Current discourse regarding the expansion of artificial intelligence infrastructure in the United States is characterized by a tension between industrial development and local opposition, with emerging allegations of foreign state influence.

目前關於美國人工智慧基礎設施擴展的討論，呈現出工業發展與本地反對勢力之間的緊張關係，且出現了關於外國政府影響的指控。

The proliferation of data centers has encountered significant domestic resistance, as evidenced by Gallup data indicating a 71% opposition rate among the American populace. This sociopolitical climate has prompted high-net-worth investors and government officials, including Interior Secretary Doug Burgum, to hypothesize that such opposition is not entirely organic but is instead augmented by foreign financial contributions. Specifically, figures such as Kevin O'Leary have alleged that Chinese state actors are financing domestic entities—citing the Alliance for a Better Utah and Elevate Strategies—to obstruct projects like the Stratos data center. However, these assertions remain contested; the named organizations have denied such affiliations, and financial audits of the Alliance for a Better Utah indicate revenue streams consistent with historical norms, lacking evidence of external state funding.

數據中心的激增遭遇了顯著的國內阻力，Gallup 的數據顯示美國民眾的反對率高達 71%。這種社會政治氣候促使高淨值投資者與政府官員，包括內政部長 Doug Burgum，假設 such 阻力並非完全自然產生，而是由外國資金支持而加劇。具體而言，如 Kevin O'Leary 等人物指稱中國政府勢力資助國內實體——引用 Alliance for a Better Utah 與 Elevate Strategies 為例——以阻撓如 Stratos 數據中心等項目。然而，這些主張仍存在爭議；被點名的組織否認此類關係，且對 Alliance for a Better Utah 的財務審計顯示，其收入流與歷史常態一致，缺乏外部政府資助的證據。

Parallel to these individual claims, OpenAI has documented a discrete influence operation, termed the 'Data Center Bandwagon' Campaign. The organization identified a cluster of accounts, likely operated by a private Chinese technology firm serving provincial government clients, which utilized ChatGPT to generate content emphasizing the negative externalities of data centers, such as escalating electricity costs. While this represents a verifiable attempt at interference, OpenAI's internal investigations suggest the operation was small-scale and failed to achieve meaningful traction, as it sought to amplify pre-existing domestic grievances rather than initiate new debates. Furthermore, independent academic analysis from Clemson University suggests that Chinese state media prioritizes the promotion of its own domestic capabilities over the active destabilization of U.S. local infrastructure projects, suggesting that the primary drivers of opposition are indigenous concerns.

與這些個人指稱平行，OpenAI 記錄了一次獨立的影響行動， termed 為「數據中心隨大流」運動。該組織識別出一組帳號，可能由一家服務於中國省政府客戶的私人科技公司操作，該公司利用 ChatGPT 生成內容，強調數據中心的負面外部性，例如電費攀升。雖然這代表了一次可驗證的干預嘗試，但 OpenAI 的內部調查顯示，該行動規模較小且未能取得顯著影響，因為其旨在放大既有的國內不滿而非發起新辯論。此外，來自 Clemson 大學的獨立學術分析指出，中國官方媒體優先推廣其國內能力，而非主動破壞美國本地基礎設施項目，這表明反對的主要驅動力為本土憂慮。

While OpenAI has verified a limited Chinese effort to manipulate public sentiment, broader claims of systemic foreign financing of local activists remain unsubstantiated by available evidence.

雖然 OpenAI 已驗證中國曾有一次有限度的嘗試去操縱公眾情緒，但關於外國系統性資助本地活動人士的廣泛指稱，目前仍缺乏證據支持。