The United States government has implemented a series of bilateral agreements to deport asylum seekers to third-party nations, while simultaneously pursuing criminal litigation against foreign nationals for immigration fraud and historical conspiracies.

美國政府已實施一系列雙邊協議，將尋庇護者驅逐至第三方國家，同時針對外籍人士的移民欺詐及歷史陰謀採取刑事訴訟。

The Trump administration has established a network of 'Third-Country Removal Agreements,' facilitating the transfer of noncitizens to nations such as Equatorial Guinea and the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC). These arrangements, often characterized by legal advocates as clandestine, involve the payment of significant sums—exemplified by a $7.5 million agreement with Equatorial Guinea—to secure the reception of deportees. In Equatorial Guinea, the Bamy Hotel has been repurposed as a detention facility for individuals who had previously been granted protection by U.S. judicial authorities. Reports indicate that these detainees face psychological pressure and inconsistent medical care, with many subsequently forced into onward removal to their countries of origin despite risks of persecution.

川普政府建立了一個「第三國驅逐協議」網絡，便利將非公民轉移至赤道幾內亞和剛果民主共和國（DRC）等國家。這些安排經常被法律倡導者描述為秘密進行，且涉及支付巨額款項——例如與赤道幾內亞簽署的一份 750 萬美元協議——以確保對方接收被驅逐者。在赤道幾內亞，Bamy 酒店被改建為拘留設施，用於關押先前已獲得美國司法機關保護的人士。報告指出，這些被拘留者面臨心理壓力且醫療照護不穩定，許多人隨後儘管面臨被迫害的風險，仍被強迫遣返回原籍國。

Parallelly, the administration has expanded this framework to include the DRC, where deportees are reportedly subjected to restrictive transport conditions and substandard housing. The Open Society Justice Initiative asserts that these protocols constitute an evasion of non-refoulement obligations, effectively outsourcing the removal of protected persons to states lacking robust asylum infrastructures. While some federal courts have attempted to mandate notification and fear-based claims for deportees, the Supreme Court has frequently vacated such injunctions, thereby sustaining the operational viability of these transfers. The administration, via the State Department, maintains that these measures are essential to curtailing illegal immigration.

與此同時，政府將此框架擴展至剛果民主共和國，據報導被驅逐者在該地面臨受限的運輸條件與不合格的住房。開放社會正義倡議（Open Society Justice Initiative）主張，這些協議構成對「不強制遣返」義務的逃避，實際上將受保護人士的驅逐工作外包給缺乏完善庇護基礎設施的國家。雖然部分聯邦法院嘗試強制要求通知被驅逐者並允許其提出基於恐懼的申索，但最高法院經常撤銷此類禁制令，從而維持了這些轉移操作的可行性。政府透過國務院堅稱，這些措施對於遏制非法移民至關重要。

Concurrent with these policy shifts, the U.S. judiciary continues to address individual cases of immigration fraud linked to historical geopolitical conflicts. Luis Raúl González-Pardo Rodríguez, a former Cuban military pilot, was recently sentenced to seven months' imprisonment for concealing his military background during a permanent residency application. This case is distinct from a separate, pending indictment alleging González-Pardo Rodríguez's involvement in the 1996 shoot-down of civilian aircraft belonging to the 'Brothers to the Rescue' group, an action attributed to the administration of Raúl Castro.

在這些政策轉向的同時，美國司法部門繼續處理與歷史地緣政治衝突相關的個別移民欺詐案件。前古巴軍方飛行員 Luis Raúl González-Pardo Rodríguez 最近因在申請永久居留權時隱瞞軍方背景，被判處七個月監禁。此案與另一件待決的起訴書不同，後者指控 González-Pardo Rodríguez 參與了 1996 年擊落「救援兄弟會」（Brothers to the Rescue）平民飛機的行動，該行動被歸因於勞爾·卡斯特羅政府。

The U.S. continues to utilize third-country agreements to expedite removals while maintaining rigorous legal prosecution of foreign nationals involved in fraud or state-sponsored violence.

美國繼續利用第三國協議以加速驅逐，同時對涉及欺詐或國家支持暴力的外籍人士維持嚴格的法律起訴。