Levi Williams has been sentenced to three years of imprisonment following the manslaughter of Richard Wingrove in Newmarket, Suffolk.

Levi Williams 因為在薩福克郡的紐馬基特誤殺了 Richard Wingrove，被判處三年監禁。

The incident originated on March 8, 2025, at the Waggon and Horses establishment. Evidence presented at Peterborough Crown Court indicated that Richard Wingrove and his son, Jamie Wingrove, were expelled from the premises following disorderly conduct toward staff. Mr. Williams and an associate, both jockeys, were present during these initial disturbances. Subsequent to the departure of all parties from the venue, a verbal confrontation transpired, which escalated into a physical altercation.

此事件於 2025 年 3 月 8 日發生在 Waggon and Horses establishment。彼得伯勒刑事法院提交的證據顯示，Richard Wingrove 及其兒子 Jamie Wingrove 因對員工行為不端而被驅逐出店。Williams 先生及其一名同事（兩者皆為騎師）當時在場目擊了最初的騷亂。在所有當事人離開場地後，雙方發生口角，隨後升級為肢體衝突。

According to prosecutorial testimony, Mr. Williams delivered multiple strikes to both Jamie and Richard Wingrove. The latter, a 71-year-old individual utilizing a walking stick, suffered a fall resulting in a skull fracture and cerebral hemorrhage. Despite medical intervention and the administration of an induced coma at a Cambridge facility, Mr. Wingrove succumbed to his injuries on March 18, 2025. Upon apprehension, the defendant exhibited signs of intoxication and tested positive for cocaine.

根據檢察方的證詞，Williams 先生多次擊打 Jamie 和 Richard Wingrove。後者是一名 71 歲且使用行走柺杖的人士，因跌倒導致頭蓋骨骨折及腦出血。儘管劍橋的一家醫療機構進行了醫療干預並使其進入人工昏迷狀態，但 Wingrove 先生仍於 2025 年 3 月 18 日因傷重不治。被告在被捕時顯示出醉酒跡象，且古柯鹼測試呈陽性。

Judicial deliberation by Judge Sean Enright acknowledged that while the initial physical responses may have been consistent with self-defense, the final strike delivered to the vulnerable victim was unjustifiable. The court noted that the defendant had the opportunity to withdraw from the conflict. Mitigating counsel asserted that the defendant possessed no prior history of violent behavior; however, the court determined that the combination of substance impairment and the vulnerability of the victim necessitated a custodial sentence.

法官 Sean Enright 在裁決中承認，雖然最初的肢體反應可能符合正當防衛，但對脆弱受害者造成的最後一次擊打是不合理的。法院指出，被告有機會撤出衝突。辯護律師主張被告先前並無暴力行為記錄；然而，法院認定，物質藥物影響與受害者的脆弱狀態之結合，使得監禁判決成為必要。

The legal proceedings concluded with a three-year prison term for Mr. Williams.

法律程序結束，Williams 先生被判處三年監禁。