A U.S. judge wants Gautam Adani to write a legal letter. He must say if there was a secret deal to stop his court case.

一名美國法官要求 Gautam Adani 撰寫一封法律信函，說明是否透過秘密交易來終止其法庭案件。

The U.S. government had a case against Mr. Adani. They said he paid money to Indian officials to get power contracts. They also said he lied to investors. Later, the government decided to stop the case.

美國政府曾對 Adani 先生提起訴訟。他們指控他向印度官員行賄以獲取電力合約，並指控他對投資者撒謊。隨後，政府決定終止此案。

One government leader said the case was too hard to win. He said the events happened in India. He also said the new government has different goals now.

一名政府領導人表示此案太難獲勝，因為事件發生在印度。他也表示新政府現在有不同的目標。

But the judge is not sure. He thinks there might be a secret deal. He wants to know if Mr. Adani promised to spend 10 billion dollars in the U.S. to make the case go away.

但法官並不確定。他認為可能存在秘密交易，想知道 Adani 先生是否承諾在美國投資 100 億美元，以換取撤案。

Mr. Adani must send the letter by July 15. He must promise there was no secret deal.

Adani 先生必須在 7 月 15 日前寄出信函，承諾不存在秘密交易。

U.S. District Judge Nicholas Garaufis has ordered Gautam Adani to provide a sworn written statement to clarify if any secret agreements influenced the Department of Justice's decision to drop criminal charges.

美國地區法官 Nicholas Garaufis 已要求 Gautam Adani 提供一份宣誓書，以釐清是否有任何秘密協議影響了司法部撤銷刑事指控的決定。

The legal investigation began after the Department of Justice (DOJ) asked to dismiss a 2024 indictment. This case, started under the Biden administration, claimed that a bribery scheme involving about 250 million USD was used to win power contracts in India and that misleading information was given to U.S. investors. Although the Adani Group has always denied these claims, the DOJ later decided to seek a dismissal of the fraud and corruption charges.

在司法部 (DOJ) 要求撤銷 2024 年的起訴書後，法律調查隨即展開。此案始於拜登政府時期，指稱有人利用約 2.5 億美元的賄賂計劃在印度贏得電力合約，並向美國投資者提供誤導性資訊。儘管 Adani 集團一直否認這些指控，但司法部隨後決定申請撤銷詐欺與貪污指控。

R. Trent McCotter, a high-ranking official at the DOJ, emphasized that the securities case could not be defended in court. He explained that most of the events happened in India, Indian authorities found no evidence of misconduct, and investors did not lose money. Furthermore, he stated that the Trump administration had changed its priorities, focusing more on national security and international crime rather than these specific types of cases.

司法部高官 R. Trent McCotter 強調，此證券案件在法庭上無法成立。他解釋，大多數事件發生在印度，印度當局未發現違規證據，且投資者並未損失金錢。此外，他表示川普政府已改變優先順序，將重心更多放在國家安全與國際犯罪，而非這類特定案件。

Despite these reasons, Judge Garaufis noted that the DOJ's filings suggested there might be a hidden deal. Specifically, the court is checking if the charges were dropped because the Adani Group promised to invest 10 billion USD in the United States. Although McCotter denied that these investments affected the decision, the judge insisted that the court must verify the government's reasons to ensure no secret benefits were exchanged.

儘管有這些理由，Garaufis 法官指出司法部的文件暗示可能存在秘密協議。具體而言，法院正在核查撤銷指控是否因為 Adani 集團承諾在美國投資 100 億美元。雖然 McCotter 否認這些投資影響了決定，但法官堅持法院必須核實政府的理由，以確保沒有交換任何秘密利益。

Mr. Adani is expected to submit the required statement by July 15 to confirm that no illegal agreements were made.

預計 Adani 先生將在 7 月 15 日前提交所需聲明，以確認未達成任何非法協議。

U.S. District Judge Nicholas Garaufis has mandated that Gautam Adani submit a sworn affidavit to clarify if any undisclosed agreements influenced the Department of Justice's decision to drop criminal charges.

美國地區法官 Nicholas Garaufis 要求 Gautam Adani 提交一份宣誓書，以澄清是否有任何未披露的協議影響了司法部撤銷刑事指控的決定。

The current judicial scrutiny originated from a motion by the Department of Justice (DOJ) to dismiss with prejudice a 2024 indictment. This indictment, initiated under the Biden administration, alleged a bribery scheme involving approximately USD 250 million intended for Indian officials to secure power contracts, alongside the dissemination of misleading information to U.S. investors. While the Adani Group has consistently denied these allegations, the DOJ subsequently sought a dismissal of the securities fraud and Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) charges.

目前的司法審查源於司法部（DOJ）提出的一項動議，要求永久撤銷 2024 年的一份起訴書。這份起訴書是在拜登政府時期發起的，指控涉及約 2.5 億美元的賄賂計劃，旨在向印度官員行賄以獲取電力合約，並向美國投資者散布誤導性資訊。雖然 Adani 集團一貫否認這些指控，但司法部隨後尋求撤銷證券欺詐和《海外反腐敗法》（FCPA）的指控。

Principal Associate Deputy Attorney General R. Trent McCotter, identifying himself as the sole decision-maker, asserted that the securities case was legally indefensible. McCotter cited several factors for this determination: the primary occurrence of alleged conduct within Indian jurisdiction, the absence of actionable misconduct found by Indian authorities, the lack of investor losses, and the logistical challenges regarding witnesses and defendants. Furthermore, he stated that FCPA enforcement priorities had shifted under the Trump administration toward matters of national security and transnational crime.

首席助理副總檢察長 R. Trent McCotter 自稱為唯一的決策者，並聲稱證券案件在法律上無法維持。McCotter 引用了幾個決定因素：涉嫌行為主要發生在印度管轄區內、印度當局未發現可採取行動的不當行為、缺乏投資者損失，以及關於證人與被告的物流挑戰。此外，他表示在川普政府下，FCPA 的執法重點已轉向國家安全和跨國犯罪事項。

Notwithstanding these justifications, Judge Garaufis observed that McCotter's filings introduced the possibility of an undisclosed arrangement. Specifically, the court is examining whether the dismissal was contingent upon a reported commitment by the Adani Group to invest USD 10 billion in the United States. Although McCotter explicitly denied that such investments influenced the decision, the court maintains that, pursuant to Rule 48 (a), it must verify the authenticity of the government's reasoning and ensure no clandestine benefit was exchanged prior to granting the motion.

儘管有這些理由，Garaufis 法官觀察到 McCotter 提交的文件引入了存在未披露協議的可能性。具體而言，法院正在調查撤銷指控是否取決於 Adani 集團據報承諾在美國投資 100 億美元。雖然 McCotter 明確否認此類投資影響了決定，但法院堅持根據第 48 (a) 條，必須核實政府理由的真實性，並確保在批准動議前沒有交換任何秘密利益。

Mr. Adani is expected to file the required affidavit by July 15 to confirm the absence of any illicit agreements.

Adani 先生預計將在 7 月 15 日之前提交所需的宣誓書，以確認不存在任何非法協議。