Police are looking for missing money at the Ram temple in Ayodhya. Some people took money that people gave to the temple.

警方正在阿約地亞的羅姆廟調查失蹤款項。有些人拿走了民眾捐給廟宇的錢。

The temple got a lot of money from people. But the temple did not have good rules. Workers had pockets in their clothes and the cameras did not save videos for a long time.

廟宇收到許多民眾捐款。但廟宇的制度不完善，工作人員的衣服有口袋，且攝影機的影像儲存時間不足。

A bank told the temple about problems three months ago. Some temple leaders did not listen to the bank. They kept the same workers in the counting room.

一家銀行在三個月前向廟宇反映了問題。但部分廟方領導並不理會銀行的建議，繼續讓同樣的工作人員在計數室工作。

Police arrested eight people. They found some of the missing money. Now, police are checking 400 security guards and the houses of the bad workers.

警方逮捕了八人，並找回部分失蹤款項。目前警方正在調查 400 名保全人員以及違法員工的住家。

The police are still working. They want to find all the money. One top leader left his job.

警方仍在調查中，希望能找回所有款項。一名高層領導已離職。

Authorities are currently investigating the alleged theft of public donations at the Ram temple in Ayodhya, focusing on institutional failures and the criminal responsibility of individuals.

當局目前正在調查阿約地亞（Ayodhya）羅姆廟涉嫌盜用公眾捐款的事件，重點在於機構失職與個人的刑事責任。

A Special Investigation Team (SIT) is examining the misuse of funds from a trust that received ₹82.78 crore in donations between April 2025 and February 2026. The SIT's early findings suggest a total failure of financial security measures. For example, the process of collecting and depositing cash lacked proper checks and independent verification. Furthermore, there were serious procedural errors, such as failing to require pocketless uniforms for staff and allowing a private security firm to handle searches instead of state officials. Additionally, CCTV footage was deleted every 45 days, meaning there was not enough electronic evidence to track the money.

一個特別調查小組（SIT）正在檢查一個信託基金的資金濫用情況，該基金在 2025 年 4 月至 2026 年 2 月期間收到了 8.278 億盧比的捐款。SIT 的初步發現顯示，財務安全措施完全失效。例如，收取與存放現金的程序缺乏適當的檢查與獨立驗證。此外，還存在嚴重的程序錯誤，例如未能要求員工穿著無口袋制服，並允許私營保安公司而非政府官員負責搜身。此外，CCTV 畫面每 45 天會被刪除，意味著沒有足夠的電子證據來追蹤資金。

Institutional accountability is also a major concern because the State Bank of India (SBI) reported irregularities three months before the case became public. It is claimed that some Trust officials ignored these warnings and pressured the bank to keep certain people in the counting process. Consequently, eight people have been arrested, and about ₹79.85 lakh has been recovered. The investigation has now expanded to include 400 private security guards and the personal assets of the accused, including a property bought by Luvkush Mishra for over ₹23 lakh.

機構問責也是一個主要問題，因為印度國家銀行（SBI）在案件公開前三個月就已報告異常情況。據稱部分信託官員無視這些警告，並向銀行施壓，要求保留某些人在點數過程之中。因此，已有 8 人被逮捕，並追回約 79.85 萬盧比。調查目前已擴大至 400 名私營保安人員以及被告的個人資產，包括 Luvkush Mishra 以超過 23 萬盧比購買的一處房產。

In contrast, other large temples in Uttar Pradesh, such as Kashi Vishwanath, use much stricter rules. These include having government officials present when donation boxes are opened and using constant surveillance. Meanwhile, this controversy has caused a legal conflict within the Ayodhya Bar Association. The association passed a rule refusing to represent the accused, although the Vishva Hindu Parishad argued that this move violates constitutional rights.

相比之下，北方邦其他大型廟宇（如 Kashi Vishwanath）採取了嚴格得多的規定。這些規定包括在開啟捐款箱時必須有政府官員在場，並使用持續監控。與此同時，這場爭議導致阿約地亞律師公會內部出現法律衝突。該公會通過了一項規定，拒絕代表被告，儘管世界印度教委員會（Vishva Hindu Parishad）認為此舉違反了憲法權利。

The investigation is still ongoing. Authorities are now focusing on tracing the missing money and examining the roles of former trust officials, including Champat Rai, who has resigned from his post.

