Police videos show that Vickrum Digwa lied about the death of Henry Nowak.

警方影片顯示 Vickrum Digwa 在 Henry Nowak 死亡事件中撒了謊。

Vickrum Digwa killed Henry Nowak with a large knife. Digwa said Henry attacked him first. The judge said this was a lie. Henry did not attack Digwa.

Vickrum Digwa 使用一把大刀殺害了 Henry Nowak。Digwa 聲稱 Henry 先攻擊他。法官表示這是謊言，Henry 並未攻擊 Digwa。

Police treated the two men differently. Police put handcuffs on Henry. Henry was very sick and could not breathe. Police did not put handcuffs on Digwa. Digwa took off his own turban to look like a victim.

警方對這兩名男子的對待方式截然不同。警方給 Henry 戴上手銬，但 Henry 當時病得很重且無法呼吸。警方則沒有給 Digwa 戴上手銬。Digwa 脫掉了自己的頭巾，試圖讓自己看起來像個受害者。

Many people in Southampton became angry and fought in the streets. Now, a special group is checking the police work. The government wants to give Digwa a longer time in prison.

許多南安普頓的居民感到憤怒並在街頭發生衝突。現在，一個特別小組正在調查警方的工作。政府希望給予 Digwa 更長的監禁期限。

The police and the courts are still checking this case.

警方與法院仍在調查此案。

Recently released police body-camera footage has proven that the claims made by Vickrum Digwa about the death of Henry Nowak in Southampton were false.

最近公布的警方隨身攝影機片段證明，Vickrum Digwa 關於 Southampton 發生之 Henry Nowak 之死的說法是虛假的。

The court decided that 23-year-old Vickrum Digwa murdered 18-year-old student Henry Nowak by stabbing him five times. Evidence showed that Digwa used a knife that was larger than a legal Sikh ceremonial kirpan. Judge William Mousley KC rejected Digwa's claim of self-defense, stating that the victim was defenseless and had not behaved in a racist way. Furthermore, tests showed that the victim was not drunk, which contradicted Digwa's earlier statements.

法院裁定 23 歲的 Vickrum Digwa 透過五次刺擊謀殺了 18 歲學生 Henry Nowak。證據顯示 Digwa 使用的刀比法律允許的錫克教儀式短劍（kirpan）更大。法官 William Mousley KC 駁回了 Digwa 自衛的說法，指出受害者毫無還手能力，且並未有種族歧視行為。此外，測試顯示受害者當時並未醉酒，這與 Digwa 先前的陳述相矛盾。

The video footage reveals that the Hampshire Police treated the two men very differently. Although the victim was seriously injured and having trouble breathing, the police kept him in handcuffs. In contrast, Digwa was not restrained during his arrest or his four-day detention. The footage shows Digwa lying to officers by claiming he was a victim of a racial attack and that his turban was forced off. The prosecution emphasized that the video suggests Digwa actually removed his own turban to make himself look like a victim.

影片畫面顯示，漢普郡警方（Hampshire Police）對兩名男子的對待方式截然不同。儘管受害者傷勢嚴重且呼吸困難，警方仍將其戴上手銬。相比之下，Digwa 在被捕或被拘留的四天期間並未受到限制。畫面顯示 Digwa 向警員撒謊，聲稱自己是種族攻擊的受害者且頭巾被強行扯下。檢方強調，影片顯示 Digwa 實際上是自行除掉頭巾，以使自己看起來像受害者。

This event caused significant violent protests in Southampton, leading to 25 charges of public disorder. Consequently, the Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) has started an investigation into the police's behavior. Additionally, the Attorney General's office has sent Digwa's life sentence, which has a minimum of 21 years, to the Court of Appeal because it may have been too lenient.

