Cornell University has commenced a formal inquiry following reports that a student declined a professional internship based on the religious identity of the employer.

康乃爾大學在收到報告指一名學生因僱主的宗教身份而拒絕一份專業實習後，已啟動正式調查。

The incident originated via Handshake, a professional recruitment platform, where Austin Franco, a Cornell University student, applied for a summer position at VryfID, a New York-based identity verification startup. Following outreach from co-founders Gabe and Aiden Einhorn, Franco reportedly transmitted a communication stating a lack of interest in employment under Jewish leadership. This exchange was subsequently disseminated on the social media platform X by Gabe Einhorn to illustrate the persistence of antisemitism.

事件起源於專業招聘平台 Handshake，康乃爾大學學生 Austin Franco 申請了位於紐約的身份驗證初創公司 VryfID 的夏季職位。在共同創辦人 Gabe 與 Aiden Einhorn 聯繫後，據報導 Franco 發送了一則訊息，表示不願在猶太領導層下工作。Gabe Einhorn 隨後在社交平台 X 上公開此對話，以說明反猶太主義的持續存在。

Subsequent to the public disclosure, Franco asserted that his decision was predicated on a cumulative negative perception of the Jewish community derived from both interpersonal and digital interactions. He further hypothesized that the public reaction would have been less severe had the discrimination been directed toward white or Christian individuals. Concurrently, the discourse expanded to include external stakeholders; notably, Palantir co-founder Joe Lonsdale advocated for the public identification of the student to ensure accountability, a suggestion that preceded the disclosure of Franco's identity by Einhorn.

在公開披露後，Franco 主張其決定是基於其在人際與數位互動中對猶太社區累積的負面感知。他進一步假設，若歧視對象是白人或基督徒，公眾反應可能不會如此劇烈。與此同時，討論範圍擴展至外部利害關係人； notably，Palantir 共同創辦人 Joe Lonsdale 主張公開該學生的身份以確保問責，而 Einhorn 隨後披露了 Franco 的身份。

Institutional response has been characterized by a formal condemnation of discriminatory behavior. The university's Office of Civil Rights has assumed jurisdiction over the matter to determine if university policy was violated. Franco has since indicated a withdrawal from scheduled public discussions, citing the necessity of awaiting the university's administrative determination regarding his future enrollment status.

校方的回應是以正式譴責歧視行為。大學的民權辦公室已接手此案，以判定是否違反大學政策。Franco 隨後表示將退出預定的公開討論，理由是需等待大學行政部門對其未來就讀狀態的判定。

The matter remains under internal review by Cornell University as the student awaits a decision regarding his academic standing.

康乃爾大學目前仍對此案進行內部審查，該學生正等待關於其學業地位的決定。