The U.S. Attorney's Office in Los Angeles has initiated multiple investigations into alleged election fraud within California, coinciding with broader federal efforts to address systemic financial fraud in the state.

洛杉磯的美國檢察官辦公室已針對加州內涉嫌選舉舞弊的事件展開多次調查，與此同時，聯邦政府亦在全州範圍內採取行動，處理系統性金融詐欺問題。

The current investigative posture of First Assistant U.S. Attorney Bill Essayli is characterized by a public solicitation of evidence regarding primary election irregularities. This approach deviates from the Justice Manual, which prescribes that federal prosecutors refrain from overt investigative measures until election results are certified to avoid the chilling of legitimate voting activities. While Essayli has acknowledged a lack of evidence regarding widespread fraud capable of altering election outcomes, he asserts that the state's electoral vulnerabilities—specifically regarding voter ID policies, mail-in ballot chain of custody, and the accuracy of voter rolls—necessitate a forensic audit. These assertions align with claims made by President Donald Trump and House Speaker Mike Johnson, who have characterized the California electoral process as compromised.

美國首席助理檢察官 Bill Essayli 目前的調查姿態，是以公開徵集關於初選違規的證據為特徵。這種做法與《司法手冊》不符，因為手冊規定聯邦檢察官在選舉結果正式認證前，應避免採取公開調查措施，以免對合法的投票活動產生寒蟬效應。雖然 Essayli 承認缺乏足以改變選舉結果的大規模舞弊證據，但他主張加州的選舉漏洞——特別是關於選民身分證明政策、郵寄選票的保管鏈以及選民名冊的準確性——必須進行法證審計。這些主張與總統川普及眾議院議長 Mike Johnson 的說法一致，後者將加州的選舉過程描述為已被操縱。

Conversely, state officials and election experts maintain that the perceived irregularities are procedural rather than fraudulent. They attribute the delayed tallying of votes to the high volume of mail-in ballots and a commitment to accuracy over speed. Legal scholars, including Justin Levitt, have criticized the public nature of these investigations as an anomaly in federal prosecutorial standards. Furthermore, former prosecutors have suggested that these actions may be politically motivated, citing a broader administrative trend of appointing loyalists to key Justice Department positions to facilitate election skepticism.

相反地，州政府官員與選舉專家則認為，感知到的違規現象是程序性的而非舞弊。他們將投票統計的延遲歸因於郵寄選票數量龐大，以及對準確性而非速度的堅持。包括 Justin Levitt 在內的法律學者批評，此類公開調查在聯邦檢察標準中屬於反常現象。此外，前檢察官指出這些行動可能具有政治動機，並引用一個更廣泛的行政趨勢，即在司法部關鍵職位上任命忠誠者，以促進對選舉的懷疑論。

Parallel to electoral concerns, the federal administration has expanded its focus to financial malfeasance. Essayli has described California as a 'fraudster’s paradise,' citing a $45 million Medicare Botox scam as evidence of systemic failure. This effort is integrated into a wider initiative led by Vice President JD Vance and the Task Force to Eliminate Fraud, which resulted in the deferment of $1.3 billion in federal Medicaid funding to California. The administration posits that state negligence in medical licensing and oversight has enabled extensive fraud, signaling a willingness to prosecute government officials found to be complicit in these schemes.

與選舉疑慮平行，聯邦政府已將焦點擴展至金融不法行為。Essayli 將加州形容為「詐欺者的天堂」，並以一宗 4,500 萬美元的 Medicare Botox 詐騙案作為系統性失效的證據。此舉被整合進由副總統 JD Vance 與「消除詐欺工作小組」領導的更廣泛計畫中，導致加州被遞延 13 億美元的聯邦 Medicaid 資金。政府認為，州政府在醫療執照核發與監督方面的疏忽導致了大規模詐欺，並表明願意起訴被發現參與這些計畫的政府官員。

Federal authorities continue to monitor California's election processes and financial systems, while state officials maintain the integrity of their operations.

聯邦當局將持續監控加州的選舉程序與金融系統，而州政府官員則堅持其運作的誠信。