The Canadian government intends to modify Bill C-22 to clarify the parameters of metadata retention and the protection of encrypted data following opposition from technology firms.

由於科技公司反對，加拿大政府打算修改 C-22 法案，以釐清元數據保留的參數以及加密數據的保護措施。

The legislative objective of Bill C-22 is the modernization of digital evidence acquisition to align Canadian capabilities with those of Five Eyes partners. Public Safety Minister Gary Anandasangaree asserts that the legislation is essential for law enforcement to mitigate criminal activity in a digital environment. While the bill permits the acquisition of basic subscriber information via judicial warrant, contention centers on provisions that would mandate the retention of core metadata—including transmission and location data—for durations up to one year. Furthermore, the Minister possesses the authority to compel provider adherence to these regulations without prior judicial authorization.

C-22 法案的立法目標是使數位證據獲取現代化，使加拿大的能力與「五眼聯盟」夥伴保持一致。公共安全部長 Gary Anandasangaree 主張，該立法對於執法部門在數位環境中減輕犯罪活動至關重要。雖然該法案允許透過司法令獲取基本訂閱者資訊，但爭議焦點在於要求保留核心元數據（包括傳輸與位置數據）長達一年的條款。此外，部長有權在無需事先司法授權的情況下，強制供應商遵守這些規定。

Opposition is led by major technology entities, specifically Apple and Google, who contend that the current drafting is overly broad. These stakeholders argue that the legislation could necessitate the introduction of systemic vulnerabilities, effectively compelling the compromise of end-to-end encryption. Apple's leadership has explicitly stated that the company will not implement 'back doors' into its products. Similarly, the messaging service Signal has indicated a preference for market withdrawal over compliance, citing the existential threat posed by engineered vulnerabilities. This friction is further compounded by U.S. legislative concerns, where representatives suggest that the bill forces a choice between compromising global user security or facing exclusion from the Canadian market.

反對力量由 Apple 和 Google 等大型科技實體領導，他們認為目前的草案內容過於寬泛。這些利害關係人主張，該立法可能會導致系統性漏洞的引入，實際上是強迫妥協端對端加密。Apple 的領導層已明確表示，公司不會在其產品中設置「後門」。同樣地，通訊服務 Signal 表示寧願退出市場也不願遵守，理由是人為漏洞構成了生存威脅。美國立法機關的擔憂進一步加劇了這種摩擦，代表們指出，該法案迫使公司在妥協全球用戶安全或面臨被排除在加拿大市場之外之間做出選擇。

In response to these critiques, Minister Anandasangaree has characterized the opposition as the dissemination of misinformation and has questioned the transparency of corporate privacy protocols. Despite previous hesitations to commit to specific textual changes, the Minister has now stated that amendments will be introduced to explicitly protect encryption and define the scope of retainable metadata. He maintains that the one-year retention period is consistent with international standards, notwithstanding observations that certain allies, such as the United States, do not employ identical mandates.

針對這些批評，Anandasangaree 部長將反對意見定調為散佈錯誤資訊，並質疑企業私隱協定的透明度。儘管先前對承諾具體文字修改有所猶豫，但部長現在表示將引入修正案，以明確保護加密技術並定義可保留元數據的範圍。他堅持一年的保留期符合國際標準，儘管有觀察指出某些盟友（如美國）並未採用相同的強制要求。

The Canadian government seeks to finalize and pass the amended legislation before the summer parliamentary recess.

加拿大政府尋求在夏季議會休會前，完成並通過修訂後的立法。