A federal legal dispute has emerged concerning the permanent addition of President Donald Trump's name to the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts and the proposed temporary cessation of its operations.

目前出現了一場聯邦法律爭議，涉及將總統川普的名字永久加入約翰-肯尼地表演藝術中心，以及擬議暫停其營運的計畫。

The current litigation was initiated in December 2025 by Representative Joyce Beatty, who asserts that the board's decision to rename the institution constitutes an extra-legal exercise of personal preference. Representative Beatty contends that the authority to modify the institution's designation resides exclusively with Congress. Furthermore, the plaintiff challenges the administration's proposal to suspend center operations for a twenty-four-month period to facilitate structural restoration and seating upgrades.

本次訴訟由眾議員 Joyce Beatty 於 2025 年 12 月發起，她主張董事會決定為該機構更名的決定，屬於基於個人偏好的非法行使權力。Beatty 議員認為，修改機構名稱的權限僅屬於國會。此外，原告亦挑戰管理層擬議暫停中心營運 24 個月的方案，該方案旨在進行結構修復與座位升級。

In response to these challenges, Executive Director Charles Matthew Floca has submitted a judicial declaration emphasizing the fiscal interdependence of the institution and the President. Floca posits that the removal of the presidential nomenclature would precipitate a severance of critical philanthropic conduits, noting that tens of millions of dollars have been secured and an additional $150 billion has been pledged over a biennial period. The administration maintains that such a divestment would render the center's artistic programming and general operations financially nonviable.

針對這些挑戰，執行董事 Charles Matthew Floca 提交了一份司法聲明，強調該機構與總統之間存在財務上的相互依賴。Floca 指出，移除總統的名稱將導致關鍵慈善管道的中斷，並指出已獲得數千萬美元資金，且在兩年期內另有 1,500 億美元的捐款承諾。管理層堅持認為，若失去這類投資，中心的藝術項目與一般營運將在財務上無法維持。

Judicial intervention has been partial; in March, Judge Christopher Cooper mandated that Representative Beatty be afforded a substantive opportunity for input, although the core legality of the renaming remains unresolved. Parallel to these legal proceedings, the administration has signaled a programmatic shift intended to diminish 'woke culture' in favor of broader audience appeal. Public sentiment, as quantified by a December 2025 YouGov survey, indicates a significant lack of consensus, with 66 percent of respondents expressing disapproval of the rebranding effort.

司法干預目前僅部分到位；今年 3 月，法官 Christopher Cooper 裁定必須賦予 Beatty 議員實質的參與機會，儘管更名的核心合法性問題仍未解決。與法律程序平行地，管理層已表明將調整計畫方向，意圖減少「覺醒文化」以吸引更廣泛的受眾。根據 2025 年 12 月 YouGov 的調查顯示，公眾看法缺乏共識，66% 的受訪者對此次品牌重塑表示反對。

The institution remains operational pending a scheduled closure following the Fourth of July, while the judiciary continues to evaluate the legality of the renaming and the necessity of the proposed renovations.

該機構目前仍維持營運，直到 7 月 4 日後按計畫關閉，而司法部門將繼續評估更名的合法性以及擬議翻新工程的必要性。