Lawyers Stop Case Against Harvey Weinstein
Lawyers Stop Case Against Harvey Weinstein
律師停止對 Harvey Weinstein 的起訴
Introduction
Lawyers in New York stopped one rape case against Harvey Weinstein. The woman in the case does not want to go to court again.
紐約的律師停止了一起針對 Harvey Weinstein 的強姦案。案中的女性不想再次出庭。
Main Body
Jessica Mann said Mr. Weinstein hurt her in a hotel in 2013. There were three trials for this. The judges and juries did not agree, so there was no winner.
Jessica Mann 表示 Mr. Weinstein 在 2013 年於一家酒店傷害了她。這件事經過了三次審判。由於法官與陪審團未能達成一致,因此沒有結果。
Alvin Bragg is the lead lawyer. He says Ms. Mann is telling the truth. But he says the trials were too long and too hard for her.
Alvin Bragg 是主導律師。他表示 Ms. Mann 說的是實話。但他認為審判過程太長,對她而言太過艱辛。
Mr. Weinstein's lawyers say he did nothing wrong. They say the trials show he is not guilty. However, Mr. Weinstein is still in prison for other crimes.
Mr. Weinstein 的律師則稱他沒有做錯任何事。他們表示審判結果證明他無罪。然而,Mr. Weinstein 仍因其他罪行而被監禁。
Conclusion
Harvey Weinstein stays in prison because of other cases.
Harvey Weinstein 因其他案件而繼續被監禁。
Vocabulary Learning
🕰️ Then vs. Now
Look at how we talk about things that finished (Past) and things that are true now (Present).
The Past (Finished)
- hurt (happened in 2013)
- were (the trials are over)
- did not agree (the judges finished their work)
The Present (Now)
- is (he is in prison now)
- says (the lawyer is speaking now)
- does not want (her feeling today)
Quick Guide: Past hurt, were, did Present is, says, does
Word Power: 'Still' We use still when a situation does not change.
- Example: He is still in prison. (He was in prison yesterday, and he is in prison today.)
Vocabulary Learning
Manhattan District Attorney Drops Rape Charges Against Harvey Weinstein
曼哈頓區檢察官撤回對哈維·溫斯坦的強姦指控
Introduction
New York prosecutors have decided to drop a rape charge against former film executive Harvey Weinstein because the accuser is unwilling to take part in a fourth trial.
紐約檢察官決定撤回對前電影高層哈維·溫斯坦的一項強姦指控,因為指控者不願意參與第四次審理。
Main Body
The decision to end the legal process follows several court results regarding allegations made by Jessica Mann, who claimed that a non-consensual encounter happened in a Manhattan hotel in 2013. The legal history of this charge has been unstable; a 2020 conviction was later cancelled by an appeals court, and two more trials ended without a result because the juries could not agree on a verdict.
決定終止法律程序是基於先前幾次關於 Jessica Mann 指控的法院結果,她聲稱 2013 年在曼哈頓的一家酒店發生了一次非自願的接觸。該項指控的法律過程一直不穩定;2020 年的定罪隨後被上訴法院撤銷,另兩次審理則因陪審團無法達成一致裁決而未產生結果。
Different parties have expressed opposing views on the matter. District Attorney Alvin Bragg emphasized that the witness remained credible, but he noted that the repeated trials had become too stressful for Ms. Mann. On the other hand, Mr. Weinstein's lawyers argued that the relationship was consensual and claimed that the failure to get a conviction proved the charges were false. Despite this dismissal, prosecutors have requested a twenty-year prison sentence for Mr. Weinstein's conviction in the assault of Miriam Haley. Furthermore, he will stay in prison due to other convictions in New York and California.
不同當事方對此事表達了截然不同的看法。區檢察官 Alvin Bragg 強調證人依然可信,但他指出重複審理對 Mann 女士而言壓力過大。另一方面,溫斯坦的律師則辯稱該關係是自願的,並聲稱未能定罪證明了指控不實。儘管此次指控被撤銷,檢察官仍就溫斯坦襲擊 Miriam Haley 的定罪要求判處 20 年監禁。此外,由於在紐約和加州有其他定罪,他將繼續留在獄中。
Conclusion
Harvey Weinstein will remain in prison even though the charges brought by Jessica Mann have been dismissed.
雖然 Jessica Mann 提出的指控已被撤銷,但哈維·溫斯坦仍將留在獄中。
Vocabulary Learning
🌉 The 'Logic Leap': Moving from Simple to Complex Connections
An A2 student usually connects ideas with and, but, or because. To hit B2, you need to use Contrast Connectors that signal a professional, academic tone.
Look at this shift from the text:
*"...he noted that the repeated trials had become too stressful... On the other hand, Mr. Weinstein's lawyers argued..."
Why this matters for B2: Instead of saying "But the lawyers said...", using "On the other hand" allows you to balance two opposing arguments without sounding like a beginner. It creates a 'bridge' between two different perspectives.
🛠️ Level-Up Your Vocabulary: The 'Legal' Shift
Stop using generic words like say or do. The article uses Precise Verbs to describe formal actions. Notice the difference:
- A2: The lawyer said the charges were false. B2: The lawyers argued that the charges were false.
- A2: The judge stopped the case. B2: The charges have been dismissed.
