A former employee of JPMorgan Chase, Chirayu Rana, has initiated legal proceedings against a former superior, Lorna Hajdini, alleging a pattern of sexual harassment, racial abuse, and professional coercion.

摩根大通前員工 Chirayu Rana 已對其前上司 Lorna Hajdini 提起法律訴訟，指控其存在性騷擾、種族虐待及職場強迫的行為模式。

The litigation centers on claims that Ms. Hajdini, an executive director within the Leveraged Finance division, utilized her seniority to compel Mr. Rana into non-consensual sexual acts and subjected him to racial derogation. Mr. Rana asserts that these actions commenced shortly after his appointment in early 2024 and included the administration of pharmacological agents to facilitate assault. Furthermore, the plaintiff alleges that the institution facilitated this environment and engaged in retaliatory measures following his internal reports of misconduct.

此訴訟的核心在於指控 Hajdini 女士（槓桿金融部門執行董事）利用其職級，強迫 Rana 先生進行非自願的性行為，並對其進行種族貶低。Rana 先生主張這些行為在他 2024 年初就任後不久便開始，且包括使用藥物以方便實施襲擊。此外，原告指控該機構縱容了這種環境，並在其內部舉報違規行為後採取報復措施。

Conversely, the defense maintains a position of total denial. Ms. Hajdini and her legal representatives characterize the allegations as fabrications. JPMorgan Chase asserts that a comprehensive internal inquiry, involving the review of electronic communications and witness testimony, yielded no evidence of wrongdoing. The institution further notes that while Ms. Hajdini cooperated fully, Mr. Rana declined to participate in the internal investigation. Additionally, the bank's position is bolstered by claims that the reporting structure precluded Ms. Hajdini from exercising direct authority over Mr. Rana's compensation or promotion.

相反地，辯方採取完全否認的立場。Hajdini 女士及其法律代表將這些指控描述為捏造。摩根大通聲稱，經過包括審查電子通訊和證人證詞在內的全面內部調查，未發現任何違規證據。該機構進一步指出，Hajdini 女士全力配合，而 Rana 先生則拒絕參與內部調查。此外，銀行方面還聲稱，根據匯報結構，Hajdini 女士無法對 Rana 先生的薪酬或晉升行使直接權限。

Financial negotiations preceding the public filing indicate a significant divergence in valuation. Reports suggest that Mr. Rana initially sought a sum exceeding $20 million, later proposing a counteroffer of $11.75 million. JPMorgan Chase offered a settlement of $1 million, which was rejected. The bank characterized this offer as an attempt to mitigate the reputational harm and litigation expenses associated with the dispute. Concurrent with these legal developments, questions have been raised regarding Mr. Rana's credibility, specifically concerning a reported instance of bereavement leave obtained under the false premise of his father's decease.

在公開起訴前的財務協商顯示，雙方對估值存在顯著分歧。報導指出，Rana 先生最初尋求超過 2,000 萬美元的金額，隨後提出 1,175 萬美元的反要約。摩根大通提供 100 萬美元的和解金，但被拒絕。銀行將此提議定義為試圖減輕與該爭議相關的名譽損害及訴訟費用。與這些法律進展同時，Rana 先生的可信度受到質疑，特別是關於其被報導以父親去世為假由申請喪假的案例。

The matter remains unresolved as the parties proceed toward discovery and deposition, with the plaintiff citing a PTSD diagnosis and witness statements to support his claims.

由於雙方正進入證據開示與錄口供階段，此案仍未解決，原告引用 PTSD 診斷及證人陳述以支持其主張。