Candace Owens and Laura Loomer have engaged in a public dispute involving accusations of data breaches, financial inconsistency, and legal irregularities.

Candace Owens 與 Laura Loomer 陷入了一場公開爭執，涉及數據洩漏、財務矛盾以及法律違規的指控。

The conflict commenced with allegations from Ms. Owens that Ms. Loomer utilized a third party—specifically a fiancé employed in information technology—to illicitly acquire private data, resulting in the disclosure of the Owens family's vehicles. Ms. Owens characterized these actions as stalking and criminal hacking. Conversely, Ms. Loomer asserted that the information in question was retrieved from public records, including trust documents and arrest reports.

衝突始於 Owens 女士的指控，她稱 Loomer 女士利用第三方——具體來說是一位從事資訊科技工作的未婚夫——非法獲取私隱數據，導致 Owens 家族的車輛資訊被洩露。Owens 女士將這些行為定義為跟蹤與刑事駭客入侵。相反地，Loomer 女士主張相關資訊是從公開記錄（包括信託文件與逮捕報告）中獲取的。

Subsequent escalations involved the legal and migratory status of Mr. George Farmer, the spouse of Ms. Owens. Ms. Loomer alleged that Mr. Farmer was involved in a driving-under-the-influence (DUI) incident while holding a green card, suggesting that such an event may have implications for his naturalization process. She further advocated for a formal investigation into potential immigration fraud. Ms. Owens responded to these claims through the use of sarcasm, framing the accusations as baseless and dismissing the possibility of deportation.

隨後的升級涉及 Owens 女士的配偶 George Farmer 先生的法律與移民身份。Loomer 女士指稱 Farmer 先生在持有綠卡期間涉及酒後駕車 (DUI) 事件，暗示此事件可能會影響其入籍程序。她進一步主張應對潛在的移民欺詐進行正式調查。Owens 女士以諷刺方式回應這些指控，將其定調為毫無根據，並否認被驅逐出境的可能性。

Furthermore, Ms. Loomer challenged the financial transparency of Ms. Owens. By contrasting the alleged acquisition of a high-value Range Rover with Ms. Owens' public solicitations for legal funding and merchandise sales, Ms. Loomer posited a contradiction between the latter's private assets and her public appeals for financial support. Ms. Loomer characterized this behavior as indicative of a 'grifter' persona, alleging that the Owens household possesses assets valued at approximately one million dollars.

此外，Loomer 女士質疑 Owens 女士的財務透明度。透過將據稱購買高價值 Range Rover 的行為，與 Owens 女士公開籌集法律基金及銷售周邊產品對比，Loomer 女士認為後者的私人資產與其公開呼籲財務支持之間存在矛盾。Loomer 女士將此行為定性為「騙子」 (grifter) 的特徵，並聲稱 Owens 家中擁有價值約一百萬美元的資產。

The dispute remains unresolved, characterized by reciprocal accusations of dishonesty and calls for legal accountability.

該爭議仍未解決，其特徵是雙方相互指責不誠實並要求法律追究。