A government group is looking at two news companies, ABC and SBS. They want to see if the news about Israel and Gaza is fair.

一個政府小組正在審查兩家新聞公司 ABC 和 SBS，以確認有關以色列與加薩的新聞是否公正。

Jillian Segal says the news is not fair. She says some people think the news helps only one side. She wants a new, independent group to check the news and give fines for mistakes.

Jillian Segal 表示新聞並不公正。她認為有些人覺得新聞僅偏袒其中一方。因此，她希望成立一個獨立的新小組來審查新聞，並對錯誤內容處以罰款。

ABC and SBS do not agree. ABC says people have different opinions. Some people say the news likes Palestine, and some say it likes Israel. They say their current rules are good.

ABC 和 SBS 則不同意。ABC 表示人們有不同的看法。有些人認為新聞傾向於巴勒斯坦，而有些人則認為傾向於以色列。他們表示目前的規定已經足夠。

The group also talks about the word 'antisemitism'. ABC and SBS do not use one specific definition of this word. They say they want to be free to criticize the government of Israel.

該小組還討論了「反猶太主義」一詞。ABC 和 SBS 並未使用單一的特定定義。他們表示希望保有批評以色列政府的自由。

The group is still checking the news companies. Next, they will look at universities.

該小組仍在審查這些新聞公司。接下來，他們將轉而審查大學。

The Royal Commission on Antisemitism and Social Cohesion is currently reviewing the editorial standards and complaint processes of the ABC and SBS regarding their reporting on the Israel-Gaza conflict.

反猶太主義與社會凝聚力皇家委員會目前正在審視 ABC 和 SBS 關於以色列-加薩衝突報導的編輯標準與投訴程序。

During the hearings, Jillian Segal, the Special Envoy to Combat Antisemitism, argued that current internal oversight is not enough. Ms. Segal emphasized that many in the Australian Jewish community believe public broadcasting lacks balance and gives too much attention to anti-Israel views. She described the current internal ombudsman system as a conflict of interest because the broadcasters essentially judge their own work. Consequently, she suggested creating an external regulatory body, similar to Ofcom in the UK, which could force the removal of content and issue fines.

在聽證會期間，打擊反猶太主義特使 Jillian Segal 主張，目前的內部監管並不充分。Segal 女士強調，許多澳洲猶太社區成員認為公共廣播缺乏平衡，過多關注反以色列的觀點。她將目前的內部監察員制度描述為利益衝突，因為廣播機構基本上是在審查自己的工作。因此，她建議建立一個外部監管機構，類似於英國的 Ofcom，能夠強制刪除內容並處以罰款。

However, the broadcasters disagree with these claims. The ABC presented data showing that views on bias are split, with 51% of complaints alleging a pro-Palestinian bias and 47% alleging a pro-Israel bias. This suggests that the problem is based on different community opinions rather than a failure in reporting. Furthermore, the ABC noted that no bias complaints have been upheld by its ombudsman or the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA). Meanwhile, SBS warned that changing how they are governed could threaten their editorial independence.

然而，廣播機構並不認同這些主張。ABC 提交的數據顯示，對偏見的看法存在分歧，51% 的投訴指控其親巴勒斯坦，而 47% 則指控其親以色列。這表明問題在於不同社區的意見分歧，而非報導失職。此外，ABC 指出，其內部監察員或澳洲通訊與媒體管理局 (ACMA) 均未採納任何關於偏見的投訴。同時，SBS 警告，改變治理方式可能會威脅其編輯獨立性。

There are also disagreements regarding the definition of antisemitism. Both the ABC and SBS have refused to use the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) definition because they worry it might confuse legitimate criticism of the State of Israel with antisemitism. The commission is now analyzing whether media reports increase antisemitism in Australia, while the broadcasters maintain that their journalism does not cause social division.

