The European Commission is coordinating technical discussions with the de facto Afghan authorities to facilitate the return of specific migrants, while European ministers are concurrently evaluating the implementation of third-country processing centers.

歐盟委員會正與阿富汗的事實當局協調技術討論，以促進特定移民回國，而歐盟各國部長則同步評估建立第三國處理中心的可行性。

The European Commission has extended an invitation to representatives of the Taliban for consultations in Brussels. This initiative serves as a follow-up to preliminary technical discussions conducted in Afghanistan in January. The impetus for these talks originated from a petition by 20 EU and Schengen member states, including Germany and Sweden, who cited a critical failure in repatriation rates; specifically, it was noted that only 2% of Afghan nationals issued return orders in 2024 were successfully deported. The Commission has specified that these efforts target individuals characterized as security threats or those with criminal convictions. Despite this engagement, the EU maintains that such technical cooperation does not constitute a formal diplomatic recognition of the Taliban's authority.

歐盟委員會已邀請塔利班代表前往布魯塞爾進行磋商。此舉是針對今年一月在阿富汗進行的初步技術討論之後續行動。這些談判的動力源於 20 個歐盟及申根成員國（包括德國與瑞典）的請願，他們指出遣返率嚴重失效；具體而言，2024 年收到遣返令的阿富汗國民中，僅有 2% 成功被驅逐出境。委員會明確指出，這些努力旨在針對被視為安全威脅或有刑事定罪的人士。儘管有此接觸，歐盟仍堅持此類技術合作並不構成對塔利班權威的正式外交承認。

Legal and humanitarian constraints complicate these repatriation efforts. The European Court of Justice ruled in 2024 that the Taliban's policies toward women constitute persecution, necessitating that all return decisions adhere to international fundamental rights frameworks. Furthermore, reports from the UNHCR indicate that millions of Afghans have been forcibly deported from neighboring states, often resulting in severe socio-economic deprivation.

法律與人道主義限制增加了這些遣返工作的複雜度。歐洲法院於 2024 年裁定，塔利班對女性的政策構成迫害，因此所有遣返決定必須符合國際基本權利框架。此外，聯合國難民署 (UNHCR) 的報告指出，數百萬阿富汗人被鄰國強行驅逐，往往導致嚴重的社會經濟匱乏。

Parallel to the Afghan negotiations, the Council of Europe is addressing the systemic difficulty of removing rejected asylum seekers. During a meeting in Moldova, ministers discussed the viability of 'return hubs' in third-party nations. Potential partner states under consideration include Rwanda, Ghana, Tunisia, and Uzbekistan, among others. This strategy is accompanied by a proposed political declaration intended to enhance national border control and limit the application of Articles 3 and 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), which pertain to the prohibition of torture and the right to family life. While the Secretary General of the Council of Europe, Alain Berset, emphasized that migrants on European soil remain under ECHR protection, the move reflects a broader institutional effort to address the discrepancy between deportation orders and actual removals, as Eurostat data indicates that fewer than half of ordered removals are executed annually.

與阿富汗談判平行地，歐洲委員會正處理驅逐被拒絕庇護申請者的系統性困難。在摩爾多瓦的一次會議中，各國部長討論了在第三國建立「遣返樞紐」的可行性。考慮中的潛在合作夥伴國家包括盧安達、加納、突尼西亞與烏茲別克斯坦等。該策略隨之提出了一份政治聲明擬議案，旨在強化國家邊境管制，並限制《歐洲人權公約》(ECHR) 第 3 條與第 8 條（涉及禁止酷刑與家庭生活權）的適用。雖然歐洲委員會秘書長 Alain Berset 強調，身處歐洲領土的移民仍受 ECHR 保護，但此舉反映了機構層面試圖解決遣返令與實際執行之間差距的廣泛努力，因為 Eurostat 的數據顯示，每年僅有不到一半的遣返令被執行。

The European Union is pursuing a dual strategy of targeted diplomatic engagement with the Taliban and the exploration of multilateral third-country hubs to increase the efficacy of migration removals.

歐盟正採取雙管齊下的策略：一方面與塔利班進行針對性外交接觸，另一方面探索建立多邊第三國樞紐，以提高遣返移民的成效。