A federal judge has issued a temporary injunction halting the operation of a $1.776 billion fund designed to compensate individuals alleging political persecution by the federal government.

一名聯邦法官已發布臨時禁制令，暫停一項 17.76 億美元基金的運作，該基金旨在補償聲稱遭到聯邦政府政治迫害的人士。

The Anti-Weaponization Fund was established as a primary component of a settlement between President Donald Trump, his family, and the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) to resolve a $10 billion lawsuit regarding the unauthorized disclosure of tax records. This agreement provides the Trump family with permanent immunity from audits of historical returns and prohibits further legal action against them for past conduct. The fund's administration is vested in a five-member commission appointed by the Attorney General, with the President retaining the authority to remove members without cause. Funding is sourced from the Judgment Fund, a perpetual Treasury appropriation.

「反武器化基金」是總統川普、其家人與美國國稅局（IRS）達成協議的核心部分，旨在解決一起關於未經授權披露稅務記錄、涉案金額達 100 億美元的訴訟。該協議使川普家族在歷史申報表的審核方面獲得永久豁免，並禁止針對其過去行為採取進一步法律行動。基金由司法部長任命的五人委員會管理，總統保留在無需理由的情況下撤換委員的權限。資金來源為判決基金（Judgment Fund），即一項永久性的財政部撥款。

Legal challenges have been initiated by various entities, including former federal prosecutor Andrew Floyd and the advocacy group Democracy Forward. U.S. District Judge Leonie Brinkema has barred the Department of Justice from transferring assets or processing claims until a hearing on June 12, citing the necessity of maintaining the status quo to prevent irreversible disbursements. Plaintiffs contend that the fund lacks congressional authorization and constitutes a partisan mechanism for rewarding political allies, specifically those involved in the January 6 Capitol events. Furthermore, tax experts have debated whether the settlement constitutes taxable income for the President, despite administration claims that no economic benefit was derived.

包括前聯邦檢察官 Andrew Floyd 及倡議組織 Democracy Forward 在內的多個實體已發起法律挑戰。美國地方法官 Leonie Brinkema 已禁止司法部在 6 月 12 日聆訊前轉移資產或處理申請，理由是必須維持現狀以防止不可逆轉的款項支出。原告方主張該基金缺乏國會授權，且構成一個獎勵政治盟友（特別是參與 1 月 6 日國會山莊事件者）的黨派機制。此外，稅務專家就該協議是否構成總統的應課稅收入展開爭論，儘管行政部門聲稱並未獲取任何經濟利益。

Simultaneously, the fund has precipitated a divergence within the Republican party. A contingent of senators, termed a 'YOLO caucus' due to their status as lame-ducks or political independence, has expressed opposition to the fund, characterizing it as a 'slush fund.' This internal friction has resulted in the legislative stalling of a $70 billion immigration-enforcement bill and the reduction of funding for a White House ballroom project. This shift in legislative dynamics suggests a diminishing capacity for the executive to ensure absolute party cohesion, particularly as some lawmakers prioritize electoral viability over presidential alignment.

與此同時，該基金引起了共和黨內部的分歧。一群被稱為「YOLO 黨團」的參議員（因其身為跛鴨議員或政治獨立之身份）對該基金表示反對，將其定性為「秘密基金」。這種內部摩擦導致一項 700 億美元的移民執法法案在立法上停滯，並削減了白宮舞廳項目的資金。立法動態的轉變表明，行政部門確保絕對黨內凝聚力的能力正在下降，特別是部分立法者將選舉可行性置於與總統保持一致之上。

The Anti-Weaponization Fund remains frozen pending further judicial review, while the administration faces increasing legislative resistance from within its own party.

「反武器化基金」在等待進一步司法覆核期間仍處於凍結狀態，而行政部門則面臨來自其自身黨內日益增加的立法阻力。