Rutgers University has canceled a scheduled graduation address by alumnus Rami Elghandour following student objections to his social media commentary regarding Israel and Palestine.

由於學生對校友 Rami Elghandour 在社群媒體上關於以色列與巴勒斯坦的評論表示反對，羅格斯大學已取消其原定的畢業演講。

The administrative decision by Rutgers University to rescind the invitation of Rami Elghandour, CEO of Arcellx, was predicated on reports that a segment of the graduating class would boycott the School of Engineering's May 15 convocation. The university administration asserted that this measure was necessary to maintain the celebratory nature of the event and prevent students from being compelled to choose between their personal convictions and the ceremony. While the institution declined to specify the exact content of the contested posts, it confirmed the subject matter pertained to Israel. Mr. Elghandour, who has produced documentaries concerning Palestinian casualties, has frequently disseminated content alleging Israeli war crimes and the existence of an apartheid system. He characterized the university's action as an erosion of First Amendment protections, noting a contradiction between the institution's previous commendation of his humanitarian leadership and its current censure.

羅格斯大學決定撤回對 Arcellx 執行長 Rami Elghandour 的邀請，是基於有報告指出部分畢業生將抵制 5 月 15 日工程學院的畢業典禮。大學校方主張，此舉對於維持活動的慶祝性質至關重要，可避免學生被迫在個人信念與典禮之間做出選擇。雖然校方拒絕說明爭議帖文的具體內容，但確認主題與以色列有關。Elghandour 先生曾製作關於巴勒斯坦傷亡的紀錄片，並經常發布指控以色列犯下戰爭罪行及存在種族隔離制度的內容。他將大學的行為定義為對憲法第一修正案保障的侵蝕，並指出校方先前稱讚其人道主義領導力與目前的譴責之間存在矛盾。

This incident is situated within a broader systemic trend across United States higher education institutions. The University of Michigan recently experienced a similar conflict after Professor Derek Peterson commended pro-Palestinian activists during a commencement speech. This occurrence prompted an official apology from the university president following threats from Republican legislators and donors to terminate institutional funding, citing the creation of a hostile environment for Jewish students. Consequently, this has led to a divergence in stakeholder positioning, with academic freedom organizations and faculty members condemning the administration's apology as a compromise of intellectual liberty. Furthermore, other institutions, including New York University and the City University of New York, have implemented restrictive measures such as banning live speeches or requiring pre-recorded addresses to mitigate potential disruptions.

此事件處於美國高等教育機構更廣泛的系統性趨勢之中。密西根大學最近在 Derek Peterson 教授於畢業演講中讚揚支持巴勒斯坦的活動人士後，也經歷了類似的衝突。由於共和黨議員與捐助者威脅將終止撥款，理由是這為猶太學生創造了敵對環境，導致大學校長隨後發表正式道歉。因此，這導致利益相關者的立場分歧，學術自由組織與教職員譴責校方的道歉是對知識自由的妥協。此外，包括紐約大學與紐約市立大學在內的其他機構，已實施限制措施，例如禁止現場演講或要求預錄演講，以減輕潛在的混亂。

The current landscape of university commencements is characterized by an increasing tension between the preservation of institutional neutrality and the exercise of political expression.

當前大學畢業典禮的景象，其特徵在於維護機構中立與行使政治表達之間的緊張關係日益增加。