Many people died in fires in India. Electronic door locks made it hard for people to leave the buildings.

許多人在印度的火災中喪生。電子門鎖使得人們難以離開建築物。

Many homes and shops now use electronic locks. In cities like Delhi and Lucknow, these locks stopped working during fires. The locks stayed closed and trapped people inside. In one fire, firefighters had to break a wall to save people because the door would not open.

許多家庭和商店現在使用電子鎖。在德里和勒克瑙等城市，這些鎖在火災期間停止運作。鎖頭保持關閉狀態並將人們困在裡面。在一次火災中，消防員不得不打破牆壁才能救人，因為門無法打開。

These locks are dangerous because they do not open when the power goes out. Some companies buy cheap locks to save money. These cheap locks do not have a simple handle or a key for emergencies. Also, high heat can break the electronic parts of the lock.

這些鎖很危險，因為斷電時它們不會開啟。有些公司為了省錢而購買廉價鎖。這些廉價鎖沒有簡單的手把或緊急用鑰匙。此外，高溫可能會損壞門鎖的電子元件。

Experts say buildings need better locks. Every door needs a manual lock or a real key. This helps people open the door quickly when there is a fire.

專家表示建築物需要更好的鎖。每道門都需要一個手動鎖或實體鑰匙。這有助於人們在發生火災時迅速開門。

Safety is more important than easy locks. All buildings must have doors that people can open by hand.

安全比便利的門鎖更重要。所有建築物的門必須是可以手動開啟的。

Recent fatal fires in India have shown a dangerous link between the use of automatic electronic door locks and the failure of emergency evacuation plans.

最近印度發生的幾次致命火災顯示，自動電子門鎖的使用與緊急疏散計劃失效之間存在危險的聯繫。

The increasing use of biometric and sensor-based locks in homes and businesses has created serious safety risks. Evidence from recent fires in Lucknow, Delhi, and Indore shows that electronic locks often fail during fires, trapping people inside buildings. For example, during an incident in Aliganj, witnesses stated that a biometric scanner locked automatically, blocking the main exit. Because there were no other ways out and the main door would not open, the Lucknow Fire Department had to break through a neighboring wall to rescue those inside.

在住宅和商業環境中，生物辨識和感測鎖的使用日益增加，這造成了嚴重的安全風險。來自勒克瑙、德里和印多爾近期火災的證據顯示，電子鎖在火災期間經常失效，將人困在建築物內。例如，在 Aliganj 發生的一起事故中，目擊者表示生物辨識掃描器自動鎖死，阻塞了主要出口。由於沒有其他出路且主門無法開啟，勒克瑙消防局不得不破壞鄰近牆壁才能救出內部人員。

From a technical point of view, the main problem is the lack of 'fail-safe' systems, which are designed to unlock automatically if the power fails. Experts from the Delhi Fire Service and EHS Circle India emphasized that companies often choose cheaper locks over safer ones, resulting in systems that lack manual overrides. Furthermore, extreme heat can damage electronic parts or warp door frames, making the locks impossible to open. Consequently, experts assert that buildings must include backup methods, such as physical keys or manual turns, to reduce these risks.

從技術角度來看，主要問題在於缺乏「故障安全」系統，此類系統旨在斷電時自動解鎖。德里消防局和 EHS Circle India 的專家強調，公司經常選擇較便宜的鎖而非較安全的鎖，導致系統缺乏手動覆蓋功能。此外，極端高溫可能會損壞電子零件或使門框變形，導致鎖具無法開啟。因此，專家主張建築物必須包含備用方法，例如實體鑰匙或手動旋鈕，以降低這些風險。

This situation highlights the urgent need to move away from locks that only offer convenience and instead prioritize safety features and better evacuation planning.

這種情況凸顯了我們迫切需要放棄僅提供便利的鎖具，而應優先考慮安全功能和更好的疏散計劃。

Recent fire fatalities in India have highlighted a critical correlation between the deployment of automated electronic door locks and the failure of emergency evacuation procedures.

印度近期發生的火災死亡事件凸顯了自動電子門鎖的部署與緊急疏散程序失敗之間存在關鍵相關性。

The proliferation of biometric and sensor-based access control systems in residential and commercial sectors has introduced significant systemic vulnerabilities. Evidence from recent conflagrations in Lucknow, Delhi, and Indore indicates that electronic locking mechanisms frequently malfunction during thermal events, effectively sealing occupants within structures. In the Aliganj incident, witness testimony suggests that a biometric scanner automatically engaged, thereby obstructing the primary exit. This necessitated a tactical breach of an adjacent residential wall by the Lucknow Fire Department, as the absence of secondary egress routes and the failure of the primary portal rendered standard entry impossible.

住宅與商業領域中生物識別及感測門禁系統的普及，引入了顯著的系統性漏洞。從勒克瑙、德里和印多爾近期發生的火災證據顯示，電子鎖機制在熱事件中經常失效，有效地將佔用者封鎖在建築物內。在 Aliganj 事件中，目擊者證詞指出生物識別掃描器自動啟動，從而堵塞了主要出口。由於缺乏次要逃生路線且主要門戶失效，導致標準進入方式不可行，勒克瑙消防局因此必須對相鄰住宅牆壁採取戰術突破。

From a technical perspective, the absence of 'fail-safe' architectures—systems designed to revert to an open state upon power loss or component failure—is a primary catalyst for these outcomes. Industry experts from the Delhi Fire Service and EHS Circle India posit that the prioritization of cost-efficiency over safety specifications often results in the installation of locks lacking manual overrides. Furthermore, the susceptibility of electronic components to extreme heat and the potential for structural warping of door frames can render even functioning locks inoperable. Consequently, the integration of redundant access methods, such as mechanical thumb-turns, physical key overrides, and external power terminals, is identified as a necessary prerequisite for mitigating these risks.

從技術角度來看，缺乏「失效安全」（fail-safe）架構——即設計在電源喪失或組件失效時恢復為開啟狀態的系統——是導致這些結果的主要催化劑。德里消防局和 EHS Circle India 的業界專家認為，將成本效益優先於安全規範，往往導致安裝缺乏手動覆蓋功能的鎖具。此外，電子元件對極端高溫的敏感性以及門框發生結構形變的可能性，可能導致即使功能正常的鎖也無法操作。因此，整合冗餘訪問方法（如機械式旋鈕、實體鑰匙覆蓋和外部電源端子）被確定為緩解這些風險的必要前提。

The current situation underscores a critical need for the transition from convenience-centric locking systems to those prioritizing fail-safe manual overrides and comprehensive evacuation planning.

目前的狀況強調了從以便利為中心的鎖定系統，轉向優先考慮失效安全手動覆蓋及全面疏散規劃的緊迫需求。