Recent legal proceedings in Singapore have resulted in the sentencing of a medical practitioner for a fatal treatment error and a young adult for the possession of prohibited vaping products.

新加坡最近的法律程序中，一名醫療從業人員因致命治療錯誤被判刑，一名年輕人則因持有禁制電子煙產品而被判刑。

Regarding the case of Dr. Chan Bingyi, the judiciary has imposed an eighteen-month custodial sentence following the conviction of the defendant for a negligent act not amounting to culpable homicide. The court established that the administration of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) to a thirty-one-year-old patient, Lau Li Ting, was the sole and direct cause of her demise. The prosecution asserted that the substance was delivered at an excessive concentration and velocity, precipitating EDTA toxicity and subsequent cardiac arrest. The court noted a significant absence of clinical documentation and the willful concealment of the administered substance from medical responders, an action the presiding judge characterized as a measure of self-preservation.

關於陳炳儀醫生（Dr. Chan Bingyi）的案件，被告被裁定犯有不構成故意殺人的過失行為，法院判處其十八個月監禁。法院認定，為一名 31 歲的病人劉麗婷（Lau Li Ting）注射乙二胺四乙酸（EDTA）是導致其死亡的唯一直接原因。檢方主張該物質的濃度與注射速度過高，導致 EDTA 中毒並隨後心臟驟停。法院指出，臨床記錄嚴重缺失，且被告故意向醫療救護人員隱瞞注射物質，主審法官將此行為定性為一種自保措施。

While the defense posited that gastric residue discovered during autopsy might indicate the ingestion of slimming supplements, the prosecution maintained that no evidence supported such consumption prior to the incident. The court further rejected the defendant's claim that his initial admissions to the Ministry of Health were the result of a compromised mental state. Consequently, the court found that the defendant had disregarded the inherent risks of chelation therapy and failed to verify the patient's suitability for the procedure.

雖然辯方提出剖檢中發現的胃殘留物可能顯示其曾服用纖體補劑，但檢方堅持沒有證據支持事發前有此類服用行為。法院進一步駁回被告的聲稱，即他最初向衛生部承認事實是由於精神狀態不穩定。因此，法院認定被告無視螯合治療的內在風險，且未能核實病人是否適合接受該程序。

Parallel to these developments, a twenty-one-year-old female, Tan Xin Yi, has been ordered to undergo a minimum of twelve months of reformative training. This judicial decision follows two separate instances of possession of etomidate-laced vaping devices, termed 'Kpods,' at a specific establishment on Coleman Street. The Health Sciences Authority (HSA) indicated that the defendant was unsuitable for probation due to a high recidivism risk and a permissive domestic environment. The legal framework governing this offense is the Poisons Act 1938, which classifies etomidate as a poison.

與此同時，一名 21 歲女性陳欣怡（Tan Xin Yi）被命令接受至少十二個月的矯正訓練。此司法決定是基於其在克萊門特街（Coleman Street）的一家特定場所，兩次被發現持有含有依托咪酯（etomidate）的電子煙設備（稱為「Kpods」）。新加坡衛生科學局（HSA）表示，由於被告再犯風險高且家庭環境過於寬容，不適合採取緩刑。監管此類罪行的法律框架為《1938 年毒藥法令》，該法令將依托咪酯列為毒藥。

The Singaporean courts have concluded these matters with the imposition of imprisonment for the medical practitioner and reformative training for the individual possessing controlled substances.

新加坡法院已結案，對該名醫療從業人員處以監禁，並對持有管制藥物的人員處以矯正訓練。