A group of people started a legal case against Fortescue Metals Group (FMG). They say the company had many problems with violence and harassment at work.

一群人對 Fortescue Metals Group (FMG) 提起法律訴訟。他們聲稱該公司在職場暴力與騷擾方面存在許多問題。

Women at FMG work sites say men hurt them between 2006 and 2025. Some men stole clothes or entered private rooms. Other men attacked women. Women who told the company about these problems lost their jobs.

FMG 工作地點的女性表示，在 2006 年至 2025 年間，她們遭到男性傷害。部分男性偷走衣物或進入私人房間。其他男性則攻擊女性。而向公司舉報這些問題的女性，反而失去了工作。

Other big mining companies had the same problems. FMG spent 300 million dollars on cameras and locks. But the women say the company is still not safe.

其他大型礦業公司也面臨同樣的問題。FMG 在攝影機和門鎖上花費了 3 億美元。但女性們表示，公司依然不安全。

Some workers say the company only likes men. They say the company talks about safety but does not do it. The court will decide if FMG broke the law.

部分員工稱公司只偏袒男性。他們表示公司雖然口頭強調安全，但實際上並未執行。法院將決定 FMG 是否違法。

The court case is just starting. FMG will not talk about the details now.

訴訟才剛開始。FMG 目前不會透露詳細內容。

A class action lawsuit has been started in the Federal Court of Australia against Fortescue Metals Group (FMG). The lawsuit claims that there was widespread sexual harassment and violence at the company's remote work sites.

澳洲聯邦法院已受理一項針對 Fortescue Metals Group (FMG) 的集體訴訟。該訴訟指稱該公司在偏遠工作地點存在普遍的性騷擾與暴力行為。

The legal action, led by JGA Saddler and Aristata Capital, claims that female employees at FMG's Pilbara sites experienced various types of misconduct between 2006 and 2025. These allegations include serious crimes such as sexual assault and stalking, as well as general gender-based hostility. For example, some claims mention the theft of clothing from shared laundries and men entering private rooms without permission. Furthermore, the plaintiffs emphasize that employees who reported this behavior were often punished, forced to quit, or fired from their jobs.

這次法律行動由 JGA Saddler 和 Aristata Capital 領頭，指稱 FMG 在 Pilbara 礦區的女性員工在 2006 年至 2025 年間經歷了各類不端行為。這些指控包括性侵害與跟蹤等嚴重罪行，以及一般的性別敵對行為。例如，部分指控提到在共用洗衣房中衣物被盜，以及男性在未經許可的情況下進入私人房間。此外，原告強調，舉報此類行為的員工經常遭到懲罰、被強迫離職或被解僱。

This case follows a trend in the mining industry, as FMG is the third large company targeted by JGA Saddler after BHP and Rio Tinto. Previous government reports have already highlighted systemic harassment in 'fly-in, fly-out' (FIFO) work environments. Although FMG spent $300 million on security, such as CCTV and better locks, the lawyers for the victims argue that these changes did not fix the company's toxic culture. Consequently, the case aims to prove that FMG broke the Sex Discrimination Act by allowing a dangerous environment to exist. While the company claims to be inclusive, the Western Mine Workers Alliance suggests that the remote sites still operate as a 'boys' club' that discourages honesty.

此案件符合礦業的趨勢，因為 FMG 是繼 BHP 和 Rio Tinto 之後，第三家被 JGA Saddler 針對的大型公司。之前的政府報告已指出，「飛進飛出」(FIFO) 的工作環境中存在系統性騷擾。儘管 FMG 在安保方面投入了 3 億美元（如安裝 CCTV 和更換更安全的門鎖），但受害者的律師認為，這些改變並未能解決公司有毒的文化。因此，本案旨在證明 FMG 因允許危險環境存在而違反了《性別歧視法》。雖然公司聲稱採取包容政策，但西方礦工聯盟 (Western Mine Workers Alliance) 指出，偏遠礦區在運作上仍像是一個排斥誠實發言的「男性俱樂部」。

The legal process is still in the early stages, and Fortescue has declined to comment on the specific claims until they have completed a formal review.

