The Collin County court has commenced the murder trial of 19-year-old Karmelo Anthony, who is accused of the April 2, 2025, fatal stabbing of 17-year-old Austin Metcalf during a high school athletic event in Frisco, Texas.

柯林縣法院已開始審理 19 歲的 Karmelo Anthony 的謀殺案。他被指控於 2025 年 4 月 2 日，在德州弗里斯科的一場高中體育活動中，刺死 17 歲的 Austin Metcalf。

The prosecution's thesis posits that the incident constituted an unjustified and provoked homicide. Evidence presented includes surveillance footage of an altercation originating from a dispute over seating within a team tent, as well as testimony from a student witness who alleged that Metcalf initiated physical contact by pushing Anthony, prompting the defendant to utilize a five-inch folding knife. The state further introduced a 911 recording and testimony from athletic staff, including Coach Joshua Rebmann and trainer Tiffany Whiteaker, detailing the unsuccessful attempts to resuscitate Metcalf via CPR and an automated external defibrillator.

控方的論點認為，此事件構成一宗不合理且受挑釁的謀殺。提交的證據包括一段監視錄像，顯示兩人因隊伍帳篷內的座位問題而起爭執，以及一名學生證人的證詞，指稱 Metcalf 先以推擠 Anthony 啟動肢體接觸，導致被告使用了一把五英寸的摺疊刀。州方進一步提交了 911 錄音及體育工作人員（包括總教練 Joshua Rebmann 和訓練師 Tiffany Whiteaker）的證詞，詳細描述嘗試透過 CPR 和自動體外心臟除顫器搶救 Metcalf 但未能成功的情況。

Conversely, the defense maintains that the defendant acted in self-defense, citing a significant disparity in physical stature between the two parties. Counsel for Anthony argues that the defendant's actions were a reflexive response to a state of fear and chaos. This legal strategy necessitates the establishment of a factual basis for self-defense to secure specific jury instructions.

相反地，辯方主張被告屬正當防衛，並引用兩人之間顯著的體型差異。Anthony 的律師認為被告的行為是對恐懼與混亂狀態的反射性反應。此法律策略必須建立正當防衛的事實基礎，以確保陪審團獲得特定的指示。

Procedural controversies have emerged regarding the composition of the jury, which contains no Black members. The defense initiated a Batson challenge, asserting that Black prospective jurors were disproportionately excluded. The prosecution countered that these exclusions were based on professional affiliations—specifically, a desire to avoid jurors employed in education—a position upheld by Judge John Roach Jr. External tensions have manifested as verbal altercations between supporters of the parties outside the courthouse, leading to the removal of several individuals for protocol violations.

關於陪審團組成出現了程序爭議，因其成員中沒有黑人。辯方發起了 Batson 挑戰，主張黑人潛在陪審員被排除的比例過高。控方則反駁這些排除是基於專業背景——具體而言是希望避免由教育業從業人員擔任陪審員——此立場獲得了法官 John Roach Jr. 的支持。外部緊張局勢則體現為法院外支持雙方的人士之間發生的言語衝突，導致數名個體因違反規約而被移除。

The trial remains in progress, with the defendant facing a potential sentence of five years to life imprisonment if the claim of self-defense is rejected.

審理仍在進行中，若正當防衛的主張被駁回，被告可能面臨五年至終身監禁的刑期。