The US Supreme Court says the government can stop a special protection program for people from Haiti and Syria.

美國最高法院表示，政府可以停止一項針對海地與敘利亞人的特別保護計畫。

The court had a vote. Six judges said yes and three judges said no. Now, the government can take away the legal status of these people. The judges say the government has the power to make this choice.

法院進行了投票。六名法官贊成，三名法官反對。現在，政府可以取消這些人的合法身分。法官表示，政府有權做出此決定。

About 350,000 people from Haiti and some people from Syria are now undocumented. This means they do not have legal papers to stay in the US. Some lawyers are sad because the courts cannot stop this now.

約 35 萬名海地人與部分敘利亞人現在成為無證件身分。這意味著他們沒有合法文件留在美國。一些律師感到遺憾，因為法院現在無法阻止此事。

In Springfield, Ohio, many Haitian people work in factories. Now, these workers might have to leave. Local leaders are worried. They say Haiti is dangerous and has many gangs. Governor Mike DeWine says this decision is a mistake.

在俄亥俄州的 Springfield，許多海地人在工廠工作。現在，這些工人可能必須離開。當地領導人感到擔憂。他們表示海地很危險且有許多幫派。州長 Mike DeWine 表示這項決定是一個錯誤。

Many people are now afraid. They worry about their jobs and their safety.

許多人現在感到恐懼，他們擔心自己的工作與安全。

The United States Supreme Court has decided that the Department of Homeland Security is allowed to cancel Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for people from Haiti and Syria.

美國最高法院已決定，國土安全部獲准取消海地與敘利亞人士的臨時受保護身份 (TPS)。

In the case of Mullin v. Doe, the Court ruled 6-3 in favor of the government. Justice Samuel Alito wrote that the law prevents courts from reviewing the Secretary's decision to end these protections. Furthermore, the Court stated that there was not enough evidence to prove that racial prejudice influenced the decision. Justice Clarence Thomas also argued that non-citizens are not protected by the 14th Amendment's equal protection clause.

在 Mullin v. Doe 案中，法院以 6 比 3 票裁定政府勝訴。大法官 Samuel Alito 寫道，法律禁止法院對部長終止這些保護措施的決定進行審查。此外，法院表示沒有足夠證據證明種族偏見影響了該決定。大法官 Clarence Thomas 亦主張，非公民不受第 14 條修正案中平等保護條款的保障。

This decision follows a period of legal uncertainty. In March 2025, the government tried to end TPS, but lower courts in New York and Washington D.C. initially stopped them. However, this new ruling cancels those previous orders. Consequently, about 350,000 Haitians and several thousand Syrians are now undocumented. Lawyers for the affected people emphasized that this ruling removes the ability of courts to oversee the actions of government agencies.

此決定是在一段法律不確定期之後做出的。2025 年 3 月，政府嘗試終止 TPS，但紐約與華盛頓特區的下級法院最初阻止了他們。然而，這次的新裁定取消了之前的那些命令。因此，約 35 萬名海地人與數千名敘利亞人目前成為非法移民。受影響人士的律師強調，此裁定剝奪了法院監督政府機關行動的能力。

In Springfield, Ohio, this decision is causing significant social and economic instability. Since 2018, many Haitian migrants have moved to the city and become essential workers in factories and services. Local groups, such as the Haitian Community Support Center, are worried about the humanitarian risks of returning to Haiti, where there is no stable government and widespread gang violence. Governor Mike DeWine called the decision a mistake because of the terrible conditions in Haiti, although some local residents still support the government's strict immigration rules.

在俄亥俄州的 Springfield，此決定正引起顯著的社會與經濟不穩定。自 2018 年起，許多海地移民移居該市，並在工廠與服務業中成為必要的勞動力。本地團體（如海地社區支持中心）擔心返回海地會面臨人道主義風險，因為當地缺乏穩定政府且黑幫暴力猖獗。州長 Mike DeWine 稱此決定是一個錯誤，因為海地環境極其糟糕，儘管部分當地居民仍支持政府嚴格的移民規則。

The ruling has left hundreds of thousands of TPS holders in a dangerous legal position, leading to local protests and fears of economic decline in affected cities.

