Gordon S. Wood, a Pulitzer Prize-winning historian and professor emeritus at Brown University, died at age 92 after being struck by a vehicle in Rhode Island.

普立茲獎得主、布朗大學名譽教授 Gordon S. Wood 在羅德島州被車撞擊，於 92 歲高齡逝世。

The fatality occurred on Sunday in a supermarket parking lot in East Providence. According to the East Providence Police Department, the subject sustained severe injuries and subsequently expired at Rhode Island Hospital. The driver remained at the scene and cooperated with law enforcement; no charges have been filed as the crash reconstruction team continues its investigation.

該起致命事故發生於週日，地點在東普羅維登斯的一處超市停車場。根據東普羅維登斯警局表示，死者受傷嚴重，隨後在羅德島醫院宣告死亡。駕駛員留在現場並配合執法部門；由於車禍重建小組仍在調查中，目前尚未提起指控。

Wood's academic tenure was characterized by a prolific output of scholarship concerning the American Revolutionary era. His seminal works, including 'The Creation of the American Republic' and 'The Radicalism of the American Revolution,' posited that the transition to independence constituted a profound social and political transformation rather than a mere political shift. This thesis suggested that the U.S. Constitution, while drafted by elites, inadvertently catalyzed the dissolution of the traditional social hierarchies those elites intended to preserve. His contributions were recognized via the Bancroft Prize and the Pulitzer Prize, and in 2011, he was awarded the National Humanities Medal by President Barack Obama.

Wood 的學術生涯以產出大量關於美國革命時代的著作而著稱。他的代表作包括《美國共和國的創建》與《美國革命的激進主義》，主張獨立的轉型構成了一次深刻的社會與政治變革，而非僅僅是政治上的轉移。此論點認為，美國憲法雖由精英起草，卻在無意中催化了這些精英意圖保留的傳統社會階級的瓦解。他的貢獻獲頒班克羅夫特獎與普立茲獎，並於 2011 年獲總統巴拉克·歐巴馬頒發國家人文獎章。

Intellectually, Wood positioned himself between traditional 'great man' narratives and the egalitarian historiography of the 1960s. While he acknowledged the historical omission of women and minority groups, he cautioned against 'presentism'—the application of contemporary moral standards to historical figures. This perspective led to a scholarly divergence with younger academics and a public critique of the 1619 Project. Wood contested the assertion that the preservation of slavery was a primary driver of the Revolution, arguing instead that the founders erroneously believed slavery would naturally dissipate and that the Revolution actually stimulated abolitionist sentiment.

在知識論上，Wood 將自己定位於傳統的「偉人」敘事與 1960 年代的平等主義史學之間。雖然他承認歷史上遺漏了女性與少數群體，但他警告應避免「現時主義」——即將當代的道德標準應用於歷史人物。這一視角導致他與年輕學者產生學術分歧，並對「1619 計劃」提出公開批評。Wood 質疑關於維持奴隸制是革命主因的說法，反而認為開國元勳錯誤地相信奴隸制會自然消失，且革命實際上刺激了廢奴主義情緒。

Beyond his academic publications, Wood's influence extended to public discourse and media. He served as a consultant for Ken Burns' documentaries and chaired an advisory panel for the National Constitution Center. His scholarly theories were referenced in popular culture, specifically within the film 'Good Will Hunting.' Wood's educational background included degrees from Tufts University and Harvard University, and he served in the United States Air Force.

除了學術著作外，Wood 的影響力還延伸至公共論述與媒體。他曾擔任 Ken Burns 紀錄片的顧問，並主持國家憲法中心的顧問小組。他的學術理論被引用於流行文化中，特別是在電影《 ఆది森之夢》(Good Will Hunting) 之中。Wood 的教育背景包括塔夫茨大學與哈佛大學的學位，且曾於美國空軍服役。

Gordon S. Wood's death marks the loss of a central figure in Revolutionary War scholarship whose work redefined the understanding of early American social structures.

Gordon S. Wood 的逝世，標誌著革命戰爭研究領域失去了一位核心人物，其著作重新定義了對早期美國社會結構的理解。