Florida and Pennsylvania have new laws for AI data centers. These laws help with costs and land use.

佛羅里達州與賓夕法尼亞州針對 AI 數據中心出台了新法律，旨在協助解決成本與土地使用問題。

Florida has a new law. Big AI centers must pay all their own power bills. They cannot make normal people pay more for electricity. However, the state gives these centers a tax break if they spend a lot of money.

佛羅里達州有一項新法律。大型 AI 中心必須支付所有電費，不能讓一般民眾承擔更高的電費。然而，如果這些中心投入大量資金，州政府將提供稅務優惠。

Pennsylvania also has new rules. Companies must use clean energy and give jobs to local people to get tax breaks. Also, local towns can stop new data center plans for 180 days to think about the rules.

賓夕法尼亞州也有新規定。公司必須使用清潔能源並為當地人提供就業機會，才能獲得稅務優惠。此外，地方城鎮可以將新的數據中心計劃暫緩 180 天，以便審視相關規定。

Some people are worried. They think these centers use too much water and power. But some companies say these centers help the community with money from property taxes.

有些人感到擔心，認為這些中心消耗過多水電。但部分公司表示，這些中心透過房產稅為社區提供資金，對社區有所幫助。

Both states want more technology. But they also want to protect people and the earth.

兩個州都希望引入更多科技，但同時也想保護民眾與地球。

State governments in Florida and Pennsylvania are introducing new laws to manage the growth of artificial intelligence (AI) data centers. These measures focus on how utility costs are paid and how local cities can control zoning.

佛羅里達州與賓夕法尼亞州的州政府正推出新法律，以管理人工智慧 (AI) 數據中心的成長。這些措施重點在於公共事業費用的支付方式，以及地方城市如何控制分區規劃。

In Florida, the government passed Senate Bill 484, which requires large AI data centers to pay for all their own utility costs. This law prevents companies from passing infrastructure expenses on to residents or small businesses. At the same time, Florida offers tax exemptions on equipment and electricity to attract tech companies. These incentives have been extended until 2025, and possibly until 2037, as long as companies invest at least $150 million and meet specific power requirements. Consequently, Florida is trying to attract high-tech investment while protecting citizens from rising energy bills.

在佛羅里達州，政府通過了參議院第 484 號法案，要求大型 AI 數據中心必須自行支付所有公共事業成本。這項法律防止公司將基礎建設費用轉嫁給居民或小型企業。同時，佛羅里達州提供設備與電費的稅務豁免以吸引科技公司。只要公司投資至少 1.5 億美元並滿足特定電力要求，這些優惠將延長至 2025 年，甚至可能到 2037 年。因此，佛羅里達州試圖在吸引高科技投資的同時，保護公民免受電費上漲的影響。

Similarly, Pennsylvania is working to reduce the negative impact of these facilities on local communities. House Bill 2650 suggests that developers must prove they use clean energy and create local jobs to receive tax breaks. If they fail these annual checks, they must pay back the taxes. Furthermore, House Bill 2496 allows local municipalities to pause data center applications for 180 days. This gives cities more time to create zoning rules, reflecting a cautious approach to the environmental and infrastructure pressure caused by high-density computing.

同樣地，賓夕法尼亞州正致力於減少這些設施對當地社區的負面影響。眾議院第 2650 號法案建議，開發商必須證明其使用清潔能源並創造本地就業機會，方可獲得稅收減免。若未能通過年度審核，則必須補繳稅款。此外，眾議院第 2496 號法案允許地方自治市將數據中心申請暫停 180 天。這使城市有更多時間制定分區規則，反映出對於高密度運算所導致的環境與基礎建設壓力採取謹慎態度。

There is a clear tension between economic growth and public opinion. In Florida, some local governments have temporarily stopped approving projects due to worries about water and power grid capacity. This matches national trends, as Gallup data shows that many people oppose building data centers in their areas. On the other hand, companies like Iron Mountain emphasize that tax exemptions encourage investment without using taxpayer money, asserting that their property taxes provide significant benefits to the community.

經濟成長與公眾意見之間存在明顯的緊張關係。在佛羅里達州，部分地方政府因擔心水資源與電網容量，已暫時停止核准項目。這與全國趨勢一致，蓋根據 Gallup 數據顯示，許多人反對在居住地興建數據中心。另一方面，如 Iron Mountain 等公司則強調，稅務豁免在不使用納稅人資金的情況下鼓勵投資，並聲稱其財產稅為社區帶來了顯著利益。

Both states are moving toward stricter regulations to balance the growth of technology with environmental sustainability and consumer protection.