此次裁定使數十萬名 TPS 持有者陷入危險的法律處境，導致當地出現抗議，並引起受影響城市對經濟衰退的擔憂。

The United States Supreme Court has issued a decision permitting the Department of Homeland Security to revoke Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for individuals from Haiti and Syria.

美國最高法院已做出裁決，允許國土安全部撤銷海地與敘利亞人士的臨時保護狀態 (TPS)。

The judicial determination in Mullin v. Doe resulted in a 6-3 ruling in favor of the Department of Homeland Security. The majority opinion, authored by Justice Samuel Alito, asserted that the TPS statute precludes judicial review of the Secretary's determination regarding the termination of such designations. Furthermore, the Court held that the respondents failed to provide sufficient evidence to establish that racial animus influenced the termination process. Justice Clarence Thomas concurrently posited that non-citizens are not afforded protections under the 14th Amendment’s equal protection clause.

Mullin v. Doe 的司法判定結果為 6 比 3，國土安全部勝訴。由大法官 Samuel Alito 撰寫的多數意見書主張，TPS 法規排除法院對部長關於終止此類指定之決定進行司法審查。此外，法院認定答辯方未能提供充分證據，證明種族歧視影響了終止程序。大法官 Clarence Thomas 同時認為，非公民無法在第 14 條修正案的平等保護條款下獲得保障。

This legal development follows a period of administrative volatility. In March 2025, the Department of Homeland Security attempted to terminate TPS, a move that was initially blocked by lower courts in New York and Washington D.C. The current ruling effectively nullifies those injunctions, rendering approximately 350,000 Haitian and several thousand Syrian nationals undocumented. Legal counsel for the respondents characterized the ruling as a removal of judicial oversight over executive agency actions.

此法律進展發生在一段行政動盪期之後。2025 年 3 月，國土安全部試圖終止 TPS，此舉最初被紐約與華盛頓特區的下級法院攔截。目前的裁決有效地廢止了那些禁制令，使得約 35 萬名海地國民與數千名敘利亞國民成為無證件身分。答辯方的法律代表將此裁決定性為取消對行政機關行為的司法監督。

In Springfield, Ohio, the impact is manifested through significant socio-economic instability. The city, which has seen an influx of Haitian migrants since 2018, now faces the potential mass departure of a workforce integral to its manufacturing and service sectors. Local stakeholders, including the Haitian Community Support Center and the Springfield G92 coalition, have expressed concerns regarding the humanitarian implications of repatriation to Haiti, where governance is largely absent and gang violence is pervasive. Governor Mike DeWine described the decision as a mistake, citing the catastrophic conditions within Haiti. Conversely, a minority of local residents have expressed support for the administration's restrictive immigration measures.

在俄亥俄州斯普林菲爾德 (Springfield)，影響體現為顯著的社會經濟不穩定。該市自 2018 年以來有大量海地移民湧入，如今面臨對其製造業與服務業至關重要的勞動力可能大規模撤離的風險。包括海地社區支援中心與 Springfield G92 聯盟在內的本地利益相關者，對遣返海地的人道影響表示擔憂，因為海地目前的治理功能基本喪失且幫派暴力盛行。州長 Mike DeWine 將此決定描述為一個錯誤，並引用海地災難性的環境作為理由。相反地，少數本地居民則對政府限制移民的措施表示支持。

The ruling has created immediate legal precariousness for hundreds of thousands of TPS holders, prompting local advocacy efforts and fears of systemic economic decline in affected municipalities.

此裁決使數十萬名 TPS 持有者立即陷入法律困境，促使本地展開倡議行動，並引發受影響市鎮對系統性經濟衰退的恐懼。