The Nova Scotia Department of Education has excised Ernest Hemingway's 1927 short story, 'The Killers,' from a Grade 12 online English course after the identification of repeated racial slurs within the text.

新省教育局在一個 12 年級的英文在線課程中，刪除了海明威 1927 年的短篇小說《殺手》，原因是發現文本中反覆出現種族歧視用語。

The literary work in question was positioned as an optional reading selection within a self-guided module of the Independent Online Learning program. The text contains twelve instances of a derogatory term for Black individuals, appearing without redaction or preparatory warnings for the students. The removal of the material was precipitated by a formal inquiry from a parent and subsequent journalistic scrutiny by CBC News.

該文學作品原被列為「獨立在線學習」計畫中一個自導模組的可選閱讀項目。文中包含 12 處針對黑人的貶義詞，且未經刪減或對學生提供預先警告。

Institutional protocols for the selection of sensitive materials ostensibly require a bias evaluation and the implementation of specific pedagogical strategies, including the provision of historical context and the preparation of students for controversial content. While the Department of Education maintains that consultants review resources to ensure alignment with best practices, it has declined to confirm whether these specific guidelines were applied to the inclusion of 'The Killers.' Notably, other texts containing limited use of the same slur, such as the Autobiography of Malcolm X, remain authorized for use in different grade levels.

機構在選擇敏感教材的協議中，表面上要求進行偏見評估並實施特定的教學策略，包括提供歷史背景以及讓學生為爭議性內容做好準備。雖然教育局堅稱有顧問審查資源以確保符合最佳實踐，但拒絕確認這些特定指南是否應用於《殺手》的納入。值得注意的是，其他包含少量相同歧視詞的文本（如《馬爾庫姆 X 自傳》）在不同年級仍獲准使用。

Stakeholders within the Black community and academia have characterized the inclusion of the text as a failure of institutional oversight. Critics, including former departmental strategists and university faculty, posit that the absence of a rigorous bias evaluation exacerbates systemic distrust and perpetuates dehumanization. The discourse emphasizes that the failure to adhere to established sensitivity protocols may result in psychological trauma for students and reflects a broader institutional deficiency in addressing systemic racism.

黑人群體與學術界的利害關係人將納入該文本定性為機構監管的失敗。包括前部門策略師與大學教職在內的批評者認為，缺乏嚴謹的偏見評估會加劇系統性的不信任，並使非人化現象持續。論述強調，未能遵守既定的敏感度協議可能會對學生造成心理創傷，並反映出機構在應對系統性種族主義方面存在更廣泛的缺陷。

The Department of Education has removed the story, though it remains silent on the specific administrative failures that led to its initial inclusion.

教育局已將該故事移除，但對於導致最初納入課程的具體行政失敗仍保持沉默。