Two singers, Sunitha Upadrasta and Chinmayi Sripaada, are arguing. They disagree about feminism and women's rights.

兩位歌手 Sunitha Upadrasta 與 Chinmayi Sripaada 正在爭論，她們對女性主義與女性權利的看法分歧。

Sunitha said that feminism is not about clothes or smoking. She thinks women should follow old rules to stay safe. She believes men's opinions are hard to change.

Sunitha 表示女性主義並非關乎穿著或吸菸。她認為女性應該遵循傳統規則以確保安全。她相信男性的觀念很難改變。

Chinmayi did not like this. She says women must have the right to control their own bodies. She says Sunitha's ideas are dangerous and can lead to violence against women.

Chinmayi 並不認同此觀點。她表示女性必須擁有掌控自己身體的權利。她認為 Sunitha 的想法很危險，可能會導致對女性的暴力。

Later, Sunitha wrote a message on Instagram. She said she was angry at bad men. She says she does not like violence and she respects Chinmayi.

隨後，Sunitha 在 Instagram 上發表了一則訊息。她表示自己對某些惡劣的男性感到憤怒。她稱自己並不認同暴力，且她尊重 Chinmayi。

People still disagree about old traditions and new rights for women.

人們對於傳統習俗與女性新權利的爭論依然存在。

A public disagreement has started between singers Sunitha Upadrasta and Chinmayi Sripaada after Upadrasta made comments about the goals of feminism and the right to control one's own body.

在 Upadrasta 對女權目標及掌控自身身體的權利發表評論後，歌手 Sunitha Upadrasta 與 Chinmayi Sripaada 之間展開了一場公開爭論。

The conflict began after an interview where Sunitha Upadrasta argued that modern feminism has wrongly focused too much on personal choices, such as what women wear or whether they smoke. She emphasized that true equality means valuing a woman's opinions rather than just having external freedoms. Regarding the phrase 'my body, my right,' Upadrasta suggested that it is more practical for women to follow cultural traditions for their own safety instead of trying to change how men perceive them.

這場衝突始於一次訪談，當時 Sunitha Upadrasta 主張現代女權主義錯誤地過度關注於個人選擇，例如女性穿著什麼或是否吸菸。她強調真正的平等意味著重視女性的意見，而非僅僅擁有外部自由。關於「我的身體，我的權利」這句話，Upadrasta 建議女性為了自身安全，遵循文化傳統會更實際，而不是嘗試改變男性對她們的看法。

These views were strongly criticized by social media users and singer Chinmayi Sripaada. Sripaada asserted that Upadrasta's logic actually helps keep women oppressed and ignores the real purpose of bodily autonomy, which includes reproductive rights and protection from violence. To show the danger of this thinking, Sripaada mentioned cases of extreme violence and reported a user who used similar logic to threaten a woman, calling for police action.

這些觀點遭到社交媒體用戶及歌手 Chinmayi Sripaada 的強烈批評。Sripaada 主張 Upadrasta 的邏輯實際上是在助長對女性的壓迫，並無視了身體自主權的真正目的，包括生育權及免受暴力的保護。為了揭示這種思維的危險性，Sripaada 提到了極端暴力的案例，並舉報了一名使用類似邏輯威脅女性的用戶，呼籲警方採取行動。

Later, Upadrasta used Instagram to clarify her position and try to resolve the tension. She explained that her comments came from frustration with the behavior of disrespectful men and were not meant to make exploitation seem normal. Furthermore, she stated that she respects Sripaada's activism and strongly opposes any physical attacks or violations of women's rights.

隨後，Upadrasta 利用 Instagram 澄清其立場並嘗試緩解緊張局勢。她解釋說，她的評論源於對不尊重女性的男性行為感到沮喪，而非旨在使剝削合理化。此外，她表示尊重 Sripaada 的社會活動，並強烈反對任何身體攻擊或侵犯女性權利的行為。

The situation continues to highlight the tension between following cultural traditions and fighting for the modern concept of feminist autonomy.

目前的局面持續凸顯了遵循文化傳統與爭取現代女權自主概念之間的緊張關係。

A public dispute has emerged between singer Sunitha Upadrasta and singer Chinmayi Sripaada following comments made by Upadrasta regarding the nature of feminist struggle and bodily autonomy.

在 Upadrasta 就女性主義鬥爭性質與身體自主權發表言論後，歌手 Sunitha Upadrasta 與歌手 Chinmayi Sripaada 之間爆發了一場公開爭論。

The controversy commenced following an interview with Gulte, wherein Sunitha Upadrasta posited that contemporary interpretations of feminism have been erroneously reduced to behavioral choices, such as smoking or attire. Upadrasta asserted that true equality resides in the valuation of a woman's opinions rather than in external liberties. Specifically, in response to the slogan 'my body, my right,' Upadrasta suggested that if such a premise is accepted, a corresponding 'his eyes, his right' logic applies, arguing that it is more pragmatic for women to adhere to cultural norms for safety than to attempt to alter male perception.

這場爭議始於一次與 Gulte 的訪談，Sunitha Upadrasta 在訪談中認為，現代對女性主義的詮釋被錯誤地簡化為行為選擇，例如抽菸或穿著。Upadrasta 主張真正的平等在於重視女性的觀點，而非外部的自由。特別是在回應「我的身體，我的權利」這句口號時，Upadrasta 建議如果接受此前提，則會適用對應的「他的眼睛，他的權利」邏輯，認為女性為了安全而遵守文化規範，比嘗試改變男性的看法更為務實。

This perspective elicited significant criticism from social media users and singer Chinmayi Sripaada. Sripaada contended that Upadrasta's rhetoric facilitates the subjugation of women and undermines the fundamental objective of bodily autonomy, which encompasses reproductive rights and protection from systemic violence. To illustrate the potential danger of Upadrasta's logic, Sripaada highlighted instances of extreme violence and reported a social media user who utilized a similar linguistic structure to threaten a woman with acid, thereby requesting police intervention.

這一觀點引起了社交媒體用戶與歌手 Chinmayi Sripaada 的強烈批評。Sripaada 主張 Upadrasta 的言論助長了對女性的壓制，並削弱了身體自主權這一基本目標，而身體自主權涵蓋了生育權及免受系統性暴力的保護。為了說明 Upadrasta 邏輯中潛在的危險，Sripaada 舉出極端暴力的實例，並舉報了一名使用類似語言結構以硫酸恐嚇女性的社交媒體用戶，請求警方介入。

In subsequent communications via Instagram, Upadrasta attempted a rapprochement by clarifying her position. She stated that her initial remarks were born of frustration regarding the behavior of 'lecherous men' and were not intended to normalize exploitation. While she maintained her respect for Sripaada's activism, Upadrasta clarified that she does not condone physical aggression or the violation of women's autonomy, asserting that she would personally oppose any physical assault against women.

在隨後透過 Instagram 的溝通中，Upadrasta 嘗試澄清立場以達成和解。她表示，最初的言論是出於對「好色男人」行為的挫折感，而非意圖將剝削正常化。雖然她維持對 Sripaada 社會行動主義的尊重，但 Upadrasta 澄清她並不認同肢體攻擊或侵犯女性自主權，並強調她個人會反對任何對女性的肢體暴力。

The situation remains a point of contention regarding the intersection of cultural tradition and the conceptual framework of feminist autonomy.

目前的局面仍是一個爭論焦點，涉及文化傳統與女性主義自主概念框架之間的交集。