Chamath Palihapitiya wants to change the H-1B visa program. He wants the US to get the best workers from other countries.

Chamath Palihapitiya 想要改變 H-1B 簽證計畫。他希望美國能吸引到來自其他國家最優秀的勞工。

In the past, the visa system worked well. A few people applied, and the US got great innovators like Elon Musk.

過去，簽證制度運作良好。申請人數較少，美國因此獲得了像 Elon Musk 這樣優秀的創新者。

Now, the system has a big problem. 800,000 people want visas, but only 20,000 people can get them.

現在，該制度面臨一個巨大的問題。有 80 萬人申請簽證，但僅有 2 萬人能獲得。

Some big companies use the system in a bad way. This makes wages lower for other workers. Many people in the US are angry about this.

部分大公司濫用了這個制度。這導致其他勞工的工資降低，令許多美國人感到憤怒。

The US needs a new system. It should choose workers based on their skills, not by luck.

美國需要一個新制度。應該根據勞工的技能來選擇，而非憑運氣。

Venture capitalist Chamath Palihapitiya has called for a complete update of the H-1B visa program to ensure that the United States continues to attract the world's most talented professionals.

風險投資家 Chamath Palihapitiya 呼籲全面更新 H-1B 簽證計劃，以確保美國能繼續吸引全球最頂尖的專業人才。

The discussion regarding the H-1B visa system is based on the difference between how it worked in the past and its current problems. Palihapitiya emphasizes that in the early 2000s, the program helped high-impact innovators, such as Elon Musk, enter the country because there were fewer applicants compared to the number of available visas. In contrast, the current system faces a huge imbalance, as approximately 800,000 people now compete for only 20,000 available slots.

關於 H-1B 簽證制度的討論，是基於其過去的運作方式與目前的問題之間的差異。Palihapitiya 強調，在 2000 年代初期，由於申請人數少於可用簽證配額，該計劃幫助了許多具有高影響力的創新者（例如 Elon Musk）進入美國。相反，目前的制度面臨巨大的失衡，目前約有 80 萬人競爭僅 2 萬個可用名額。

Furthermore, there is a conflict between the need for skilled immigrants and a lack of public trust. Palihapitiya asserts that a small number of companies are exploiting the current system, which consequently pushes out exceptional candidates. He also acknowledges that many people believe the program is used to lower wages, leading to resentment among American workers. Therefore, he argues that the only way to regain public support is to admit these systemic abuses and implement reforms based on merit.

此外，對高技術移民的需求與公眾信任不足之間存在衝突。Palihapitiya 主張，少數公司正在利用目前的制度，進而將優秀的候選人排擠在外。他也承認許多人認為該計劃被用來降低工資，導致美國工人感到憤慨。因此，他認為重新贏得公眾支持的唯一方法，就是承認這些系統性濫用，並根據 merit（才幹）實施改革。

The current situation requires a shift from a system based on the number of applications to one based on quality and merit to keep the country competitive.

目前的情況需要將制度從「基於申請數量」轉向「基於質量與才幹」，以維持國家的競爭力。

Venture capitalist Chamath Palihapitiya has advocated for the systemic overhaul of the H-1B visa program to ensure the continued acquisition of global intellectual capital.

風險投資家 Chamath Palihapitiya 主張對 H-1B 簽證計畫進行系統性改革，以確保能持續獲取全球人才的知識資本。

The discourse regarding the H-1B visa framework is predicated upon a perceived divergence between historical utility and contemporary dysfunction. Palihapitiya posits that during the early 2000s, the program facilitated the entry of high-impact innovators—citing figures such as Elon Musk and Urs Hölzle—due to a lower volume of applicants relative to available quotas. This historical epoch is contrasted with the current state of the system, characterized by a significant numerical imbalance where approximately 800,000 applications compete for 20,000 available slots.

關於 H-1B 簽證框架的討論，是基於對過往效用與現今失能之間存在分歧的看法。Palihapitiya 指出，在 2000 年代初期，由於申請人數相對配額較少，該計畫方便了高影響力的創新者進入——例如 Elon Musk 和 Urs Hölzle 等人物。這段歷史時期與目前的系統狀態形成對比，目前的系統特徵是嚴重的數量失衡，約有 80 萬份申請競爭 2 萬個可用名額。

Stakeholder positioning reveals a tension between the necessity of skilled immigration and the erosion of public confidence. Palihapitiya asserts that the current mechanism is susceptible to exploitation by a limited number of corporate entities, which he contends has resulted in the marginalization of exceptional candidates. Furthermore, he acknowledges a prevailing public perception that the program has been utilized as a tool for wage suppression, thereby generating domestic resentment. Consequently, he argues that a rapprochement between the immigration system and the American populace can only be achieved through a transparent acknowledgment of these systemic abuses and the implementation of merit-based reforms.

利益相關者的立場顯示，對熟練移民的需求與公眾信心下降之間存在緊張關係。Palihapitiya 主張，目前的機制容易被少數企業利用，他認為這導致了優秀候選人的邊緣化。此外，他承認公眾普遍認為該計畫被用作壓低薪資的工具，從而引起國內反感。因此，他認為只有透過透明地承認這些系統性濫用，並實施以才幹為基礎的改革，才能在移民系統與美國民眾之間達成和解。

The current situation involves a call for the transition from a quantitative application process to a qualitative, merit-centric system to maintain national competitiveness.

目前的狀況是呼籲將申請過程從「量化」轉型為「質化」且以才幹為中心的系統，以維持國家競爭力。