The Haryana Human Rights Commission (HHRC) has requested formal reports from health authorities following an incident where a woman allegedly delivered a child in a public parking area outside a government health facility.

在一名女性據稱於政府醫療機構外的公共停車場分娩的事件後，哈里亞納邦人權委員會（HHRC）已要求衛生部門提交正式報告。

The proceedings were initiated by Chairperson Justice Lalit Batra following a complaint and media reports concerning events that occurred during the night of May 15-16 at the Government Primary Health Centre in Sector 3, Ballabhgarh. It is alleged that upon arrival, the patient encountered a closed main gate and a lack of available emergency medical personnel, necessitating the delivery of the infant in an open-air parking space utilizing torchlight. The HHRC noted that the reported necessity for attendants to secure a wheelchair and the subsequent delay in staff intervention suggest a significant lapse in institutional care.

本次調查是由主席 Lalit Batra 法官在收到關於 5 月 15 日至 16 日夜晚於 Ballabhgarh 第三區政府初級衛生中心發生事件的投訴與媒體報導後發起。據稱病人抵達時發現正門關閉且缺乏可用之緊急醫療人員，導致嬰兒必須在露天停車場利用手電筒照明下分娩。HHRC 指出，陪同人員需尋找輪椅以及隨後職員介入延遲的情況，顯示出機構護理存在嚴重缺失。

From a regulatory perspective, the Commission highlighted a discrepancy between the state's assertions regarding the implementation of the Janani Shishu Suraksha Karyakram (JSSK)—which mandates free, cashless institutional delivery—and the reported deprivation of such services. The HHRC posited that if these allegations are substantiated, they would constitute a prima facie violation of Article 21 of the Constitution, specifically regarding the rights to life, dignity, and emergency medical assistance. Consequently, the Commission has mandated the Additional Chief Secretary of Health and Family Welfare to delineate policies for 24-hour emergency maternal care, while the Director General of Health Services must clarify staffing levels and the adherence to obstetric protocols during the incident. Furthermore, the Civil Surgeon of Faridabad has been tasked with justifying the denial of JSSK benefits and addressing the potential for compensatory recommendations.

從監管角度來看，委員會強調了州政府關於實施「孕產婦及新生兒安全計劃」（JSSK）——該計劃規定提供免費、無現金的機構分娩——之主張，與報告中被剝奪此類服務的情況之間存在矛盾。HHRC 認為，若這些指控屬實，將構成對憲法第 21 條的初步違反，特別是關於生命權、尊嚴及緊急醫療援助的權利。因此，委員會要求衛生及家庭福利額外首席秘書詳細說明 24 小時緊急孕產護理政策，而衛生服務總局局長則必須澄清事件當時的人手水平以及是否遵守產科醫療流程。此外，法里德巴德的衛生局長亦被要求解釋拒絕提供 JSSK 福利的原因，並處理可能的補償建議。

The relevant administrative and medical authorities are required to submit their detailed findings to the Commission prior to the scheduled hearing on August 19.

相關行政與醫療部門必須在 8 月 19 日預定聆訊前，將詳細調查結果提交至委員會。