關於反猶太主義的定義也存在分歧。ABC 和 SBS 均拒絕使用國際猶太人大屠殺紀念聯盟 (IHRA) 的定義，因為他們擔心這可能會將對以色列國的正當批評與反猶太主義混淆。委員會目前正在分析媒體報導是否增加了澳洲的反猶太主義，而廣播機構則堅持其新聞報導不會導致社會分歧。

The Royal Commission is continuing to evaluate whether the complaint systems of public broadcasters are adequate and will soon move its focus to the university sector.

皇家委員會將繼續評估公共廣播機構的投訴系統是否充分，並將很快將焦點轉向大學部門。

The Royal Commission on Antisemitism and Social Cohesion is examining the editorial standards and complaint mechanisms of the ABC and SBS concerning their coverage of the Israel-Gaza conflict.

反猶太主義與社會凝聚力皇家委員會正就 ABC 與 SBS 關於以色列-加沙衝突報導的編輯標準及投訴機制進行審查。

The proceedings have featured testimony from the Special Envoy to Combat Antisemitism, Jillian Segal, who posited that current internal oversight mechanisms are insufficient. Ms. Segal asserted that a pervasive perception exists within the Australian Jewish community that public broadcasting lacks balance, overemphasizes the Gaza conflict relative to other global events, and provides disproportionate visibility to anti-Israel perspectives. She characterized the current internal ombudsman system as a conflict of interest, suggesting that the broadcasters effectively adjudicate their own compliance. Consequently, she advocated for the implementation of an external regulatory body, citing the UK's Ofcom as a model for a regime capable of mandating content removal and imposing financial penalties.

在聆訊中，反猶太主義特別特使 Jillian Segal 發表證詞，認為目前的內部監督機制並不充分。Segal 女士主張，澳洲猶太社區普遍認為公共廣播缺乏平衡，相較於其他全球事件，過度強調加沙衝突，並給予反以色列觀點不成比例的能見度。她將目前的內部申訴專員制度形容為利益衝突，認為廣播公司實際上是在自行判定其合規情況。因此，她主張建立一個外部監管機構，並以英國的 Ofcom 為模範，建立一個能夠強制要求刪除內容並處以罰金的體制。

Institutional responses from the broadcasters diverge from these assertions. The ABC provided data indicating that perceptions of bias are bifurcated, with 51% of complaints alleging a pro-Palestinian bias and 47% alleging a pro-Israel bias, suggesting that such perceptions are derived from divergent community viewpoints rather than systemic editorial failure. Furthermore, the ABC noted that no complaints of bias have been upheld by its ombudsman or the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA). SBS has cautioned against governance modifications that might jeopardize editorial independence or duplicate existing accountability structures.

廣播公司的機構回應則與上述主張相左。ABC 提供的數據顯示，對偏見的看法呈現兩極化，其中 51% 的投訴指稱偏向巴勒斯坦，而 47% 則指稱偏向以色列，這顯示此類看法源於社區截然不同的觀點，而非系統性的編輯失敗。此外，ABC 指出，其申訴專員或澳洲通訊與媒體管理局 (ACMA) 從未支持過任何關於偏見的投訴。

Historical and definitional tensions underpin the inquiry. A primary point of contention involves the adoption of the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) definition of antisemitism; both the ABC and SBS have declined its use, citing concerns that the definition may conflate legitimate criticism of the State of Israel with antisemitism. The commission is further analyzing the correlation between media reportage and the prevalence of antisemitism within Australia, while the broadcasters maintain that their journalism does not contribute to social division.

歷史與定義上的緊張關係是此次調查的基礎。一個主要的爭議點在於是否採納國際大屠殺記憶聯盟 (IHRA) 對反猶太主義的定義；ABC 與 SBS 均拒絕使用，理由是擔心該定義可能會將對以色列國的正當批評與反猶太主義混淆。委員會進一步分析媒體報導與澳洲反猶太主義盛行程度之間的相關性，而廣播公司則堅持其新聞報導並未導致社會分歧。

The Royal Commission continues to evaluate the adequacy of public broadcasting complaint-handling mechanisms and will soon transition its focus to the university sector.

皇家委員會將繼續評估公共廣播投訴處理機制的充分性，並將很快將焦點轉向大學部門。