Texas Tech University is currently embroiled in a dispute with the Big 12 Conference and the NCAA over the eligibility of quarterback Brendan Sorsby, who was granted a judicial injunction to play despite extensive gambling violations.

德州理工大學目前正與 Big 12 聯盟及 NCAA 針對四分衛 Brendan Sorsby 的參賽資格發生爭議，儘管 Sorsby 有嚴重的賭博違規紀錄，但其獲得了法院的禁制令允許參賽。

The controversy originates from the discovery that Brendan Sorsby engaged in sports wagering over a four-year period, including approximately 40 bets on his own team during his tenure at Indiana University. While the NCAA initially declared Sorsby permanently ineligible, a Texas judge issued a temporary injunction permitting his participation in the 2026 season, subject to a two-game suspension. The NCAA is currently appealing this decision, with a final trial date scheduled for February 8, 2027.

這項爭議源於發現 Brendan Sorsby 在四年的期間參與體育博彩，包括在印第安納大學就讀期間，在其自身球隊身上投注約 40 次。雖然 NCAA 最初宣布 Sorsby 永久喪失參賽資格，但一名德州法官發布了臨時禁制令，允許其參加 2026 年賽季，但須承受兩場停賽。NCAA 目前正就此決定提出上訴，最終審理日期定於 2027 年 2 月 8 日。

Stakeholder positioning remains polarized. Texas Tech administration, including President Lawrence Schovanec and Athletic Director Kirby Hocutt, has maintained a posture of unwavering support for Sorsby. The university characterizes Sorsby's conduct as a manifestation of diagnosed gambling and anxiety disorders. To mitigate future risks, the institution has implemented a compliance framework involving the installation of non-removable monitoring software on Sorsby's electronic devices, the appointment of a financial custodian for his NIL earnings, and mandatory clinical therapy.

利益相關者的立場依然兩極分化。包括校長 Lawrence Schovanec 與體育總監 Kirby Hocutt 在內的德州理工大學管理層，一直對 Sorsby 持堅定支持態度。大學將 Sorsby 的行為定性為診斷出的賭博與焦慮症表現。為了降低未來風險，校方實施了一套合規框架，包括在 Sorsby 的電子設備上安裝不可移除的監控軟體、為其 NIL 收益委任財務監管人，以及強制進行臨床治療。

Conversely, the Big 12 Conference and various external athletic departments have expressed opposition to Sorsby's reinstatement. Several athletic directors have cited the necessity of preserving competitive integrity, with some institutions reportedly suspending future scheduling with Texas Tech. Oklahoma Attorney General Gentner Drummond has formally recommended that the Big 12 invoke Bylaw 3.6 to sanction Texas Tech, asserting that the university's actions are materially adverse to the conference's interests. This recommendation follows a counter-assertion by Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, who suggested that conference sanctions would expose the Big 12 to antitrust liability and breach of contract claims.

相反地，Big 12 聯盟及多個外部體育部門對 Sorsby 恢復資格表示反對。數名體育總監引用了維護競爭公正性的必要性，據報導部分機構已暫停與德州理工大學的未來賽程安排。俄克拉荷馬州總檢察長 Gentner Drummond 已正式建議 Big 12 引用附則 3.6 對德州理工大學進行制裁，主張該大學的行為對聯盟利益造成實質不利影響。此建議是在德州總檢察長 Ken Paxton 的反向主張之後提出的，後者認為聯盟制裁將使 Big 12 面臨反壟斷責任與違約索賠。

Furthermore, the NCAA has identified the proposed 'Protect College Sports Act' as a potential legislative mechanism to override the judicial injunction. The organization has communicated to Division I commissioners that Section 123 of the Act would allow the NCAA to maintain eligibility restrictions regardless of pending state court proceedings, provided the provision remains intact during legislative markup.

此外，NCAA 將擬議中的《保護大學體育法案》（Protect College Sports Act）視為一個可能的立法機制，用以推翻司法禁制令。該組織已告知第一分區（Division I）專員，只要該條文在立法修訂期間保持不變，法案第 123 條將允許 NCAA 維持參賽資格限制，無論州法院的訴訟程序如何進行。

The situation remains unresolved as the Big 12 leadership continues deliberations on potential sanctions and the NCAA pursues a legal appeal of the injunction.

由於 Big 12 領導層仍在研議潛在的制裁，且 NCAA 持續就禁制令提出法律上訴，因此目前情況尚未解決。