法律程序目前仍處於早期階段，Fortescue 在完成正式審查前，拒絕就具體指控發表評論。

A class action lawsuit has been initiated in the Federal Court of Australia against Fortescue Metals Group (FMG), alleging widespread sexual harassment and violence at remote operational sites.

澳洲聯邦法院已啟動一項針對 Fortescue Metals Group (FMG) 的集體訴訟，指稱其偏遠營運據點存在普遍的性騷擾與暴力行為。

The litigation, filed by JGA Saddler and supported by Aristata Capital, asserts that female employees at FMG's Pilbara installations were subjected to a spectrum of misconduct between 2006 and 2025. The allegations encompass severe criminal acts, including rape, stalking, and sexual assault, alongside pervasive micro-aggressions and gender-based hostility. Specific claims cite the theft of female undergarments from communal laundries, the spiking of beverages with hand sanitizer, and the presence of unauthorized males within private accommodations. Furthermore, the plaintiffs allege a culture of professional retaliation, wherein employees who reported such behavior were purportedly marginalized, coerced into resignation, or dismissed.

這起由 JGA Saddler 發起並由 Aristata Capital 支持的訴訟主張，在 2006 年至 2025 年間，FMG 位於 Pilbara 設施的女性員工遭受了各種不當對待。指控內容涵蓋嚴重的刑事犯罪，包括強姦、跟蹤及性侵犯，以及普遍存在的微侵略與基於性別的敵意。具體指稱包括從公共洗衣房盜取女性內衣、在飲料中加入手部消毒劑，以及未經授權的男性進入私人住宿區。此外，原告指稱公司存在職場報復文化，據稱舉報此類行為的員工會被邊緣化、被強迫辭職或被解僱。

This legal action follows a broader industry trend, as FMG is the third major mining entity targeted by JGA Saddler, following similar proceedings against BHP and Rio Tinto. Historical antecedents include a 2022 Western Australian government report and a Rio Tinto independent review, both of which identified systemic harassment within fly-in, fly-out (FIFO) environments. FMG previously entered a $1.4 million agreement to address workplace behavior after allegations surfaced regarding the withholding of harassment documentation from regulators. Despite the implementation of WorkSafe WA mandated training and a reported $300 million investment in site security—including CCTV and enhanced locking mechanisms—legal representatives for the plaintiffs contend that these measures have failed to effect a fundamental cultural shift.

此次法律行動延續了更廣泛的行業趨勢，FMG 是繼 BHP 和 Rio Tinto 之後，第三家被 JGA Saddler 針對的大型礦業實體。歷史前例包括 2022 年西澳洲政府的報告以及 Rio Tinto 的獨立審查，兩者均指出在「飛入飛出」(FIFO) 工作環境中存在系統性騷擾。FMG 先前曾就改善職場行為達成 140 萬美元的協議，此前有指稱其向監管機構隱瞞騷擾文件。儘管實施了 WorkSafe WA 強制要求的培訓，並據報投入 3 億美元用於場地安全（包括 CCTV 和強化的鎖定機制），但原告法律代表認為，這些措施未能促成根本性的文化轉變。

From a regulatory perspective, the case seeks to determine if FMG breached the Sex Discrimination Act by permitting an environment conducive to harassment. While the company maintains a public commitment to an inclusive workplace, the Western Mine Workers Alliance suggests that a discrepancy exists between corporate rhetoric and the lived experience of the workforce, characterizing the remote site culture as an exclusionary 'boys' club' that discourages transparency.

從監管角度來看，本案旨在確定 FMG 是否因容許一個易於產生騷擾的環境而違反了《性別歧視法》。儘管該公司對外承諾建立包容性職場，但西澳礦工聯盟 (Western Mine Workers Alliance) 指出，公司論調與員工的實際經歷之間存在差距，將偏遠據點的文化描述為一個排外的「男子俱樂部」(boys' club)，阻礙透明度。

The proceedings remain in the preliminary stages, with Fortescue declining to comment on specific allegations pending a formal review of the claims.

法律程序目前仍處於初步階段，Fortescue 在正式審查指控前，拒絕就具體指控發表評論。