兩州均趨向採取更嚴格的監管，以在技術成長、環境永續性與消費者保護之間取得平衡。

State governments in Florida and Pennsylvania are implementing legislative measures to manage the proliferation of artificial intelligence data centers, focusing on utility cost allocation and municipal zoning authority.

佛羅里達州與賓夕法尼亞州的州政府正採取立法措施以管理人工智慧數據中心的擴張，重點在於公共事業成本分攤與市政分區權限。

The Florida administration has enacted Senate Bill 484, which mandates that large-scale AI data centers assume full responsibility for their utility expenditures. This statutory framework prohibits the transfer of infrastructure and operational costs to residential or small-business consumers. Concurrently, the state maintains a fiscal regime of sales and use tax exemptions for data center equipment and electricity. While these incentives were originally slated for expiration in 2022, they have been extended through 2025 and potentially until 2037, provided that facilities meet a capital investment threshold of $150 million and an IT load of 100 megawatts. This dual approach indicates a strategic attempt to attract high-technology investment while insulating the domestic electorate from associated energy costs.

佛羅里達州政府通過了第 484 號參議院法案，強制要求大型人工智慧數據中心需全權負責其公共事業支出。該法定框架禁止將基礎設施與營運成本轉嫁給住宅或小型企業消費者。與此同時，該州維持對數據中心設備與電費免除銷售稅與使用稅的財政制度。雖然這些優惠原定於 2022 年到期，但只要設施滿足 1.5 億美元的資本投資門檻及 100 百萬瓦的 IT 負載，優惠將延長至 2025 年，甚至可能延至 2037 年。這種雙管齊下的方式表明，州政府試圖在吸引高科技投資的同時，使本地選民免於承受相關的能源成本。

In Pennsylvania, legislative efforts are similarly focused on the mitigation of community impact. House Bill 2650 proposes the imposition of strict standards for developers seeking tax abatements, requiring evidence of clean energy procurement and the provision of regional employment. Failure to adhere to these annual assessments would necessitate the repayment of abated taxes. Furthermore, House Bill 2496 seeks to empower municipalities by permitting a 180-day moratorium on data center applications to facilitate the development of local zoning ordinances. These measures reflect a broader trend of institutional caution regarding the environmental and infrastructural strain imposed by high-density computing facilities.

在賓夕法尼亞州，立法努力同樣集中於減輕對社區的影響。第 2650 號眾議院法案建議對尋求稅務減免的開發商實施嚴格標準，要求提供採購潔淨能源與提供區域就業的證明。若未能通過這些年度評估，則必須償還已減免的稅款。此外，第 2496 號眾議院法案旨在賦權給市政單位，允許對數據中心申請實施 180 天的暫緩期，以利於制定當地分區條例。這些措施反映了機構對於高密度計算設施所造成的環境與基礎設施壓力持有較為謹慎的趨勢。

Stakeholder positioning reveals a tension between economic development and public sentiment. In Florida, local governments have initiated temporary pauses on project approvals due to concerns regarding water resources and grid capacity. This aligns with broader national trends, as indicated by Gallup data showing significant public opposition to local data center construction. Conversely, corporate entities, such as Iron Mountain, contend that tax exemptions stimulate investment without constituting a direct taxpayer subsidy, asserting that property tax contributions provide substantial community benefits.

利益相關者的立場揭示了經濟發展與公眾情緒之間的緊張關係。在佛羅里達州，由於對水資源與電網容量的擔憂，地方政府已開始暫停核准項目。這與全美趨勢一致，Gallup 的數據顯示公眾強烈反對在當地建設數據中心。相反，如 Iron Mountain 等企業實體則主張，稅務豁免是刺激投資而非構成對納稅人的直接補貼，並認為房產稅的貢獻為社區帶來了實質利益。

Both jurisdictions are currently transitioning toward more restrictive regulatory environments to balance technological expansion with consumer protection and environmental sustainability.

兩個司法管轄區目前均正向更為嚴格的監管環境過渡，以平衡技術擴張與消費者保護及環境永續性。