Police in California are checking an animal shelter. They found many dead dogs at the place.

加州警方正在調查一間動物收容所，他們在該處發現了許多死狗。

Police started the work in April. Some people told them the shelter was bad. Police found 117 dead dogs in the ground. X-rays show that many dogs died from guns.

警方於四月開始調查。有些人告訴他們該收容所狀況糟糕。警方在地下發現了 117 隻死狗。X 光檢查顯示許多狗死於槍擊。

Police found a barn. They found 600 collars and many bones there. Another shelter sent two puppies to this place. Those two puppies are now dead.

警方發現了一座穀倉，在那裡找到了 600 個項圈和許多骨頭。另一間收容所曾將兩隻小狗送至此地，而那兩隻小狗現在都死了。

The shelter took money from people. People gave money to help the dogs. But the owner says the shelter is good. The owner says they only kill very sick dogs.

該收容所向民眾收取款項，人們捐款是為了幫助狗隻。但經營者表示收容所運作良好，並稱他們僅處置病況極其嚴重的小狗。

The police are still working. They are talking to people to find the truth about the animals.

警方仍在調查中，他們正透過詢問相關人士來查明動物們的真相。

Police in Humboldt County, California, are investigating a no-kill animal shelter after discovering the remains of many dogs on the property.

加州洪堡縣警方在一家不殺戮動物庇護所發現許多狗的遺骸後，目前正在進行調查。

The investigation began in April after the Humboldt County Sheriff's Office received reports of fraud and animal abuse. Animal advocates helped start the process by using surveillance and digging to find possible burial sites. Later, experts used ground-penetrating radar to find 117 dog bodies in different stages of decay. X-rays and bullet fragments suggest that many of the dogs were killed by gunshots. Furthermore, investigators believe a barn was used for the killings, where they found over 600 collars and several skulls.

此次調查始於四月，當時洪堡縣警長辦公室收到關於詐騙與虐待動物的舉報。動物權益倡導者透過監視與挖掘尋找可能的埋葬地點，協助啟動了調查程序。隨後，專家使用地下穿透雷達發現了 117 具處於不同腐爛階段的狗屍。X 光片與子彈碎片顯示，許多狗是被槍擊殺死。此外，調查人員認為其中一座穀倉被用於殺戮，他們在那裡發現了 600 多個項圈與幾個頭骨。

This situation also affects other organizations. For example, the Palm Springs Animal Shelter confirmed that two puppies they sent to the facility were among the dead dogs. This shows the risks involved in transferring animals between shelters. Financially, Miranda’s Rescue collected fees and donations meant for medical care and staff. However, the owner of the rescue insists that the facility follows a no-kill policy. She asserted that animals are only put down if they are terminally ill or dangerous, and she emphasized that the media reports are inaccurate.

這種情況也影響了其他組織。例如，棕櫚泉動物庇護所確認他們送到該設施的兩隻小狗也在死狗之列。這顯示了在不同庇護所之間轉移動物所涉及的風險。在財務方面，Miranda’s Rescue 收取了原定用於醫療護理與員工開支的費用與捐款。然而，庇護所的所有者堅持該設施遵循不殺戮政策。她聲稱只有在動物患有絕症或具有危險性時才會被安樂死，並強調媒體報導並不準確。

The investigation is still ongoing as authorities analyze forensic evidence and interview witnesses to find out what happened to all the animals sent to the facility.

由於當局正分析法醫證據並訪談證人，以查明所有被送往該設施的動物究竟發生了什麼事，因此調查仍在進行中。

Law enforcement authorities in Humboldt County, California, are investigating a no-kill animal shelter following the discovery of numerous canine remains on the premises.

加州亨博爾特縣的執法部門在一個不採取安樂死政策的動物庇護所發現大量犬類遺骸，目前正展開調查。

The inquiry commenced in April after the Humboldt County Sheriff's Office received intelligence alleging the commission of fraud, conspiracy, and felony animal abuse. The initial impetus for the investigation was provided by animal advocates who utilized surveillance technology and physical excavation to identify potential burial sites. Subsequent forensic analysis, employing ground-penetrating radar, resulted in the recovery of 117 intact canine corpses in varying stages of decomposition. X-ray examinations and the presence of ballistic fragments in the vicinity suggest that gunshot wounds were the primary cause of death for many of the recovered remains. Furthermore, investigators identified a barn as the probable site of the killings and recovered over 600 collars, 21 skulls, and various skeletal fragments.

此項調查始於四月，當時亨博爾特縣警長辦公室收到情報，指控有人涉嫌詐騙、共謀及重罪虐待動物。調查的最初動力來自於動物權益倡導者，他們利用監視技術和實際挖掘來識別潛在的埋葬地點。隨後使用地面穿透雷達進行法醫分析，結果回收了 117 具處於不同腐爛階段的完整犬類屍體。X 光檢查以及周邊發現的彈片顯示，許多遺骸的主要死因是槍擊傷。

The institutional implications extend to third-party organizations; for instance, the Palm Springs Animal Shelter confirmed that two puppies transferred to the facility were among the recovered remains. This highlights the vulnerability of inter-shelter transfer programs. Financially, Miranda’s Rescue operated by collecting transfer fees and soliciting donations intended for veterinary care, staffing, and facility maintenance. Despite these findings, the proprietor of Miranda’s Rescue maintains that the facility adheres to a no-kill policy, asserting that euthanasia is performed only in instances of terminal illness or significant public safety risks. The administration characterized the current media narrative as an inaccurate representation of their operational mission.

該事件的影響延伸至第三方機構；例如，棕櫚泉動物庇護所確認兩隻轉移至該設施的小狗也在回收的遺骸之中。這凸顯了庇護所間轉移計畫的脆弱性。在財務方面，Miranda’s Rescue 透過收取轉移費及募集原定用於獸醫護理、人員配置和設施維護的捐款來運作。儘管有這些發現，Miranda’s Rescue 的所有者仍堅持該設施遵守不採取安樂死的政策，聲稱僅在末期疾病或對公共安全構成重大風險的情況下才執行安樂死。管理層將目前的媒體敘事描述為對其運作使命的不準確呈現。

The investigation remains active as authorities process forensic data and interview witnesses to determine the fate of all animals surrendered to the facility.

調查目前仍在進行中，當局正處理法醫數據並訪問證人，以確定所有交付給該設施的動物之最終下場。