor, have initiated a work stoppage in Saskatoon to protest compensation and safety standards.

超過120名與亞馬遜承包商Dragonfly 相關的配送司機在薩斯開敦發起停工，以抗議薪酬與安全標準。

The current industrial action is predicated upon a perceived deterioration of fiscal viability and occupational safety. Personnel allege a systematic reduction in per-package remuneration over the preceding six-month period, compounded by a mandatory 15 percent brokerage fee. Consequently, some operators report net earnings that fall below the statutory minimum wage. Furthermore, the classification of these individuals as independent contractors necessitates the internalization of all operational overheads, including vehicle maintenance, fuel, and insurance, while simultaneously denying access to workers' compensation and standard employment benefits.

此次工業行動是基於對財務可行性與職業安全惡化的感知。人員指稱，在過去六個月中，每件包裹的酬勞被系統性削減，且需支付15%的強制經紀費。因此，部分營運人員報告其淨收入低於法定最低工資。此外，由於這些人員被歸類為獨立承包商，必須自行承擔所有營運成本，包括車輛維修、燃料和保險，同時無法獲得勞工保險及標準僱傭福利。

Operational grievances extend to the physical exigencies of the role. Drivers report the imposition of rigorous schedules that preclude adequate sanitary breaks and the requirement to navigate hazardous winter weather and highway closures without institutional support. Instances of occupational injury, such as canine attacks, have reportedly been met with managerial directives to prioritize route completion over immediate medical intervention.

營運方面的不滿延伸至職位的體能需求。司機報告面臨嚴苛的行程安排，導致無法獲得充足的衛生休息時間，且在缺乏體制支持的情況下，必須在危險的冬季天氣與公路封閉中行駛。據報導，在發生職業傷害（如犬隻攻擊）時，管理層竟指示應優先完成配送路線，而非立即進行醫療干預。

From a regulatory perspective, the Saskatchewan Federation of Labour has intervened, advocating for a legislative reappraisal of the 'worker' definition within the Saskatchewan Employment Act. The Federation posits that the current gig-economy model facilitates the circumvention of basic labor protections. Conversely, Dragonfly has maintained a position of institutional detachment, asserting that the drivers are employed by third-party entities rather than by Dragonfly itself, thereby delegating the responsibility for scheduling and compensation to these intermediaries.

從監管角度來看，薩斯開敦勞工聯合會已介入，主張對《薩斯開敦僱傭法》中「工人」的定義進行立法重新評估。該聯合會認為，目前的零工經濟模式有助於規避基本的勞工保障。相反地，Dragonfly 則維持制度上的脫鉤立場，聲稱司機是由第三方實體而非 Dragonfly 本身僱傭，從而將排班與薪酬責任委託給這些中間機構。

The drivers remain prepared to resume operations contingent upon the commencement of formal negotiations with Dragonfly.

司機們仍準備在與 Dragonfly 開始正式談判後恢復營運。