An Air India passenger is currently under review by an internal committee following the damage of an aircraft window pane during a flight from Chandigarh to Delhi on June 7.

一名印度航空乘客在 6 月 7 日從錢德加爾飛往德里的航班上損壞了飛機窗格，目前正由內部委員會進行審查。

The incident occurred during the descent phase of flight AI1879, wherein a passenger from Patna caused the fracture of the inner scratch pane—a non-structural plastic layer designed to protect the primary weight-bearing window components. Despite the issuance of multiple verbal and written admonitions by the cabin crew, the individual remained non-compliant and aggressive. Upon arrival at Indira Gandhi International Airport, the passenger was transferred to security personnel, at which point his demeanor shifted toward repeated apologies.

該事件發生在 AI1879 航班的下降階段，一名來自巴特那的乘客造成內層防刮窗片破裂——這是一個非結構性的塑料層，旨在保護主要承重的窗戶組件。儘管機組人員多次發出口頭與書面警告，該名個體仍不配合且表現激進。抵達英迪拉·甘地國際機場後，該乘客被移交給保安人員，此時其態度轉為不斷道歉。

Procedural adherence is central to the airline's response; the cockpit crew executed standard operating procedures by notifying airport security and the regulatory body. Air India has asserted that the safety of the aircraft and its occupants remained uncompromised throughout the event, citing a zero-tolerance policy regarding security-impacting behavior. Pursuant to the 2017 Civil Aviation Requirements (CAR), the case has been referred to an internal committee. This body is mandated to determine the passenger's classification as 'unruly' and prescribe the duration of any subsequent no-fly restriction within a 30-day window, although a provisional 30-day ban may be implemented pending the final verdict.

程序遵循是航空公司的回應核心；駕駛艙組員執行了標準操作程序，通知了機場保安及監管機構。印度航空堅稱，在整個事件過程中，飛機及其乘客的安全未受影響，並引用針對影響安全行為的零容忍政策。根據 2017 年《民航要求》(CAR)，該案件已提交至內部委員會。該機構受命判定該乘客是否被歸類為「不文明」乘客，並在 30 天期限內規定隨後禁飛限制的持續時間，儘管在最終裁決前可能會實施 30 天的臨時禁飛。

Subsequent to the landing, the individual was detained overnight. On the morning of June 8, the subject attempted to evade police custody at Terminal 3 by fleeing toward the forecourt, necessitating an intervention by the Central Industrial Security Force's Quick Response Team for his reapprehension. During the ensuing inquiry, the passenger's parents alleged a history of mental health instability and requested his repatriation to Patna. Air India denied the request for further transport due to the ongoing administrative proceedings. Following the completion of formal requirements, the individual was released to his guardians.

降落後，該名個體被拘留一夜。6 月 8 日上午，該對象在第三航廈企圖逃避警方拘留，向前廣場逃跑，導致中央工業安全部隊的快速反應小隊必須介入將其重新逮捕。在隨後的詢問中，該乘客的父母聲稱其有精神健康不穩定的病史，並要求將其送回巴特那。由於行政程序仍在進行，印度航空拒絕了進一步運送的請求。在完成正式要求後，該名個體被釋放給其監護人。

The passenger has been released to his parents pending the internal committee's determination regarding his status and potential inclusion on the no-fly list.

該乘客已釋放給其父母，目前正等待內部委員會判定其身分以及是否將其列入禁飛名單。