The European Union has commenced the operational phase of the Common European Asylum System (CEAS), introducing standardized screening and deportation protocols across member states.

歐盟已開始執行共同歐洲庇護制度 (CEAS) 的運作階段，在各成員國引入標準化的篩查與遣返流程。

The CEAS framework mandates preliminary screenings at external borders to expedite the processing of applicants from jurisdictions with low asylum recognition rates, such as Nigeria, Turkey, and Russia. This systemic shift toward accelerated border procedures is complemented by the proposed establishment of offshore processing centers and third-country deportation hubs. Within Germany, Interior Minister Alexander Dobrindt has advocated for the maintenance of border controls to deter irregular migration, despite European Commission recommendations for a gradual phase-out. Furthermore, the German administration is implementing 'return centers' to facilitate the transfer of asylum seekers to the member states of first entry.

CEAS 框架要求在外部邊境進行初步篩查，以便加快處理來自庇護認可率低之司法管轄區（如尼日利亞、土耳其與俄羅斯）的申請人。這種向加速邊境程序轉型的系統性變動，由擬議中的離岸處理中心與第三國遣返樞紐相輔相成。在德國，內政部長 Alexander Dobrindt 主張維持邊境管制以阻絕非法移民，儘管歐盟委員會建議逐步取消。

Parallel to these legislative shifts, the European Commission's home affairs directorate has initiated technical discussions with representatives of the Taliban. While officials characterize these engagements as necessary for aid delivery and the monitoring of women's rights, critics argue that such rapprochement serves to facilitate the forced deportation of rejected asylum seekers to Afghanistan. This strategic pivot is viewed by some observers as a transition from migration management to a policy of 'remigration,' utilizing bureaucratic terminology—such as 'return management' and 'partnerships'—to describe enforcement actions. The European Network Against Racism suggests these policies are predicated on a socio-political construct of 'imagined whiteness' that delineates permissible residency within Europe.

與這些立法轉變平行的是，歐盟委員會的內政總署已開始與塔利班代表進行技術性討論。雖然官員將這些接觸描述為提供援助與監察女性權利之必要，但批評者認為，這種和解是為了方便將被拒絕庇護的申請人強制遣返至阿富汗。一些觀察員將此戰略轉向視為從移民管理向「再移民」政策的過渡，利用「遣返管理」與「夥伴關係」等官僚術語來描述執法行動。歐洲反種族主義網絡指出，這些政策是基於一種「想像中的白人身份」之社會政治建構，用以劃分在歐洲居住的許可權。

The EU has transitioned to a more restrictive asylum regime, though its practical efficacy remains contested by experts and human rights organizations.

歐盟已轉型至較為嚴格的庇護制度，儘管其實際成效仍受專家與人權組織質疑。