The Board of Peace, an entity established by the United States to manage the reconstruction of the Gaza Strip, is currently experiencing a significant liquidity crisis and political deadlock.

和平委員會是由美國成立以管理加薩地帶重建的實體，目前正經歷嚴重的流動性危機與政治僵局。

The Board of Peace (BoP) is presently confronting a substantial discrepancy between pledged financial commitments and actual disbursements. While $17 billion was purportedly pledged, reports indicate that actual liquidity reaching the ground is negligible, with only the United Arab Emirates and Morocco having transferred funds. This fiscal instability is compounded by the BoP's governance structure, which is characterized by the inclusion of American billionaires and pro-Israel figures. Critics suggest that the 'pay-for-influence' model—wherein a $1 billion contribution grants a permanent seat—has fostered a perception of commercial guardianship rather than humanitarian assistance.

和平委員會 (BoP) 目前正面臨承諾財務撥款與實際支出之間的巨大差異。儘管據稱有 170 億美元的承諾，但報告指出實際到達前線的流動資金微乎其微，僅有阿拉伯聯合大公國與摩洛哥轉移了資金。這種財務不穩定性因 BoP 的治理結構而加劇，其特點是包含了美國億萬富翁與親以色列人物。批評者認為，這種「花錢買影響力」的模式——即捐款 10 億美元即可獲得永久席位——營造出一種商業監護而非人道援助的觀感。

Institutional friction is further exacerbated by the BoP's insistence on a phased implementation strategy. The administration maintains that the full disarmament of Hamas and associated factions is a non-negotiable prerequisite for the commencement of reconstruction and the transition to a technocratic administration, currently stationed in Egypt. Conversely, Hamas asserts that such demands are fallacious and ignore Israel's failure to adhere to ceasefire obligations. This deadlock is mirrored by the ongoing military presence of Israeli forces, who have reportedly expanded their territorial control to approximately 60% of the enclave, thereby undermining the viability of the proposed reconstruction projects.

BoP 堅持採取分階段實施策略，使制度摩擦進一步惡化。管理層主張，哈馬斯及相關派系全面解除武裝，是啟動重建以及過渡到目前駐紮在埃及的技術官僚行政體系之不可協商的前提條件。相反，哈馬斯則主張此類要求是謬論，且無視以色列未能遵守停火義務。這種僵局也反映在以色列軍隊的持續駐紮，據報導其領土控制範圍已擴大至該飛地的約 60%，從而削弱了擬議重建項目的可行性。

Historical antecedents suggest a pattern of under-fulfillment regarding Palestinian aid pledges, specifically noting that post-1993 Oslo Accord commitments were only partially met. Current observers argue that the absence of a defined political horizon for a Palestinian state renders the BoP's development plans—which include high-end real estate and smart cities—divorced from the humanitarian exigencies of the population. Consequently, the international community remains hesitant to fund infrastructure that is susceptible to recurring military destruction.

歷史先例顯示，對巴勒斯坦的援助承諾存在未完全履行之模式，特別是指出 1993 年《奧斯陸協議》後的承諾僅部分達成。目前的觀察家認為，由於巴勒斯坦建國缺乏明確的政治願景，使得 BoP 的開發計劃（包括高端房地產與智慧城市）與人口的人道急需脫節。因此，國際社會對於資助易受反覆軍事摧毀的基礎設施仍持猶豫態度。

The reconstruction of Gaza remains stalled due to a combination of funding shortfalls, unresolved security prerequisites, and the absence of a viable political framework.

由於資金短缺、尚未解決的安全前提以及缺乏可行的政治框架，加薩的重建依然停滯不前。