Two men say their trials were not fair. Their lawyers want the courts to change the decisions.

兩名男子稱他們的審判不公正，律師希望法院更改判決。

In Texas, Karmelo Anthony is 19 years old. He says the judge was not fair. He says the public could not watch the trial. He also says the lawyers broke a promise about evidence.

在德州，Karmelo Anthony 今年 19 歲。他表示法官不公正，且大眾無法旁聽審判。他還表示律師違反了關於證據的承諾。

In Canada, a man was found guilty of killing Misha Pavelick in 2006. He says the judge helped the other side too much. He says the judge did not follow the rules for witnesses.

在加拿大，一名男子被裁定於 2006 年謀殺 Misha Pavelick 有罪。他表示法官過多地協助對方，且法官未遵守關於證人的規則。

Both men want new trials. They believe the judges did not follow the law.

兩名男子都要求重新審訊。他們認為法官未遵守法律。

The courts will now decide if these trials were wrong.

法院現在將決定這些審判是否錯誤。

Lawyers for two different defendants have asked the courts to cancel murder convictions, claiming that the judges acted unfairly and that legal procedures were not followed correctly.

兩名不同被告的律師已請求法院撤銷謀殺定罪，聲稱法官採取不公正行動且未正確遵守法律程序。

In Collin County, Texas, the defense for 19-year-old Karmelo Anthony has requested a new trial and asked for Judge John Roach to be removed from the case. The defense emphasizes that the right to a public trial was violated because recording devices were banned and seating for the public was limited. Furthermore, they claim that prosecutors broke an agreement regarding evidence, which forced the defendant to give up his right to testify. They also argue that Judge Roach was not impartial because of comments he made about the verdict after the trial. This case, which involves the death of Austin Metcalf, previously gained attention due to racial tensions and public protests.

在德克薩斯州的柯林郡，19 歲的 Karmelo Anthony 的辯護方已請求重新審判，並要求將法官 John Roach 從本案中除名。辯方強調，由於禁止使用錄音設備且限制公眾席位，違反了公開審判的權利。此外，他們聲稱檢察官違反了關於證據的協議，迫使被告放棄了出庭作證的權利。他們還認為 Roach 法官在審判後對裁決發表評論，顯示其並不公正。這起涉及 Austin Metcalf 死亡的案件，此前因種族緊張和公眾抗議而引起關注。

Similarly, in Regina, Saskatchewan, an appeal has been filed for a man convicted of killing Misha Pavelick in 2006. The defendant, whose name is hidden for legal reasons, argues that Justice Catherine Dawson was biased in favor of the prosecution. The defense claims that the judge handled evidence poorly and misapplied a specific legal rule regarding how witnesses are questioned. Consequently, they argue that these mistakes led to an unfair trial. Because of this, the appellant has requested that any new trial be decided by a judge instead of a jury.

同樣地，在薩斯喀徹溫省的雷吉納，一名被判定於 2006 年殺害 Misha Pavelick 的男子已提起上訴。該被告因法律原因隱匿姓名，他主張法官 Catherine Dawson 偏袒檢察方。辯方聲稱法官處理證據不當，且在質詢證人的特定法律規則上運用錯誤。因此，他們認為這些錯誤導致了不公正的審判。因此，上訴人請求任何新的審判應由法官而非陪審團決定。

Both cases are now waiting for a court decision to determine if these claims of judicial bias and procedural errors are valid.

兩起案件目前均在等待法院決定，以確定這些關於司法偏見和程序錯誤的指控是否成立。

Legal representatives for two separate defendants have filed motions seeking the reversal of murder convictions based on alleged judicial impropriety and procedural irregularities.

兩名不同被告的法律代表已提交申請，要求撤銷謀殺罪的定罪，理由是指控司法不端及程序不正常。

In the jurisdiction of Collin County, Texas, the defense for 19-year-old Karmelo Anthony has petitioned for a new trial and the recusal of Judge John Roach. The defense asserts that the Sixth Amendment right to a public trial was compromised by the prohibition of recording devices and limited gallery seating. Furthermore, the defense alleges a breach of an informal evidentiary agreement by prosecutors regarding character evidence, which purportedly coerced the defendant into waiving his right to testify. The request for recusal is predicated on the assertion that Judge Roach's post-trial comments regarding the verdict's accuracy indicate a lack of impartiality. This case, involving the fatal stabbing of Austin Metcalf, had previously attracted external scrutiny due to the racial identities of the parties and subsequent protests by third-party actors.

在德克薩斯州柯林郡的司法管轄區，19歲的Karmelo Anthony的辯護方已申請重新審訊，並要求法官John Roach迴避。辯方主張，由於禁止使用錄音設備且旁聽席位有限，導致第六修正案中公開審訊的權利受損。此外，辯方指控檢察官違反了關於人格證據的非正式證據協議，據稱強迫被告放棄了出庭作證的權利。要求迴避的依據是，Roach法官在審判後對裁決準確性的評論顯示其缺乏公正性。這起涉及致命刺殺Austin Metcalf的案件，此前因當事人的種族身份及隨後第三方發起的抗議而引起外界關注。

Parallelly, in Regina, Saskatchewan, an appeal has been lodged on behalf of a man convicted of the 2006 homicide of Misha Pavelick. The appellant, whose identity remains protected under the Youth Criminal Justice Act, contends that Justice Catherine Dawson exhibited a bias toward the Crown. The defense argues that the trial judge's communication of circumstantial evidence to the jury and the misapplication of the 'confrontation rule'—as established in Browne v. Dunn—constituted a miscarriage of justice. Specifically, the defense claims that the judicial management of witness testimony and closing arguments unduly favored the prosecution. Consequently, the appellant has requested a judge-only trial should a new proceeding be granted.

與此同時，在薩斯喀徹溫省的里賈納，一名被判定於2006年謀殺Misha Pavelick的男子已提起上訴。該上訴人的身份在《青年刑事司法法》下受到保護，他認為Catherine Dawson法官對控方持有偏見。辯方主張，審判法官向陪審團傳達情況證據的方式，以及對Browne v. Dunn案所確立的「對質原則」之誤用，構成了司法不公正。具體而言，辯方聲稱法官對證人證詞及結案陳詞的管理過分有利於控方。因此，上訴人請求若獲准重新審理，應採取僅由法官審理的模式。

Both matters currently await judicial determination regarding the validity of the claims of procedural error and judicial bias.

這兩起案件目前均在等待司法裁定，以確定程序錯誤與司法偏見之指控是否成立。