Recent developments indicate a divergence between municipal enforcement of census duties for government teachers and judicial restrictions on the deployment of private institution staff.

近期發展顯示，市政府強制政府教師執行普查職務，與司法限制調派私立機構員工之間存在分歧。

In Ludhiana, the municipal corporation (MC) has implemented stringent punitive measures against sixty-six educators from government institutions who failed to report for census obligations. The administration has mandated the withholding of salaries and the cessation of attendance recording until the issuance of a no-objection certificate. This directive is predicated on the classification of census work as a time-bound government assignment, where non-compliance is viewed as a disciplinary offense.

在盧底亞納，市政局（MC）對 66 名未就普查義務報到的政府機構教育工作者採取了嚴厲的懲罰措施。行政部門規定，在核發無異議證明書之前，將扣發薪資並停止記錄出勤。此指令是基於將普查工作歸類為有時限的政府任務，不遵守規定將被視為紀律違規。

Conversely, a conflict has emerged between the MC and teachers' unions. The unions contend that the administration is disregarding prior exemptions granted on medical or legitimate grounds. While Assistant Commissioner Jasdev Singh Sekhon maintains that only those with non-genuine exemptions were recalled to address staffing deficits, affected personnel report being removed from academic duties despite prior authorizations.

相反地，市政局與教師工會之間產生了衝突。工會主張行政部門無視先前基於醫療或正當理由而授予的豁免。儘管助理專員 Jasdev Singh Sekhon 主張僅召回豁免理由不實者以解決人手短缺，但受影響的人員反映，儘管先前已獲授權，他們仍被撤除教學職務。

Parallel to these administrative actions, the Allahabad High Court has addressed the legal parameters of the Census Act, 1948. In response to a petition by the Independent Self Financed Schools Association, the court stayed an order from the District Inspector of Schools in Gautam Budh Nagar. The judicial determination posits that staff from aided and unaided private institutions do not constitute 'local authorities' under Section 4A of the Act. Consequently, the court ruled that such personnel cannot be legally compelled to perform census tasks, requiring the state government to provide a counter-affidavit within a four-week window.

與這些行政行動平行，阿拉哈巴德高等法院處理了 1948 年《普查法》的法律範圍。針對獨立自籌資金學校協會的請願，法院暫停了高塔姆布德納加爾地區學校督學的指令。司法裁定認為，受助與非受助私立機構的員工不構成該法第 4A 條下的「地方當局」。因此，法院裁定不能合法強迫此類人員執行普查任務，並要求邦政府在四週內提供反對宣誓書。

While government educators face strict financial and professional sanctions for census absenteeism, private sector educational staff have secured a judicial stay against similar mandates.

當政府教育工作者因缺席普查而面臨嚴厲的財務與專業制裁時，私部門的教育員工則成功獲得司法暫緩，無需執行類似指令。