European Union member states are currently evaluating potential reforms to the European External Action Service (EEAS) to address perceived institutional inefficiencies.

歐盟成員國目前正在評估歐洲對外行動服務機構 (EEAS) 的潛在改革，以解決被認為的制度低效問題。

The impetus for these deliberations stems from a perceived lack of operational efficacy within the EEAS, an entity established in 2010 to centralize the bloc's diplomatic, intelligence, and aid functions. Certain member states, notably France and Germany, have posited that the current framework is inadequate for navigating contemporary geopolitical volatility, including the conflict in Ukraine and shifting United States foreign policy. Consequently, proposals have emerged to redistribute specific competencies back to national governments and the European Commission. While a comprehensive transfer of functions would necessitate unanimous treaty ratification, an alternative strategy involves the curtailment of the High Representative's autonomy, specifically regarding the administration of over 140 global delegations.

這些研議的推動力源於認為 EEAS 缺乏運作效能。EEAS 成立於 2010 年，旨在將歐盟的外交、情報和援助功能集中化。部分成員國，尤其是法國和德國，認為目前的框架不足以應對當前地緣政治的波動，包括烏克蘭衝突以及美國外交政策的轉向。因此，出現了將特定權限重新分配回國家政府和歐洲委員會的建議。雖然全面的職能轉移需要一致通過條約批准，但另一種策略涉及削減高級代表的自主權，特別是在管理 140 多個全球代表團方面。

This institutional friction is exacerbated by an internal power contest between European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and High Representative Kaja Kallas. Reports indicate that President von der Leyen has successfully asserted control over critical geographic domains and advocated for a direct-reporting intelligence apparatus. Furthermore, the diplomatic alignment of the bloc has been strained by Ms. Kallas's public assertions regarding China and the United States, which some officials contend diverged from established EU consensus. This divergence is exemplified by the contrast between Ms. Kallas's critical rhetoric concerning Chinese economic practices and the strategic industrial engagements conducted by the leaders of France and Germany in Beijing. The overarching objective of these proposed adjustments is to mitigate coordination failures and enhance the coherence of the EU's external posture.

這種制度摩擦因歐洲委員會主席馮德萊恩與高級代表卡拉斯之間的內部權力鬥爭而加劇。報告指出，馮德萊恩主席已成功掌控關鍵的地理領域，並倡導建立一個直接匯報的情報機制。此外，由於卡拉斯女士對中國和美國的公開言論，歐盟的外交一致性受到壓力，部分官員認為這與歐盟既有的共識相悖。例如，卡拉斯女士對中國經濟做法的批評言論，與法國和德國領導人在北京進行的戰略工業接洽形成了對比。這些擬議調整的首要目標是減輕協調失誤，並增強歐盟對外姿態的一致性。

The EU remains engaged in internal assessments and member-state negotiations to determine the viability and scope of these structural reforms.

歐盟目前仍進行內部評估與成員國協商，以確定這些結構改革的可行性與範圍。