此事件在 Southampton 引發了嚴重的暴力抗議，導致 25 人被指控擾亂公共秩序。因此，警方行為獨立監督辦公室（IOPC）已開始調查警方的行為。此外，總檢察長辦公室已將 Digwa 的終身監禁（最低刑期 21 年）提交至上訴法院，因為該量刑可能過輕。

The case is still being reviewed by the IOPC and a formal inquest in Winchester, while the sentence is waiting for a final court decision.

此案目前仍由 IOPC 及溫徹斯特（Winchester）的正式死因研訊審理中，而量刑則在等待法院的最終決定。

Newly released police body-worn footage has corroborated the falsity of claims made by Vickrum Digwa regarding the circumstances surrounding the death of Henry Nowak in Southampton.

新公布的警察隨身攝影機畫面，證實了 Vickrum Digwa 關於 Henry Nowak 在 Southampton 死亡經過之說法為虛假。

The judicial proceedings concluded that Vickrum Digwa, 23, murdered 18-year-old student Henry Nowak by inflicting five stab wounds, including a fatal thoracic injury. Evidence presented at Southampton Crown Court indicated that Digwa utilized a blade exceeding the dimensions of a legal Sikh ceremonial kirpan. The court rejected Digwa's assertions of self-defense, with Judge William Mousley KC determining that the victim had not engaged in racist behavior and was defenceless during the assault. It was further established that the victim's blood alcohol concentration was insufficient to trigger a positive breathalyzer result, contradicting Digwa's claims of intoxication.

司法程序裁定，23 歲的 Vickrum Digwa 謀殺了 18 歲的學生 Henry Nowak，造成五處刺傷，包括一處致命的胸腔傷口。Southampton Crown Court 提交的證據顯示，Digwa 使用的刀刃尺寸超過了合法的錫克教儀式短劍 (kirpan)。法官 William Mousley KC 駁回了 Digwa 關於正當防衛的主張，判定被害人並未有種族歧視行為，且在襲擊過程中毫無還手能力。法院進一步確定，被害人的血液酒精濃度不足以導致酒精測試呈陽性，這與 Digwa 聲稱其醉酒的說法相悖。

Analysis of the body-worn video reveals a significant disparity in the treatment of the two parties by Hampshire Constabulary. While the victim was restrained in handcuffs despite his critical condition and reports of respiratory distress, Digwa remained unrestrained throughout his arrest and subsequent four-day detention. The footage documents Digwa providing a fabricated narrative to officers, alleging a racial attack and the forcible removal of his turban. These claims were initially validated by an officer's verbal affirmations. The prosecution noted that visual evidence suggests Digwa manually removed his turban to simulate victimhood.

對隨身攝影機畫面的分析顯示，Hampshire Constabulary 對待雙方的方式存在顯著差異。儘管被害人情況危急且有呼吸困難報告，仍被戴上 handcuffs 限制；而 Digwa 在被捕及隨後四天的拘留期間則未受限制。畫面記錄了 Digwa 向警員提供虛構的陳述，聲稱遭到種族攻擊並被強行除掉頭巾。這些說法最初獲得一名警員的口頭認可。檢方指出，影像證據顯示 Digwa 是自行除掉頭巾以偽裝成受害者。

This incident precipitated substantial civil unrest in Southampton, resulting in 25 charges of violent disorder. The disparity in police conduct has prompted an investigation by the Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC). Furthermore, the Attorney General's office has referred Digwa's life sentence, with a 21-year minimum term, to the Court of Appeal under the unduly lenient sentence (ULS) scheme.

此事件引發了 Southampton 劇烈的社會動盪，導致 25 人被指控暴力騷亂。警方執法上的差異已觸發獨立警察行為監察辦公室 (IOPC) 的調查。此外，總檢察長辦公室根據「過輕判刑」(ULS) 機制，將 Digwa 被判處終身監禁（最低服刑 21 年）的判決移交上訴法院。

The case remains under official review via an IOPC investigation and a pending inquest in Winchester, while the sentencing is subject to appellate review.

本案仍由 IOPC 調查及在 Winchester 進行的驗屍聆訊持續審核，而量刑結果則有待上訴法院覆核。