Indian courts made decisions about two people: Asaram and Sonam Raghuvanshi.

印度法院針對兩人做出了裁決：Asaram 與 Sonam Raghuvanshi。

Asaram is in prison for a crime from 2013. He asked the Supreme Court for help. The court said no to his request for bail. He must stay in prison unless his life is in great danger.

Asaram 因 2013 年的一宗罪行而被監禁。他向最高法院尋求幫助，但法院拒絕了他的保釋請求。除非其生命處於極大危險，否則他必須留在獄中。

Sonam Raghuvanshi is a suspect in her husband's death. The Meghalaya High Court let her stay out of prison on bail. The court said the police did not follow the rules during her arrest.

Sonam Raghuvanshi 是其丈夫死亡案的嫌疑人。梅加拉亞高等法院允許她保釋出獄。法院表示警方在逮捕她時未遵守相關規定。

The family of the dead husband is unhappy. They want to ask the Supreme Court to put Sonam back in prison.

死者的家屬對此感到不滿。他們希望向最高法院申請將 Sonam 重新監禁。

Asaram stays in prison. Sonam Raghuvanshi stays free for now.

Asaram 繼續被監禁。Sonam Raghuvanshi 目前恢復自由。

The Indian courts have recently made decisions regarding the detention and bail of two well-known individuals: the convicted Asaram and the accused Sonam Raghuvanshi.

印度法院最近針對兩位知名人士的拘留與保釋做出決定：分別是被定罪的 Asaram 以及被起訴的 Sonam Raghuvanshi。

In the case of Asaram, the Supreme Court has agreed to review a challenge against a Rajasthan High Court ruling. This ruling confirmed his conviction for the sexual assault of a minor in 2013. Although the Court asked the Rajasthan government for a response, it refused to stop his sentence or grant him bail. The judges emphasized that temporary release would only be possible if there was a serious threat to his life, noting that he currently has access to medical facilities in prison. This follows a 2018 sentence of life imprisonment, which was slightly changed in May this year to remove charges of gang rape and conspiracy.

在 Asaram 的案件中，最高法院已同意審理一項針對拉賈斯坦邦（Rajasthan）高等法院裁決的挑戰。該裁決確認了他在 2013 年因性侵一名未成年人而被定罪。儘管法院要求拉賈斯坦邦政府做出回應，但拒絕中止其刑期或准予保釋。法官強調，僅在生命受到嚴重威脅的情況下才有可能獲得臨時釋放，並指出他目前在監獄中可以使用醫療設施。此前他在 2018 年被判處終身監禁，而今年 5 月該判決略有變更，刪除了關於集體強姦和共謀的指控。

Meanwhile, the Meghalaya High Court decided to keep Sonam Raghuvanshi on bail. She is the main suspect in the murder of her husband, Raja Raghuvanshi. The court based its decision on mistakes made by the police during her arrest. Specifically, the court found that the police failed to tell her why she was being arrested, which violates both the Constitution and the law. Consequently, the state's request to cancel her bail was rejected. However, the victim's family has stated that they plan to appeal this decision in the Supreme Court because they are unhappy with how the prosecution handled the case.

與此同時，梅加拉亞邦（Meghalaya）高等法院決定維持 Sonam Raghuvanshi 的保釋狀態。她是其丈夫 Raja Raghuvanshi 謀殺案的主嫌。法院做出此決定是基於警方在逮捕她時所犯的錯誤。具體而言，法院發現警方未能告知她被逮捕的原因，這違反了憲法及法律。因此，州政府取消其保釋的請求被駁回。然而，受害者家屬表示，由於不滿控方處理案件的方式，他們計劃向最高法院提出上訴。

Asaram will stay in prison while the court reviews his health and the state's response, whereas Sonam Raghuvanshi remains free on bail until a possible Supreme Court appeal.

在法院審查其健康狀況及州政府回應期間，Asaram 將繼續在獄中服刑；而 Sonam Raghuvanshi 則維持保釋，直到最高法院可能的上訴結果出爐。

The Indian judiciary has recently adjudicated on matters concerning the detention and bail eligibility of two high-profile defendants: the convicted individual Asaram and the accused Sonam Raghuvanshi.

印度司法部門最近就兩名備受關注的被告——被定罪的 Asaram 與被指控的 Sonam Raghuvanshi 的拘留與保釋資格作出裁決。

Regarding the case of Asaram, the Supreme Court has agreed to examine a challenge to a Rajasthan High Court judgment that affirmed his conviction for the 2013 sexual assault of a minor. While the Court issued a notice to the Rajasthan government for a response, it declined to suspend the sentence or grant bail. The bench, comprising Justices MM Sundresh and Sheel Nagu, stipulated that interim relief would be contingent upon the demonstration of a grave threat to the petitioner's life, noting that current medical facilities in prison shall be maintained. This legal trajectory follows a 2018 special POCSO court sentence of life imprisonment, which was partially modified by the Rajasthan High Court in May of the current year to exclude charges of gang rape and criminal conspiracy, while simultaneously acquitting co-accused individuals Sharad Chandra and Sanchita Shilpi.

關於 Asaram 的案件，最高法院已同意審理對拉賈斯坦邦高等法院判決的挑戰，該判決維持其 2013 年性侵一名未成年人的定罪。雖然法院已通知拉賈斯坦邦政府回覆，但拒絕暫緩執行刑期或准予保釋。由 MM Sundresh 與 Sheel Nagu 法官組成的法庭規定，僅在證明申請人生命受到嚴重威脅的情況下，才會考慮臨時救濟，並指出監獄內現有的醫療設施將予以維持。

Parallelly, the Meghalaya High Court upheld the bail of Sonam Raghuvanshi, the primary suspect in the homicide of her spouse, Raja Raghuvanshi. The court's determination was predicated on procedural irregularities committed by the arresting agency. Specifically, the court observed a failure to inform the accused of the grounds for arrest, which constitutes a violation of Article 22(1) of the Constitution and Section 47(1) of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS). Consequently, the state's petition for bail cancellation was dismissed. In response to this judicial outcome, the decedent's family has indicated an intention to seek a rapprochement with the Supreme Court to challenge the bail order, citing dissatisfaction with the prosecution's conduct.

與此同時，梅加拉雅邦高等法院維持了 Sonam Raghuvanshi 的保釋，她是殺害配偶 Raja Raghuvanshi 案的主嫌。法院的判定是基於逮捕機關在程序上出現錯誤。具體而言，法院發現逮捕機關未能通知被告逮捕理由，這違反了憲法第 22(1) 條以及《印度國民安全法》(BNSS) 第 47(1) 條。因此，政府申請撤銷保釋的請求被駁回。針對這一司法結果，死者家屬表示打算向最高法院申請，就保釋令提出挑戰，理由是對檢方表現不滿。

Asaram remains in custody pending a health-based review and the state's response, while Sonam Raghuvanshi remains on bail pending a potential Supreme Court appeal.

Asaram 在等待健康審查與政府回覆期間繼續被拘留，而 Sonam Raghuvanshi 則在最高法院可能接手上訴前維持保釋。