調查仍在進行中。當局目前集中於追蹤失蹤資金，並檢查前信託官員的角色，包括已辭職的 Champat Rai。

Authorities are currently investigating the alleged embezzlement of public donations at the Ram temple in Ayodhya, focusing on institutional failures and individual criminal liability.

當局目前正在調查阿約地亞（Ayodhya）羅姆廟涉嫌挪用公眾捐款的事件，重點在於機構失職與個人刑事責任。

The investigation, conducted by a Special Investigation Team (SIT), centers on the misappropriation of funds from a trust that received ₹82.78 crore in donations between April 2025 and February 2026 and manages investments totaling approximately ₹2,100 crore. The SIT's preliminary findings indicate a systemic collapse of financial safeguards. Specifically, the cash-handling process—comprising collection, transportation, sorting, and deposition—lacked adequate segregation of duties and independent verification. Procedural lapses included the failure to mandate pocketless uniforms for handlers and the delegation of frisking duties to a private security firm rather than state authorities. Furthermore, electronic surveillance was deemed insufficient, as CCTV footage was automatically overwritten every 45 days, and audit trails were inadequately documented.

這次由特別調查小組（SIT）執行的調查，核心在於針對一個信託基金的資金挪用問題。該信託在 2025 年 4 月至 2026 年 2 月期間收到 82.78 億盧比捐款，並管理總額約 2,100 億盧比的投資。SIT 的初步調查結果顯示，財務保障機制出現了系統性崩潰。具體而言，現金處理流程——包括收集、運輸、分類與存放——缺乏足夠的職能分離與獨立核實。程序上的疏忽包括未能強制要求經手人穿著無口袋制服，且將搜身工作委託給私人保安公司而非政府部門。此外，電子監控被認為不足，因為 CCTV 畫面每 45 天會自動被覆蓋，且審計追蹤紀錄不足。

Institutional accountability has been further questioned following reports that the State Bank of India (SBI) flagged irregularities three months prior to the public emergence of the case. It is alleged that certain Trust officials suppressed these warnings and exerted pressure on the bank to retain specific personnel in the counting process. Consequently, eight individuals have been arrested, with approximately ₹79.85 lakh recovered. The probe has expanded to include the scrutiny of 400 private security personnel and the financial assets of the accused, including a real estate acquisition by Luvkush Mishra valued at over ₹23 lakh.

在有報導指出印度國家銀行（SBI）在案件公開前三個月就已警示違規行為後，機構問責問題進一步被質疑。據稱部分信託官員壓制了這些警告，並向銀行施壓以在點數過程中保留特定人員。因此，已有 8 人被逮捕，並追回約 79.85 萬盧比。調查範圍已擴大至審查 400 名私人保安人員以及被告的財務資產，包括 Luvkush Mishra 購買價值超過 23 萬盧比的房產。

In contrast to the Ayodhya facility, other major religious institutions in Uttar Pradesh, such as the Kashi Vishwanath, Krishna Janmabhoomi, and Banke Bihari temples, employ more rigorous protocols. These include the presence of sub-divisional magistrates during the opening of donation boxes, continuous surveillance, and the involvement of independent gazetted officers. The current controversy has also precipitated a legal conflict within the Ayodhya Bar Association, which passed a resolution prohibiting the representation of the accused, a move criticized by the Vishva Hindu Parishad as contrary to constitutional principles.

相較於阿約地亞的設施，北方邦其他主要宗教機構（如 Kashi Vishwanath、Krishna Janmabhoomi 及 Banke Bihari 廟）採用了更嚴格的協議。這些措施包括在開啟捐款箱時由分區行政長官在場、持續監控，以及由獨立的政府委任官員參與。目前的爭議也導致阿約地亞律師公會內部產生法律衝突，該公會通過了一項禁止代表被告的決議，此舉被世界印度教委員會（VHP）批評為違背憲法原則。

The investigation remains active, with authorities focusing on tracing the money trail and examining the roles of former trust officials, including Champat Rai, who has resigned from his position.

調查仍在進行中，當局重點在於追蹤資金流向，並審查前信託官員（包括已辭職的 Champat Rai）所扮演的角色。