Many people are using bad words against players at the World Cup. Also, some people use AI to make fake news.

許多人在世界盃中使用惡劣語言攻擊球員。此外，有些人利用 AI 製造假新聞。

More people are writing mean things online. FIFA says there are many more bad posts than in 2022. Some players and teams complained about these mean words.

越來越多人在網路上發表惡毒言論。FIFA 表示現在的負面貼文比 2022 年多出許多。部分球員與球隊對這些惡劣詞彙表示不滿。

Some people use AI to make fake videos and sounds. These fake stories make people fight. Some fake reports say some players cannot play for Germany.

有些人利用 AI 製造虛假的影片與聲音。這些假故事導致人們發生爭執。部分假報導聲稱某些球員無法代表德國出賽。

Human Rights Watch says the USA is the place for the games. They say the US government and FIFA do not stop racism. This makes people feel they can say bad things.

人權觀察指出美國是比賽舉辦地。他們表示美國政府與 FIFA 並未阻止種族歧視。這讓人們覺得可以使用惡劣語言攻擊他人。

The World Cup has two big problems. These are racism and fake digital stories.

世界盃目前面臨兩個大問題，即種族歧視與數位假故事。

The current FIFA World Cup has seen a documented increase in racial abuse toward athletes, along with a rapid spread of misinformation created by AI.

本次FIFA世界盃記錄到對運動員的種族辱罵有所增加，同時AI創造的假訊息也迅速傳播。

Data from FIFA’s social media protection service shows a significant rise in abusive content, which is thirteen times higher than in the 2022 tournament. Specifically, 11% of flagged posts contained racial abuse. This trend is supported by several incidents, such as official complaints filed by the KNVB after the Netherlands lost and a legal investigation into racist comments made by a Paraguayan senator about Kylian Mbappé. Furthermore, Professor Jacco van Sterkenburg emphasized that the use of biased language by commentators creates an environment where explicit discrimination becomes more acceptable.

FIFA社交媒體保護服務的數據顯示，辱罵內容大幅增加，比2022年的賽事高出13倍。具體而言，11%被標記的貼文含有種族辱罵。這一趨勢可由數起事件證實，例如荷蘭隊失利後KNVB提出的正式投訴，以及針對一名巴拉圭參議員就基利安·姆巴佩發表種族主義言論的法律調查。此外，Jacco van Sterkenburg教授強調，評論員使用帶有偏見的語言，會營造出一種令顯性歧視變得更容易被接受的環境。

At the same time, the use of AI-generated content and coordinated disinformation has increased. For example, fake recordings of manager Ronald Koeman and manipulated audio attributed to Algerian fans have been used to simulate racial conflict. Additionally, false reports about petitions to remove certain players from the German national team spread across social media, even though Deutsche Welle denied these claims.

與此同時，使用AI生成內容與協調性假訊息的情況有所增加。例如，有人使用經篡改的音訊假冒總教練Ronald Koeman，或偽造成阿爾及利亞球迷，以模擬種族衝突。此外，社交媒體上傳播關於要求將特定球員剔除出德國國家隊的請願假消息，儘管德國之聲（Deutsche Welle）已否認這些指控。

Experts believe these problems are linked to the current global political climate. Human Rights Watch suggested that because the tournament is in the United States, the administration's strict immigration policies and xenophobic language have made the situation worse. The organization further asserted that FIFA has failed to enforce anti-discrimination rules, partly because of its close relationship with the U.S. administration, which has encouraged people to use hate speech.

專家認為這些問題與目前的全球政治氣候有關。人權觀察（Human Rights Watch）指出，由於賽事在美國舉行，美國政府嚴格的移民政策與排外言論使情況惡化。該組織進一步聲稱，FIFA未能有效執行反歧視規則，部分原因是其與美國政府關係密切，而後者鼓勵人們使用仇恨言論。

The tournament continues to struggle with two major problems: systemic racial hostility and the use of advanced digital falsehoods.

賽事仍持續面臨兩個主要問題：系統性的種族敵對，以及進階數位假訊息的運用。

The current FIFA World Cup has been characterized by a documented increase in racial abuse toward athletes and the simultaneous proliferation of AI-generated misinformation.

本次FIFA世界盃的特徵在於，針對運動員的種族辱罵記錄顯著增加，同時AI生成的假訊息大量氾濫。

The prevalence of discriminatory behavior is evidenced by quantitative data from FIFA’s social media protection service, which recorded a thirteen-fold increase in abusive content compared to the 2022 tournament. Racially motivated abuse constituted 11% of flagged posts. This trend is corroborated by specific incidents, including the filing of official complaints by the KNVB following the Netherlands' defeat and a judicial investigation by Paris prosecutors into racist remarks directed at Kylian Mbappé by a Paraguayan senator. Furthermore, institutionalized bias is noted in the use of racially coded language by commentators, which Professor Jacco van Sterkenburg posits creates a permissive environment for explicit discrimination.

歧視行為的普遍程度可由FIFA社交媒體保護服務的定量數據證明，記錄顯示辱罵內容比2022年賽事增加了13倍。種族動機的辱罵佔了被標記貼文的11%。這一趨勢由具體事件佐證，包括KNVB在荷蘭隊落敗後提交的正式申訴，以及巴黎檢察官針對一名巴拉圭參議員對基利安·姆巴佩（Kylian Mbappé）發表種族主義言論的司法調查。此外，評論員使用具有種族暗示的語言顯示出制度化偏見，Jacco van Sterkenburg 教授認為這為顯而易見的歧視創造了寬容環境。

Concurrent with these verified incidents is the emergence of synthetic media and coordinated disinformation. AI-generated content, such as a fabricated recording of manager Ronald Koeman and repurposed audio falsely attributed to Algerian supporters, has been utilized to simulate racial conflict. Additionally, fraudulent reports regarding petitions to exclude specific demographics from the German national team were disseminated via social media, despite denials from Deutsche Welle.

與這些經過證實的事件同時出現的是合成媒體與協調式假訊息。AI生成的內容，例如偽造的總教練Ronald Koeman錄音，以及被錯誤歸因於阿爾及利亞支持者的重複利用音頻，已被用於模擬種族衝突。此外，儘管德國之聲（Deutsche Welle）已否認，但社交媒體上仍散布關於要求將特定族群排除在德國國家隊之外的欺詐性請願報告。

Stakeholders have identified a correlation between this volatility and the broader geopolitical climate. Human Rights Watch suggests that the tournament's location in the United States, coupled with the administration's xenophobic rhetoric and immigration policies, has exacerbated the situation. The organization further contends that FIFA's perceived alignment with the U.S. administration—exemplified by the awarding of a peace prize to Donald Trump and the reduction of anti-racism initiatives—signals a systemic failure to enforce non-discrimination statutes, thereby emboldening perpetrators of hate speech.

利害關係人發現這種不穩定性與更廣泛的地緣政治氣候相關。人權觀察（Human Rights Watch）指出，賽事在美國舉行，加上美國政府的排外言論與移民政策，加劇了此情況。該組織進一步主張，FIFA被認為與美國政府結盟——例如將和平獎頒給川普（Donald Trump）以及削減反種族主義計畫——顯示出在執行非歧視法規方面存在系統性失效，從而助長了仇恨言論的傳播者。

The tournament continues to face a dual challenge of systemic racial hostility and the sophisticated deployment of digital falsehoods.

賽事將持續面對系統性種族敵視與精密部署的數位假訊息這雙重挑戰。