- A2: The court said he was guilty. B2: A 2020 conviction was later cancelled.
The Golden Rule for B2 Fluency: Don't just describe what happened; describe the nature of the action. Argued is more powerful than said because it implies a fight or a debate.
⚠️ The 'Passive' Power Play
In A2, we love: Subject Verb Object (e.g., "The court cancelled the conviction").
In B2, we often flip the sentence to focus on the result, not the person. This is called the Passive Voice.
From the text:
"...a 2020 conviction was later cancelled by an appeals court"
By putting the conviction first, the writer emphasizes the legal status rather than the court's identity. This is the hallmark of B2 news and business English.
Vocabulary Learning
The Manhattan District Attorney's Office Discontinues Prosecution of Third-Degree Rape Charges Against Harvey Weinstein.
曼哈頓區檢察官辦公室停止對 Harvey Weinstein 的三級強姦指控進行起訴。
Introduction
New York prosecutors have elected to dismiss a rape charge against former film executive Harvey Weinstein, citing the complainant's reluctance to participate in a fourth trial.
紐約檢察官決定撤銷對前電影高層 Harvey Weinstein 的一項強姦指控,理由是原告不願參與第四次審訊。
Main Body
The decision to terminate the proceedings follows a sequence of judicial outcomes regarding allegations brought by Jessica Mann, who asserted that a non-consensual encounter occurred in a Manhattan hotel in 2013. The legal trajectory of this specific charge has been characterized by instability; an initial 2020 conviction was subsequently vacated by an appellate court, and two subsequent trials concluded in mistrials due to the jury's inability to reach a unanimous verdict.
決定終止訴訟程序是基於 Jessica Mann 提出指控後的一系列司法結果,她聲稱 2013 年在曼哈頓的一家酒店發生了非自願的性行為。這項特定指控的法律進程一直不穩定;2020 年最初的定罪隨後被上訴法院撤銷,而隨後的兩次審訊則因陪審團無法達成一致裁決而導致審訊不成立。
Stakeholder positions remain divergent. The Manhattan District Attorney, Alvin Bragg, maintained the credibility of the witness while noting that the iterative nature of the trials had become an exhaustive ordeal for Ms. Mann. Conversely, legal counsel for Mr. Weinstein contended that the relationship was consensual and argued that the repeated failure to secure a conviction indicated the charges were unfounded. Despite the dismissal of this particular count, the prosecution has recommended a twenty-year custodial sentence for Mr. Weinstein's conviction regarding the assault of Miriam Haley. Furthermore, Mr. Weinstein's continued incarceration is ensured by extant convictions in both New York and California.
利益相關者的立場依然分歧。曼哈頓區檢察官 Alvin Bragg 維持對證人可信度的認可,同時指出反覆審訊對 Mann 小姐而言已成為一場極其疲憊的折磨。相反,Weinstein 先生的法律代表則主張該關係是自願的,並認為多次未能定罪表明指控毫無根據。儘管這項特定項次被撤銷,但檢方已就 Weinstein 先生襲擊 Miriam Haley 的定罪建議判處 20 年監禁。此外,由於在紐約和加州仍有現行定罪,Weinstein 先生將繼續被監禁。
Conclusion
Harvey Weinstein remains incarcerated despite the dismissal of the charges brought by Jessica Mann.
儘管 Jessica Mann 的指控被撤銷,Harvey Weinstein 依然被監禁中。
Vocabulary Learning
The Architecture of Legal Neutrality: Nominalization and the 'Passive-Aggressive' Academic Tone
To move from B2 to C2, a student must stop describing actions and start describing concepts. The provided text is a masterclass in Nominalization—the process of turning verbs into nouns to strip away emotional urgency and replace it with objective, clinical precision.
⚖️ The Pivot from Process to Entity
Compare a B2 construction with the C2 legal prose used in the article:
- B2 (Action-oriented): "The court vacated the conviction because they decided the first trial was wrong."
- C2 (Entity-oriented): "...an initial 2020 conviction was subsequently vacated by an appellate court..."
In the C2 version, the conviction becomes the subject. The focus shifts from the people acting to the legal status of the event. This creates a "distanced" perspective essential for high-level academic and judicial writing.
🧩 Lexical Precision: The 'C2 Clusters'
Notice the specific collocation chains that signal high-level proficiency. These are not just "big words," but precise instruments of meaning:
- "Iterative nature" Instead of saying "happening over and over," the author uses iterative to suggest a repetitive process within a system.
- "Extant convictions" Extant is used instead of "existing" to emphasize that these convictions still hold legal force in the present moment.
- "Divergent positions" Rather than "disagreeing," divergent implies a structural split in perspectives that cannot be easily reconciled.
🛠️ Syntactic Sophistication: The Semicolon Bridge
Observe the use of the semicolon to link a general state of instability with specific evidence:
*"The legal trajectory... has been characterized by instability; an initial 2020 conviction was subsequently vacated..."
At the C2 level, the semicolon is not just a comma replacement; it is a logical operator. It tells the reader: "I have presented a thesis (instability), and I am now providing the immediate empirical proof without breaking the sentence's momentum."
C2 Takeaway: To achieve mastery, stop focusing on who did what. Start focusing on what phenomenon occurred and use Latinate adjectives (extant, iterative, divergent) to categorize the state of that phenomenon.