Members of the House of Representatives have introduced several resolutions seeking the impeachment of federal judges, citing both judicial misconduct and disagreements over legal rulings.

眾議院議員提出了數項決議案，尋求彈劾聯邦法官，理由包括司法不當行為以及對法律裁決的分歧。

The current legislative efforts target multiple Obama-era appointees. Representative Greg Steube initiated proceedings against Judge John McConnell Jr. following the vacation of a Trump administration immigration policy. The resolution asserts that Judge McConnell prioritized noncitizen interests over national security. Similarly, Judge James Boasberg has faced resolutions related to the temporary obstruction of deportation flights under the Alien Enemies Act. These actions align with a broader institutional trend, as the Department of Justice has reportedly solicited evidence of judicial activism to inform potential impeachment referrals, with Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche characterizing the relationship between the executive and judicial branches as a conflict.

目前的立法努力針對多名歐巴馬時期的任命者。眾議員 Greg Steube 在川普政府的移民政策被撤銷後，啟動了對法官 John McConnell Jr. 的程序。該決議案聲稱，McConnell 法官將非公民的利益置於國家安全之上。同樣地，James Boasberg 法官也面臨與《外籍敵國法》下暫時阻礙遣返航班相關的決議案。這些行動符合一個更廣泛的體制趨勢，據報導司法部已在徵集司法激進主義的證據，以供潛在的彈劾轉介參考，副司法部長 Todd Blanche 將行政部門與司法部門之間的關係形容為一種衝突。

Concurrent with policy-based challenges, Representative Clay Fuller and Representative Andrew Clyde have introduced resolutions against Judge Eleanor Ross. These filings follow an investigation by the Judicial Council of the Eleventh Circuit, which concluded that Judge Ross engaged in a sexual relationship with a police official within her chambers during business hours and attended a partisan political event. The investigation further determined that Judge Ross provided false testimony to Chief Judge William Pryor before eventually recanting. While the Judicial Council issued a private reprimand and restricted her administrative roles, the House resolutions allege a fundamental breach of judicial ethics. Judge Ross has since issued apologies to former staff for her conduct and for previous false accusations made against a clerk.

與基於政策的挑戰同時進行的是，眾議員 Clay Fuller 和 Andrew Clyde 提出了針對 Eleanor Ross 法官的決議案。這些申請是在第 11 巡迴法院司法委員會的調查之後提出的，該調查結論認為 Ross 法官在辦公時間內，在自己的辦公室與一名警察官員發生性關係，並參加了一個黨派政治活動。調查進一步確定，Ross 法官在最終撤回之前，向首席法官 William Pryor 提供虛假證詞。雖然司法委員會發出了私人譴責並限制了她的行政職責，但眾議院的決議案指控其嚴重違反司法倫理。Ross 法官隨後已就其行為以及先前對一名書記的虛假指控向前員工道歉。

Historically, the removal of federal judges is a rare occurrence, with only eight convictions in U.S. history, typically predicated on criminal misconduct rather than legal interpretation. Chief Justice John Roberts has formally stated that the appellate process, rather than impeachment, is the appropriate mechanism for addressing judicial disagreements. Despite this precedent, current House leadership has indicated that 'egregious abuses' may justify such measures. Conversely, Democratic Representative Steve Cohen has introduced articles of impeachment against Chief Justice Roberts, alleging ethical conflicts and partisan bias in redistricting cases.

從歷史上看，撤換聯邦法官是罕見的，美國歷史上僅有八次定罪，通常是以刑事不當行為而非法律解釋為前提。首席大法官 John Roberts 正式表示，處理司法分歧的適當機制是上訴程序，而非彈劾。儘管有此先例，目前的眾議院領導層表示，「極其嚴重的濫權」可能證明此類措施是合理的。相反，民主黨眾議員 Steve Cohen 則對 Roberts 首席大法官提出了彈劾條款，指控其在重新劃分選區的案件中存在倫理衝突與黨派偏見。

The referred resolutions currently await a determination by the House Judiciary Committee regarding the commencement of formal proceedings.

上述決議案目前正等待眾議院司法委員會決定是否啟動正式程序。