Senator Bernie Sanders and Representative Ro Khanna have introduced the Make Billionaires Pay Their Fair Share Act, a proposal to implement a wealth tax on the ultra-wealthy to fund direct payments to American families.

參議員 Bernie Sanders 與眾議員 Ro Khanna 提出了《讓億萬富翁支付公平份額法案》，擬對極高淨值人士徵收財富稅，以資助向美國家庭提供直接支付金。

The proposed legislation seeks to establish a 5% annual tax on the wealth of approximately 938 billionaires. The primary objective of this fiscal mechanism is the redistribution of capital to provide annual direct payments of up to $12,000 to working households, alongside increased funding for healthcare and education. Senator Sanders posits that this measure is a necessary response to a historical wealth transfer of $79 trillion from the bottom 90% of the population to the top 1% over the preceding five decades.

該擬議立法旨在對約 938 位億萬富翁徵收 5% 的年度財富稅。此財政機制的首要目標是重新分配資本，以向勞工家庭提供每年最高 12,000 美元的直接支付金，並增加醫療與教育的資金。Sanders 參議員認為，鑑於過去五十年內有 79 兆美元從底層 90% 的人口轉移至頂層 1% 的人口，此措施是必要的對策。

Stakeholder positioning reveals a significant divergence in economic philosophy. Proponents, including Maine Senate candidate Graham Platner, argue that such redistribution is essential to mitigate childhood poverty and senior economic instability. Conversely, critics and financial analysts suggest that direct payments may exacerbate inflationary pressures and fail to address systemic economic deficiencies. Furthermore, some experts argue that any newly generated revenue should be prioritized for the federal deficit and the Social Security trust fund rather than direct transfers.

利害關係人的定位顯示出經濟哲學上的顯著分歧。包括緬州參議院候選人 Graham Platner 在內的支持者認為，這種重新分配對於緩解兒童貧困和老年經濟不穩定至關重要。相反地，批評者與財務分析師指出，直接支付可能會加劇通貨膨脹壓力，且無法解決系統性的經濟缺陷。此外，部分專家主張，任何新產生的收入應優先用於償還聯邦赤字和社會安全信託基金，而非直接轉移支付。

Institutional opposition is exemplified by Amazon founder Jeff Bezos, who asserts that increased taxation on the ultra-wealthy would not resolve systemic inequality. Bezos attributes fiscal instability to government overspending rather than insufficient revenue. In response, Platner has characterized these assertions as efforts to preserve private wealth. This ideological conflict is increasingly integrated into the 2026 electoral cycle, with progressive candidates utilizing the proposal to challenge incumbents and advocate for a transition away from corporate-centric economic structures, particularly in the context of potential wealth concentration resulting from advancements in artificial intelligence and robotics.

亞馬遜創辦人 Jeff Bezos 代表了體制性的反對意見，他聲稱增加對極富人士的課稅並不能解決系統性不平等。Bezos 將財政不穩定歸因於政府過度支出，而非收入不足。對此，Platner 將這些主張定義為保護私人財富的企圖。這種意識形態衝突正日益融入 2026 年的選舉週期，進步派候選人利用該提案挑戰現任者，並倡導從以企業為中心的經濟結構轉型，特別是在人工智慧與機器人技術進步可能導致財富進一步集中的背景下。

The proposal remains a central point of contention between progressive legislators and critics who cite inflationary risks and fiscal mismanagement.

該提案仍是進步派立法者與批評者之間爭論的核心，後者援引了通貨膨脹風險與財政管理不善的問題。