Expansion of the Department of Defense 1260H List Regarding Chinese Military-Affiliated Entities
美國國防部擴大關於中國軍方相關實體的 1260H 名單
Introduction
The United States Department of Defense has augmented its registry of Chinese companies deemed to support the People's Republic of China's military industrial base.
美國國防部擴充了被認為支持中華人民共和國軍事工業基礎的中國公司名單。
Main Body
The current iteration of the 1260H list, established via the 2021 National Defense Authorization Act, now encompasses 188 entities, representing a quantitative increase from the approximately 130 listed in the preceding year. This expansion is characterized by the inclusion of non-state enterprises that do not traditionally operate within the defense sector. Notable additions include the technology conglomerate Alibaba, the search engine Baidu, and the electric vehicle manufacturer BYD, all of which the Pentagon asserts are affiliated with the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology. Furthermore, the robotics firm Unitree was designated following the Department's determination that the entity received strategic government assistance as a critical supply chain component.
目前的 1260H 名單是根據 2021 年《國防授權法案》建立的，現涵蓋 188 個實體，較前一年的約 130 個有所增加。此次擴張的特點在於納入了傳統上不在國防部門運作的非國有企業。顯著的新增對象包括科技巨頭阿里巴巴、搜尋引擎百度以及電動車製造商比亞迪，五角大廈聲稱這些公司均與工業和資訊化部有關。此外，國防部認定宇樹科技（Unitree）作為關鍵供應鏈組成部分而獲得政府戰略援助，因此將其列入名單。
Beyond the technology sector, the Department of Defense has targeted the automotive and sensor industries, adding Nio, CALB Group, EVE Energy, and Robosense. The inclusion of these entities reflects a broader strategic apprehension regarding the utilization of civilian-facing research and commercial expertise for military advancement. While these designations preclude the entities from securing U.S. defense contracts, they do not prohibit general commercial activity within the United States, although they may precipitate further regulatory restrictions and reputational attrition.
除了科技部門，國防部還針對汽車和感測器產業，將蔚來（Nio）、中創新航（CALB Group）、億華能源（EVE Energy）及 Robosense 列入其中。將這些實體納入名單，反映出對於將面向消費者的研究與商業專業知識用於軍事進步的更廣泛戰略憂慮。雖然這些指定令會禁止相關實體獲取美國國防合約，但並不禁止其在美國境內進行一般商業活動，儘管這可能會導致進一步的監管限制與聲譽受損。
Diplomatic responses to these measures have been adversarial. The Chinese Embassy characterized the U.S. actions as an overextension of national security concepts and a manifestation of discriminatory practices. Conversely, the U.S. administration has integrated these listings with other economic instruments, such as tariffs on imported electric vehicles, to mitigate the perceived security risks associated with Chinese technological integration.
外交上對這些措施的反應相當對立。中國大使館將美國的行動描述為國家安全概念的過度擴張以及歧視性做法的體現。相反，美國政府將這些名單與其他經濟手段（如對進口電動車徵收關稅）相結合，以降低與中國技術整合相關的感知安全風險。
Conclusion
The Department of Defense has increased the number of sanctioned Chinese entities to 188, further restricting the intersection of U.S. defense procurement and Chinese commercial technology.
國防部將受制裁的中國實體數量增加到 188 個，進一步限制美國國防採購與中國商業技術的交集。
Vocabulary Learning
The Architecture of Nominalization and 'Abstract Weight'
To transcend the B2 plateau and enter the C2 stratum, a learner must move beyond describing actions and begin conceptualizing states. The provided text is a masterclass in Nominalization—the process of turning verbs (actions) or adjectives (qualities) into nouns to create an objective, authoritative, and dense academic tone.
⚡ The Linguistic Shift: From Event to Entity
Consider the difference in cognitive load and perceived authority between these two constructions:
- B2 approach (Verb-centric): The US is worried because China uses commercial research to help its military.
- C2 approach (Nominalized): *"...a broader strategic apprehension regarding the utilization of civilian-facing research... for military advancement."
In the C2 version, the action (worrying) becomes a concept (apprehension), and the act of using something (utilizing) becomes a system (utilization). This shifts the focus from the actor to the phenomenon.
🔍 Deconstructing the 'High-Density' Phrases
Observe how the text clusters nouns to create complex meanings without needing multiple sentences:
-
"Reputational attrition"
- Analysis: Instead of saying "their reputation will slowly get worse," the author uses attrition (a military term for wearing down). This is a lexical collocation that elevates the register from general English to specialized geopolitical discourse.
-
"Quantitative increase"
- Analysis: Rather than "more companies," the author specifies the nature of the increase. At C2, precision is paramount. You do not just have 'more'; you have a quantitative expansion.
-
"Intersection of U.S. defense procurement and Chinese commercial technology"
- Analysis: The word intersection acts as a conceptual anchor, replacing a clunky explanation of how two different sectors meet and conflict.
🛠️ C2 Strategy: The 'Sustained Abstraction' Technique
To implement this in your own writing, avoid starting sentences with people (The government, The company). Instead, start with the result of their action:
- Instead of: "The government restricted the companies, which made the embassy angry."
- Try: "The imposition of restrictions precipitated an adversarial diplomatic response."
Key C2 Markers used here:
- Precipitate (v): To cause something to happen suddenly.
- Imposition (n): The act of establishing a rule/restriction.
- Adversarial (adj): Characterized by conflict.