A Jakarta military tribunal has issued prison sentences to four members of the Indonesian National Armed Forces (TNI) following their conviction for a chemical assault against activist Andrie Yunus.

雅加達一個軍事法庭在四名印尼國民軍（TNI）成員被裁定對活動人士 Andrie Yunus 進行化學襲擊後，判處其監禁。

The judicial proceedings concluded with the sentencing of four intelligence-affiliated personnel: Sgt. Edi Sudarko, First Lt. Budhi Hariyanto Widhi Cahyono, Capt. Nandala Dwi Prasetya, and Lt. Sami Lakka. Sentences ranged from eighteen months to three years of incarceration. Sudarko and Cahyono were additionally dismissed from military service. The court's determination rested on the defendants' deliberate application of hydrochloric acid to the victim, which resulted in permanent ocular impairment and severe dermal burns. The presiding judge characterized the conduct as a betrayal of professional duty and an expression of institutional arrogance that compromised the TNI's reputation.

司法程序以對四名與情報部門相關的人員判刑而結束：中士 Edi Sudarko、少尉 Budhi Hariyanto Widhi Cahyono、上尉 Nandala Dwi Prasetya 及少尉 Sami Lakka。刑期從十八個月至三年不等。Sudarko 與 Cahyono 另被開除軍籍。法院的判定基於被告蓄意向受害者噴灑鹽酸，導致受害者眼睛永久受損及嚴重皮膚燒傷。主審法官將此行為定性為對專業職責的背叛，以及一種制度性的傲慢，損害了印尼國民軍（TNI）的名譽。

Stakeholder positioning reveals a significant divergence between the military judiciary and civil society. While prosecutors asserted that the assault was an autonomous action motivated by personal animosity toward Yunus's critiques of military influence in governance, the National Commission on Human Rights (Komnas HAM) indicated that the operation was coordinated and likely involved additional perpetrators. Consequently, Amnesty International Indonesia and other advocacy groups have characterized the proceedings as a potential 'show trial,' citing the disparity between the sentences and the maximum seven-year penalty for premeditated assault. These organizations advocate for the identification of higher-level orchestrators and the transfer of such prosecutions to civilian jurisdictions.

利益相關者的立場顯示，軍方司法部門與公民社會之間存在顯著分歧。雖然檢察官主張此次襲擊是基於對 Yunus 批評軍方干預政權而產生的個人私怨，屬於獨立行動，但國家人權委員會（Komnas HAM）指出，此次行動經過協調，且可能涉及其他共犯。因此，國際特赦組織印尼分會及其他倡議團體將此次審理定性為潛在的「形式審判」，理由是判刑結果與預謀襲擊最高七年監禁的法定刑期相差甚遠。這些組織主張應識別出高層策劃者，並將此類起訴移交至民事司法管轄區。

This incident occurs within a broader context of systemic tension regarding security sector reform. Yunus, associated with the Commission for the Disappeared and Victims of Violence (KontraS), had recently opposed legislative revisions intended to expand military roles in civilian administration. The current case is viewed by observers as an extension of a historical pattern of impunity, drawing parallels to the 2004 poisoning of activist Munir Said Thalib. In response to these concerns, the South Jakarta District Court recently mandated that police continue investigations to ensure comprehensive accountability.

此次事件發生在安全部門改革引起的系統性緊張局勢背景下。與失蹤者及暴力受害者委員會（KontraS）相關的 Yunus 最近反對旨在擴大軍方在民政管理中角色的立法修訂。觀察員認為本案是歷史上「免責」模式的延續，與 2004 年活動人士 Munir Said Thalib 被下毒案具有相似性。針對這些憂慮，南雅加達地方法院最近要求警方繼續調查，以確保全面問責。

Four soldiers have been imprisoned for the attack, though civil rights organizations and Komnas HAM continue to seek a more exhaustive investigation into potential institutional complicity.

四名軍人因此次襲擊被判入獄，但民權組織與國家人權委員會（Komnas HAM）繼續要求對潛在的制度共謀進行更徹底的調查。