The legal proceedings concerning the distribution of ketamine leading to the death of actor Matthew Perry have concluded with the sentencing of his personal assistant, Kenneth Iwamasa.

關於導致演員馬修·佩里死亡的氯胺酮分發法律程序，已隨著其私人助理 Kenneth Iwamasa 的判刑而告一段落。

The judicial resolution of this case involved five defendants who facilitated the illicit acquisition and administration of ketamine. The most severe penalty was imposed upon Jasveen Sangha, who received a 15-year sentence for operating a large-scale drug distribution network. Other medical and intermediary participants, including Dr. Salvador Plasencia and Erik Fleming, received sentences of 30 months and 24 months, respectively. Dr. Mark Chavez received eight months of home confinement. These disparate sentences reflect the varying degrees of culpability and the nature of each defendant's involvement in the supply chain.

本案的司法裁決涉及五名協助非法獲取與施用氯胺酮的被告。最嚴厲的懲罰是對 Jasveen Sangha 處以 15 年監禁，原因是其經營大規模毒品分發網絡。其他醫療及中間參與者，包括 Salvador Plasencia 醫生與 Erik Fleming，分別被判 30 個月與 24 個月監禁。Mark Chavez 醫生則被判居家監禁八個月。這些不同的判刑反映了每位被告的罪責程度及其在供應鏈中所扮演角色的性質。

Central to the administration of the substance was Kenneth Iwamasa, who served as Perry's live-in assistant with an annual salary of $150,000. Evidence established that Iwamasa acted as a primary enabler, procuring the drug via coded communications and administering multiple daily injections despite a lack of medical certification. The prosecution detailed a pattern of negligence, noting that Iwamasa continued administration even after Perry exhibited adverse physiological reactions. Iwamasa's initial obstruction of the investigation was later superseded by his cooperation, which rendered him a critical witness for the state.

藥物施用的核心人物是 Kenneth Iwamasa，他擔任佩里的住家助理，年薪 15 萬美元。證據顯示 Iwamasa 是主要促成者，他透過加密通訊獲取藥物，並在缺乏醫療認證的情況下每日進行多次注射。檢方詳述了其疏忽模式，指出即使佩里出現不良生理反應，Iwamasa 仍繼續施藥。Iwamasa 起初阻撓調查，但隨後轉為合作，使其成為州政府的關鍵證人。

Stakeholder positioning during the sentencing phase revealed a profound divergence in the interpretation of Iwamasa's agency. Defense counsel argued that a significant power imbalance existed, suggesting that Iwamasa's subordinate status rendered him unable to refuse his employer's directives. Conversely, the Perry family and estate executor characterized Iwamasa's conduct as a calculated betrayal of trust. They asserted that he exploited his position of influence to maintain a luxurious lifestyle while neglecting his primary responsibility to safeguard the actor's sobriety.

在判刑階段，相關利益方對 Iwamasa 的自主能動性解釋存在深刻分歧。辯護律師主張存在顯著的權力不對等，暗示 Iwamasa 的下屬地位使其無法拒絕僱主的指令。相反，佩里家族與遺產執行人將 Iwamasa 的行為描述為蓄意的背信。他們主張他利用其影響力地位來維持奢侈生活，卻忽略了維護該演員戒癮狀態的首要責任。

The case has reached its legal terminus following the sentencing of Kenneth Iwamasa to 41 months of incarceration, two years of supervised release, and a $10,000 fine.

隨著 Kenneth Iwamasa 被判處 41 個月監禁、兩年監督釋放以及 1 萬美元罰金，本案已達到法律終點。